![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't need a taildragger to operate off grass - Especially 5000 feet! You
need a Bonanza. Great on on grass, great on short fields (not that yours will be short), and fast. You have pretty much described the mission profile for an older Bone. But tri-gear Cessnas are fine on grass. As are Piper Tri-Pacers. Best regards, Steve Robertson N4732J 1967 Beechcraft Muskeer Jim wrote: Why a tail dragger? There is no good reason other than 'something to do' in this pilot's opinion. Exactly my idea. Just something to have fun in but still use to haul the wife and kids around when needed. I have the opportunity to put a 1/2 mile grass strip right infront of my house and am currently getting a good tailwheel checkout. I'm torn between two goals. I can either pursue a partnership in a faster complex plane for some serious cross country flying (which I do enough of to justify it), or I could go it on my own and pick up a fairly nice Cessna 170 and eventually build a hanger and a strip at my house. I'd still be able to rent a faster larger plane for the longer cross country trips. -- Jim Burns III Remove "nospam" to reply |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Steve Robertson wrote: You don't need a taildragger to operate off grass - Especially 5000 feet! Since when is a half mile 5,000'? George Patterson A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something that can be learned no other way. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Whoops! Well, it never was. Fortunately, 2600 feet plus or minus is still plenty
enough for all of the aircraft mentioned so far in this thread. Best, Steve Robertson N4732J 1967 Beechcraft Musketeer "G.R. Patterson III" wrote: Steve Robertson wrote: You don't need a taildragger to operate off grass - Especially 5000 feet! Since when is a half mile 5,000'? George Patterson A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something that can be learned no other way. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maule is good!
Dashi "Steve Robertson" wrote in message ... You don't need a taildragger to operate off grass - Especially 5000 feet! You need a Bonanza. Great on on grass, great on short fields (not that yours will be short), and fast. You have pretty much described the mission profile for an older Bone. But tri-gear Cessnas are fine on grass. As are Piper Tri-Pacers. Best regards, Steve Robertson N4732J 1967 Beechcraft Muskeer |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dashi wrote: Maule is good! Not necessarily. You'd better be good friends with the person in the other seat in your row, 'cause there ain't much room. If you bought the 160hp model, the useful load with full fuel is going to be around 550 lbs. If you bought the 235, it may be less than that (of course, full fuel is more gallons on that model). And you won't get anyone into the plane unless they're in real good shape and pretty flexible (or you have a *big* shoehorn). That big fin makes it a real bear to handle in any crosswind over about 12 knots (want an audience for your landing, just announce you're coming in in a Maule when the wind is over 15 and gusting). As I said in an earlier post, a 180hp Maule is something to consider, but the Cessna 180 is a better plane (if you can afford one). BTW, I own a Maule MX-7-160. George Patterson A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something that can be learned no other way. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Steve Robertson wrote:
You don't need a taildragger to operate off grass - Especially 5000 feet! You need a Bonanza. Great on on grass, great on short fields (not that yours I second that - good strong gear, lots of power, effective flaps. A Bonanza can be landed shorter and taken off shorter than a C172, and copes with rough fields well (tough gear, plenty of prop clearance). But a Bonanza is a lot more expensive to run than a C170 or Stinson 108! -- Dylan Smith, Castletown, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net "Maintain thine airspeed, lest the ground come up and smite thee" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim wrote: What's your opinion about the best taildragger that has room for at least 2 adults plus kids? Reasons and experiences please. I'd say a Cessna 180. Kids don't stay kids for long, and the 180 will carry four adults. All metal, so it doesn't have to be hangared. Any A&P knows how to work on one. They *are* getting old, though, and good ones don't come cheap. The Maule MX-7-180B would be cheaper. They will also carry four, but they're a bit more cramped inside. Fuselage is fabric, which may give periodic trouble if kept outside. They're newer planes and parts are very easy to find. The 180B has a 180hp Lycoming with a CS prop. Avoid the 160 and 235hp models. They won't carry the load that the 180 carries. Check http://www.mauleairinc.com for performance specs. Stinsons are probably the best bang for the buck, but they're old and the Franklin engines aren't made anymore. Parts are still available, since the plant in Poland still has some engines they're parting out, but there could be some real trouble ahead there. AOPA Pilot had a good article on them a few months ago; should be on their web site somewhere. George Patterson A man who carries a cat by the tail learns something that can be learned no other way. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim wrote:
What's your opinion about the best taildragger that has room for at least 2 adults plus kids? Reasons and experiences please. My wife and I own a 150hp Piper Pacer we bought to get tailwheel experience. Its a fun little airplane. We have gone airplane camping in the Ut/Id/Mt mountains. I recommend the Pacer highly as a two-place plus some gear airplane, but wouldn't put my kids (and gear) in the back, at least not to the places we go... For serious backcountry hauling, I use my stol-equipped Skylane. I have recently been thinking about a 180/185, but cant justify spending double what the 182 is worth to buy a 180/185 project which is going to take a year or more to get it up to the same standards that my 182 is already at... I'm looking for a large nosefork for the 182, and plan to put a 6.00 nose wheel and 8.00 mains on it, and call it good... I can already operate out of 97% of the places where 185s go... MikeM Skylane '1MM see: http://home.utah.edu/~mgm17160/TwoMM.JPG Pacer '00Z see: http://home.utah.edu/~mgm17160/miken007.jpg |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim" wrote in message ... What's your opinion about the best taildragger that has room for at least 2 adults plus kids? Reasons and experiences please. -- How MANY kids? How about a Beech B-18? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
American nazi pond scum, version two | bushite kills bushite | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 21st 04 10:46 PM |
Hey! What fun!! Let's let them kill ourselves!!! | [email protected] | Naval Aviation | 2 | December 17th 04 09:45 PM |
Group Poll: Best 2+kids or 4 place taildragger? | Jim | Owning | 28 | December 2nd 03 01:57 AM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |