CHARTER: rec.aviation.piloting

Jim Weir wrote:

That's true for us damyankees.

Jim, you don't qualify. You're out west. Damyankees are people from up north who
come south and *stay*.

George Patterson
Great discoveries are not announced with "Eureka!". What's usually said is
"Hummmmm... That's interesting...."

In article , Jim Weir
wrote:

That's true for us damyankees. If you are from Dixie, the hangar flying
starts of with "Now this ain't no ****...".

The way I heard it, it went...
"All y'all listen up! Now this ain't no ****..."

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 03:23:04 GMT, john smith
wrote in Message-Id: :

If members of the readership of rec.aviation.piloting feel that the
constraints of this duly enacted charter prevent them from posting
articles that might be classified as 'hangar flying' topics (as
opposed to 'piloting' topics) just say the word, and we can start the
process to have rec.aviation.hangar-flying chartered, or they can post
articles on those topics to rec.aviation.misc.

I'm a native English speaker, and I still can't figure out what the
difference between piloting topics and hangar flying is.

You will note that the rec.aviation.piloting charter demands that
articles contain INFORMATION relating to specific piloting subjects.
Articles that fail to meet that demand would be candidates for
rec.aviation.hangar-flying IMO.

"Larry Dighera" wrote:
I'm a native English speaker, and I still can't figure out what the
difference between piloting topics and hangar flying is.

You will note that the rec.aviation.piloting charter demands that
articles contain INFORMATION relating to specific piloting subjects.
Articles that fail to meet that demand would be candidates for
rec.aviation.hangar-flying IMO.

Horse hockey.

"Larry Dighera" wrote in message
...

snip
You will note that the rec.aviation.piloting charter demands that
articles contain INFORMATION relating to specific piloting subjects.
Articles that fail to meet that demand would be candidates for
rec.aviation.hangar-flying IMO.
snip

IMO = in my opinion

Opinions are like assholes. Everyone has one and they all stink.

Maybe others don't have the same opinions as you...

Larry Dighera is one of the most frequent off-topic posters on this news
group. This post is a thinly disguised attempt to suppress political
opinions other than his own.

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...
Larry Dighera is one of the most frequent off-topic posters on this news
group. This post is a thinly disguised attempt to suppress political
opinions other than his own.


I have to agree that the two things that should be avoided are discussions
of religion and politics. They hold very strong views and emotions, and are
not likely to be changed by anyone's persuasions. All that happens is name
calling.
--
Jim in NC

On Wed, 31 Dec 2003 01:12:05 -0800, Morgans wrote:

I have to agree that the two things that should be avoided are discussions
of religion and politics. They hold very strong views and emotions, and are
not likely to be changed by anyone's persuasions. All that happens is name
calling.

very true.
and I have to blame myself for also going OT sometimes.

#m
--
harsh regulations in North Korea (read below link after reading the story):
http://www.laweekly.com/ink/04/04/open-mikulan.php
oooops ... sorry ... it happened in the USA, ya know: the land of the free.

In article , Morgans
wrote:

I have to agree that the two things that should be avoided are discussions
of religion and politics. They hold very strong views and emotions, and are
not likely to be changed by anyone's persuasions. All that happens is name
calling.

Well, that pretty much sums up discussions about the current Bush
administration, doesn't it? Two subjects in the same thread. Oh wait,
that's why it's called the religious right! (now there's an oximoron)
;-)

"Morgans" wrote in message
...
I have to agree that the two things that should be avoided are discussions
of religion and politics. They hold very strong views and emotions, and
are
not likely to be changed by anyone's persuasions. All that happens is
name
calling.

I would agree with the first statement above except that our flying
situations do involve politics. Meigs Field is one example. TFRs are
another example. I could go on and on.

Simon