![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Duniho wrote: You do understand that he's talking about a turbocharged engine, right? Generally speaking, full rich is the correct mixture setting for a turbocharged piston engine, for full-power takeoffs regardless of altitude. 'Generally speaking', but not necessarily. Full-rich is the correct takeoff setting for a FUEL-INJECTED engine regardless of altitude, but *not* for a CARBURETED engine. Most turbocharged engines are injected, but not all. In fact, the Turbo 182 has one that isn't: a (carbureted) Lyc 0-540. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Really - my carbureted 182 calls for full rich on takeoff
"Mark Mallory" wrote in message ... 'Generally speaking', but not necessarily. Full-rich is the correct takeoff setting for a FUEL-INJECTED engine regardless of altitude, but *not* for a CARBURETED engine. Most turbocharged engines are injected, but not all. In fact, the Turbo 182 has one that isn't: a (carbureted) Lyc 0-540. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Michael 182 wrote: Really - my carbureted 182 calls for full rich on takeoff So does mine - at SL on a standard day. But not on a hot 95 degF afternoon at 5000 MSL. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Duniho wrote:
"john smith" wrote in message ... [...] Had you need to do a go around, the cruise mixture would have been sufficient for a full power go-around. You do understand that he's talking about a turbocharged engine, right? Generally speaking, full rich is the correct mixture setting for a turbocharged piston engine, for full-power takeoffs regardless of altitude. Yes, I remembered the turbo part this afternoon. For descent there is no reason to change the mixture unless you are going to push the throttle back in beyond the cruise power setting. For takeoff, the turbo should maintain sealevel power up to 12,000 feet MSL, so full rich or slightly leaned mixture would be used on takeoff. I think I would still lean for best power prior to releasing brakes for takeoff. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Michael,
What do you experience that causes you to have to enrichen your mixture as you descend on your airplane? Are you descending while carrying a very high power setting? I'm asking because I've flown T182s and TR182s and have never run into a situation that required enrichening the mixture during descent unless I leveled off at some intermediate altitude and went to a relatively high power setting. Otherwise, the only reason to enrichen the mixture during descent is if the engine actually begins to run roughly. (See the POH which only recommends enrichening if you experience engine roughness.) Most people descend at 65% power or less, which means that it is impossible to detonate the engine due to lack of heat and pressure, so it's impossible to run it too lean (it will simply start to run rough and then quit if you get it too lean, you won't hurt anything). Keeping it leaned during descent helps avoid overcooling (if you believe in shock cooling), helps keep the plugs from fouling and doesn't waste fuel. In general, once you lean the engine for cruise on a T182 you needn't touch the mixture control until you pull it to idle cutoff after landing, or to go to full rich on a go around. All the best, Rick "Michael 182" wrote in message news:KXjMb.26563$5V2.40699@attbi_s53... Are you sure about this? I always have to enrichen the mixture as I decrease altitude. Michael "john smith" wrote in message ... Barry Klein wrote: How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? Did you enrichen the mixture between cruise and landing? There should have been no reason to. As you reduce altitude and MP, the mixture will enrichen with decrease in altitude. Had you need to do a go around, the cruise mixture would have been sufficient for a full power go-around. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Rick Durden wrote:
Otherwise, the only reason to enrichen the mixture during descent is if the engine actually begins to run roughly. (See the POH which only recommends enrichening if you experience engine roughness.) Most people descend at 65% power or less, which means that it is impossible to detonate the engine due to lack of heat and pressure, so it's impossible to run it too lean (it will simply start to run rough and then quit if you get it too lean, you won't hurt anything). Keeping it leaned during descent helps avoid overcooling (if you believe in shock cooling), helps keep the plugs from fouling and doesn't waste fuel. In general, once you lean the engine for cruise on a T182 you needn't touch the mixture control until you pull it to idle cutoff after landing, or to go to full rich on a go around. All the best, Rick The POH for my TB-21 (turbocharged Trinidad) with a Lycoming TIO-540 calls for putting the mixture full rich prior to landing. Is that different from what most people do with this engine? -- David Rind |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'll check my POH - I tend to enrichen somewhat by the fuel flow on the
Shadin - maybe this is a bad habit. I'm sure I'm not over 65% on the descent. Michael "Rick Durden" wrote in message m... Michael, What do you experience that causes you to have to enrichen your mixture as you descend on your airplane? Are you descending while carrying a very high power setting? I'm asking because I've flown T182s and TR182s and have never run into a situation that required enrichening the mixture during descent unless I leveled off at some intermediate altitude and went to a relatively high power setting. Otherwise, the only reason to enrichen the mixture during descent is if the engine actually begins to run roughly. (See the POH which only recommends enrichening if you experience engine roughness.) |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes. The mixture was too rich.
This is a common problem with big-bore engines when operated above 3000 MSL. What we teach at Colorado Pilots Association is to set the mixture to 15 GPH as you enter the pattern at (near) cruise power. That way the engine continues to run on the ground. :-) Of course, if you do a balked landing, you MUST push the mixture full in after you increase the power for the go around. Barry Klein wrote: We took a newer 182 turbo to a 7000' elevation airport yesterday and the engine quit at the end of the landing roll. I'm sure the mixture was way too rich. It restarted without incident, glad we were on the ground! We had the mixture set about 100 deg rich of peak TIT for cruise at 9500. How should we have found the correct mixture setting for power-off final approach, when the turbo is basically adding no boost and we are at high density altitude? This is not addressed in the POH. It does say full rich on takoff regardless of airport elevation. Later that day, when taxiing for takoff, we set 1200 rpm and leaned for peak rpm, mixture knob was out 1.5-2 inches to achieve this. When we returned home to 800' elevation, we checked the idle speed at full rich, it was about 500 rpm, is this too low? Thanks, Barry Best regards, Jer/ "Flight instruction and mountain flying are my vocation!" Eberhard -- Jer/ (Slash) Eberhard, Mountain Flying Aviation, LTD, Ft Collins, CO CELL 970 231-6325 EMAIL jer'at'frii.com WEB http://www.frii.net/~jer C-206 N9513G, CFII Airplane&Glider, FAA-DEN Aviation Safety Counselor CAP-CO Mission&Aircraft CheckPilot, BM218 HAM N0FZD, 197 Young Eagles! |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Rind" wrote in message
... The POH for my TB-21 (turbocharged Trinidad) with a Lycoming TIO-540 calls for putting the mixture full rich prior to landing. Is that different from what most people do with this engine? What actual model engine does the TB-21 have? Just knowing that it's a TIO-540 doesn't give us enough information to compare with our own engines. The engine in my plane, a TIO-540-AA1AD, cannot stay running at full rich at idle at high density altitudes, as I mentioned in another post. I put the mixture to full rich before landing only when landing below 3000' or so (and then only so that I am more prepared for a go-around...operationally, I wind up leaning again after leaving the runway so that the plugs don't foul). Pete |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mark Mallory" wrote in message
... Michael 182 wrote: Really - my carbureted 182 calls for full rich on takeoff So does mine - at SL on a standard day. But not on a hot 95 degF afternoon at 5000 MSL. What's the critical altitude of the turbocharged engine in your airplane? Is it above or below the density altitude for that 95 F at 5000'? As long as you are taking off at full power, I see no reason why you would not use full rich mixture. Conversely, if even with the turbocharger, you cannot make full power, I can believe one would need to lean. I don't see why the difference should be between fuel-injected versus carbureted. The metering is basically the same for both; only the method of delivery is different. Pete |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GPS approach question | Matt Whiting | Instrument Flight Rules | 30 | August 29th 08 03:54 AM |
VOR/DME Approach Question | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 47 | August 29th 04 05:03 AM |
Canadian holding procedures | Derrick Early | Instrument Flight Rules | 24 | July 22nd 04 04:03 PM |
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools | RT | Military Aviation | 104 | September 25th 03 03:17 PM |
IR checkride story! | Guy Elden Jr. | Instrument Flight Rules | 16 | August 1st 03 09:03 PM |