A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

A GA pilot in the White House



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 28th 04, 06:49 PM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
| In a previous article, "Roger Long"
om said:
| Would they let him fly or would the TFR's keep him grounded?
|
| Who would bust him if he violated his own TFR?
|
| More importantly, what would they call the flight? "Civil One"?

It might not be technically proper, but they probably would call it "Air
Force One" out of habit.

That points up the reason the Secret Service would not let him fly. Besides
being an unnecessary risk, the call sign "Air Force One" was adopted after a
near miss involving the Presidential airplane. Before that they used
ordinary call signs. The idea behind "Air Force One" was to encourage
controllers to be more careful. Putting a President up in an civil general
aviation aircraft would expose him to all kinds of dangers the Secret
Service would find unacceptable. The airplane would be more vulnerable to
ground fire, it is more susceptible to mid-air collisions, low level
maneuvering would be regarded as dangerous, etc. Imagine trying to cram the
Secret Service detail, "the football," and everything else that goes with
President aboard a typical GA plane. It is tough enough if the President
just wants to go fishing for an afternoon.

The President's political opponents would "Tilt," too. "How can he risk the
fate of the free world so irresponsibly?"

No, once you become President, you can forget about doing a lot of things
that most people take for granted. You are almost as much a prisoner as the
Emperor of China was in the Forbidden City.


  #2  
Old January 28th 04, 10:50 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


It might not be technically proper, but they probably would call it "Air
Force One" out of habit.


White House One has a nice ring to it.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #3  
Old January 28th 04, 10:52 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Imagine trying to cram the
Secret Service detail, "the football," and everything else that goes with
President aboard a typical GA plane.


How did they manage when Bush flew out to Lincoln? There was no Secret
Service detail in the S-3B.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #4  
Old January 29th 04, 01:22 AM
Morgans
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Cub Driver" wrote in message
...

Imagine trying to cram the
Secret Service detail, "the football," and everything else that goes with
President aboard a typical GA plane.


How did they manage when Bush flew out to Lincoln? There was no Secret
Service detail in the S-3B.

all the best -- Dan Ford


I recall there was one in the plane and a few more in the other plane in the
flight of two.
--
Jim in NC


  #5  
Old January 29th 04, 02:06 PM
Dennis O'Connor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Probably, but it does raise the question why the CIC requires a civilian
security detail when totally sorrounded by several thousand of his military
who have taken an oath to protect and serve, and to die following orders if
necessary - including those authorized to arm and launch tactical nukes - A
civilian is likely to be more loyal that that?
denny

"Morgans" wrote in I recall there was one in
the plane and a few more in the other plane in the
flight of two.



  #6  
Old January 28th 04, 10:54 PM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


No, once you become President, you can forget about doing a lot of things
that most people take for granted.


Ford went skiing at Vail. Arguably that's more dangerous than flying.
I've met three paraplegics in my life, and two of them were injured at
Aspen, one on Ajax and the other in a swimming pool.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #7  
Old January 30th 04, 12:21 AM
Mike O'Malley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"C J Campbell" wrote in message
...

"Paul Tomblin" wrote in message
...
| In a previous article, "Roger Long"
om said:
| Would they let him fly or would the TFR's keep him grounded?
|
| Who would bust him if he violated his own TFR?
|
| More importantly, what would they call the flight? "Civil One"?

It might not be technically proper, but they probably would call it "Air
Force One" out of habit.


C'mon CJ, I would expect a world famous flight instructor like yourself would
know this one, as I'm pretty sure it's in the AIM.

AF- "Air Force One"
USMC (from the White House Lawn)- "Marine One"
Navy "Navy One"
Army (has this one ever been used?)- "Army One"
and
Civil- "Executive One" (has a sitting president EVER flown in a civilian
aircraft since this nomeclature has been used?)


  #8  
Old January 30th 04, 02:42 AM
Paul Tomblin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In a previous article, "Mike O'Malley" said:
Civil- "Executive One" (has a sitting president EVER flown in a civilian
aircraft since this nomeclature has been used?)


I remember Nixon going on a commercial flight once. The Secret Service
had kittens.


--
Paul Tomblin http://xcski.com/blogs/pt/
I think it's a beautiful day to go to the zoo and feed the ducks.
To the lions.
-- Brian Kantor
  #9  
Old January 30th 04, 10:48 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


The Queen flew BA a year or two ago.

I believe she took over the first class cabin. The paying passengers
had to board and be seated (and presumably the ramp taken away) before
she boarded the aircraft.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email:

see the Warbird's Forum at
www.warbirdforum.com
and the Piper Cub Forum at www.pipercubforum.com
  #10  
Old January 28th 04, 07:06 PM
Orval Fairbairn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
(Paul Tomblin) wrote:

In a previous article, "Roger Long"
om said:
Would they let him fly or would the TFR's keep him grounded?


Who would bust him if he violated his own TFR?

More importantly, what would they call the flight? "Civil One"?



"Executive One."
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
Looking for Cessna Caravan pilots [email protected] Owning 9 April 1st 04 02:54 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Piloting 25 September 11th 03 01:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.