Another ID change for Smoketown? (37PA, Q08, S37)

"G. Burkhart" wrote in message
news:fdCpc.56114$536.9689876@attbi_s03...

I remember reading online about airport identifiers a while back.
Now, if only I can find it again...


http://www.faa.gov/atpubs/LID/LIDHME.htm

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote:

"Jeff Saylor" wrote in message
...

Here's another interesting case, Drummond (Montana) Airport lost
its three letter identifier, DRU (or KDRU) recently. It is now M26.
It will be interesting to see where KDRU pops up next, I don't
know of many cases where an airport lost its 3 letter id.


Three-letter identifiers are assigned to navaids; to airports with a manned
air traffic control facility or navigational aid within airport boundary; to
airports that receive scheduled route air carrier or military airlift service,
and to airports designated by the U.S. Customs Service as Airports of Entry.



I believe airports with weather reporting capability also qualify; many airports
that do not meet the qualifications above received all letters after their new
ASOS/AWOS was comissioned. On a related note, a bunch of VORs that had the same
3 letter ID as airports that they were near had their IDs changed a number of
years ago. For example the Williamsport (Pa) VOR had its ID changed from IPT
to FQM. I've wondered if the letters FQM stand for anything but as far as I can
tell it's just a random identifier. The VOR is a distance away from IPT (KIPT)
the airport, and sits atop a mountain ridge. Apparently some pilots flew to the
mountain instead of the airport.

On the other hand MHT VOR is 4.8 miles away from KMHT (Manchester NH) airport
and they share the same identifier.

This appears to violate 7350.7N 1-2-5
1-2-5 Duplication
a. At the same location, the same identifier may be assigned to one
navigational aid (which must be located within the airport boundary), to the
airport, to a manned air traffic control facility, and to an aviation weather
station on the airport. With certain restrictions, variations of the airport
identifier may be assigned also to landing systems.


DRU VOR is close by, but it's not within the airport boundary, so DRU should never have been the identifier for Drummond Airport. Apparently
somebody finally caught the error.

7350.7N 1-2-4 doesn't make it clear that this is ground for changing the
identifier that has been assigned, although it is probably safe to assume that
if the VOR could no longer share its ID with the airport than this airport was
less important.

1-2-4 Permanence.
Established three-letter identifiers are considered permanent and will not be
changed without strong and documented justification, primarily concerning air
safety. Other than three-letter identifiers may be changed when the status of a
landing facility changes, e.g. private-use to public-use, etc.

"G. Burkhart" wrote in message
news:fdCpc.56114$536.9689876@attbi_s03...

I may be wrong, but don't most 3-letter identifiers offer weather
reporting
of some type? There are probably exceptions, but if the identifier
contains
numbers, they don't offer weather reporting. I have seen identifiers
change

My home base of KWAY has no weather reporting and not even a published
instrument approach (though an approach is in the design process finally).


--------------------
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com

"Jeff Saylor" wrote in message
...

That's usually true. An exception is G. O. Carlson-Chester County
Airport,
Pennsylvania. It's had weather reporting for a while now and I've heard
of no
plans to change its identifer from 40N.

The primary motivating factor to change to a 3-letter identifier is when an
airport has a localizer or ILS approach. The FAA has decided they want the
navaid ID to match the airport ID, i.e. in Pennsylvania 2G3 was changed to
KVVS because the localizer is IVVS and the NDB/FAF is VV.

--------------------
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

Three-letter identifiers are assigned to navaids; to airports with a
manned
air traffic control facility or navigational aid within airport boundary;
to
airports that receive scheduled route air carrier or military airlift
service, and to airports designated by the U.S. Customs Service as
Airports
of Entry.

KWAY meets none of these requirements. As far as I know it never met the
requirements although I cannot say that with certainty.

Why does it have a 3-letter identifier?


--------------------
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com

"Jeff Saylor" wrote in message
...

I believe airports with weather reporting capability also qualify;
many airports that do not meet the qualifications above received
all letters after their new ASOS/AWOS was comissioned.


Yes, I meant to include that. I didn't copy far enough.



On a related note, a bunch of VORs that had the same 3 letter
ID as airports that they were near had their IDs changed a
number of years ago. For example the Williamsport (Pa) VOR
had its ID changed from IPT to FQM. I've wondered if the
letters FQM stand for anything but as far as I can tell it's just a
random identifier. The VOR is a distance away from IPT (KIPT)
the airport, and sits atop a mountain ridge. Apparently some
pilots flew to the mountain instead of the airport.

On the other hand MHT VOR is 4.8 miles away from KMHT
(Manchester NH) airport and they share the same identifier.

This appears to violate 7350.7N 1-2-5
1-2-5 Duplication
a. At the same location, the same identifier may be assigned to
one navigational aid (which must be located within the airport
boundary), to the airport, to a manned air traffic control facility,
and to an aviation weather station on the airport. With certain
restrictions, variations of the airport identifier may be assigned
also to landing systems.


The location identifier criteria obviously changed over time. About twenty
years ago navaids that shared their identifiers with airports but weren't
located on the field began having their identifiers changed. But not all of
them were changed, those that were fairly close were left alone. The cutoff
seemed to be about five miles.



7350.7N 1-2-4 doesn't make it clear that this is ground for
changing the identifier that has been assigned, although it is probably
safe to assume that if the VOR could no longer share its ID with the
airport than this airport was less important.

1-2-4 Permanence.
Established three-letter identifiers are considered permanent and will
not be changed without strong and documented justification, primarily
concerning air safety. Other than three-letter identifiers may be
changed when the status of a landing facility changes, e.g. private-use
to public-use, etc.


FAAO 7350.7 doesn't say anything about what conditions constitute grounds
for changing a 3-letter identifier, but quite a few have changed over the
years nonetheless. DRU is different than any other I've seen change. All
the rest were VORs, which qualify for 3-letter identifiers on their own,
they were just changed to some other 3-letter identifier because they shared
the identifier with an airport some distance away, an airport which also
qualified for a 3-letter identifier on it's own.

But Drummond Airport doesn't qualify for a 3-letter identifier on it's own,
it's not even close. It's just a single short turf strip, 2400 feet, with
no services or lighting. One wonders why it ever had a 3-letter identifier.
One wonders so much that one is compelled to dig out some old publications
that explain it.

Drummond Airport is a former CAA Intermediate Field, it was Site 44B on the
Seattle-Helena airway, part of Green 2. In 1945 the runway was 3600 feet
long, it had runway and obstruction lights, a rotating beacon with course
lights, and an Airway Communication Station (FSS). There was a rotating
airway beacon with course lights, Site 44A on the airway, about three miles
northwest of the field, Drummond Radio Range was about a mile and a half
northeast of the field. The range identifier was DR.

By 1947 an Airport Approach Zone had been added.

By 1954 Drummond VOR/DME was in operation, located immediately south of the
radio range. The range and VOR shared the identifier DRU. Victor 2 had
been established coincident with Green 2. The runway had been reduced to
2600 feet.

By 1962 Green 2 had been disestablished. The radio range was still there
but the identifier had been changed to DU. The VOR, instead of showing DME,
now shows NSME-Non Standard Measuring Equipment. I haven't a clue what that
was.

By 1967 the radio range was gone, the airway beacon was gone, the FSS was
gone, and the VOR had no measuring equipment at all.

In 1972 the airport beacon and course lights were still in operation, as was
the field lighting.

By 1987 the course lights and field lighting were gone, but the airport
beacon was still in operation. The runway was down to it's present 2400
feet.

By 2001 the airport beacon was gone.

The chart segment available on AeroPlanner.com still shows the airport
identifier to be DRU, so the change was very recent.

"Richard Kaplan" wrote in message
s.com...

KWAY meets none of these requirements. As far as I know it
never met the requirements although I cannot say that with certainty.

Why does it have a 3-letter identifier?


We discussed that one some time ago. I can find no reason for that airport
to ever have a 3-letter identifier. Today, the FAA does not assign any
3-letter identifiers beginning with K, N, Q, W, Y, or Z. An identifier
beginning with W would be assigned only by the FCC. Anything in the local
history about a commercial broadcast station using those letters?

"Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message
link.net...

beginning with W would be assigned only by the FCC. Anything in the local
history about a commercial broadcast station using those letters?

Interesting question but I am not aware of any such history.

--------------------
Richard Kaplan, CFII

www.flyimc.com

John Clear wrote:

South County (Q99) is changing to E16.

1. When?
2. How do you know?

Thanks,

Hilton

"Hilton" wrote in
k.net:

John Clear wrote:

South County (Q99) is changing to E16.

1. When?
2. How do you know?

Thanks,

Hilton




I was informed of this change by the Director of Santa Clara County
Airports by email:

To all users of South County Airport (San Martin, California),
We have been notified by the FAA's National Flight Data Center that
effective on June 10, 2004 the South County Airport Identifier will be
officially changed from Q99 to E16. This change is due to a conflict of
Area Navigation Routes (RNAV) identifiers that begin with the letter "Q"
and airport identifiers that also begin with the letter "Q". The FAA will
notify all aerial chart manufacturers of this change, and new charts and
approach plates are expected to reflect this change in the next series of
publication releases. Please note this change for your records. The
County Airports staff will make the necessary changes in signage, websites
and other County documents as required.
Thanks,

Carl Honaker
Director
Santa Clara County Airports


--
Marty Shapiro
Silicon Rallye Inc.

(remove SPAMNOT to email me)