![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On a side note: I can't claim to be one of Regan's political fans, but watching his draped casket come down the stairs with his widow waiting was indeed a somber moment,, looking at Nancy standing in the rain under the umbrella. Evidently you're not the only one. In the daily Rasmussen tracking poll, Bush & Kerry had been stuck at 45/45 for days. Two days ago that changed to 47/44 in favor of Bush, and it was the same yesterday. I can't think of anything else to explain the bounce save Reagan's death and the consequent TV coverage. Por mi parte, I haven't watched the TV since Baghdad was secured in April 2003. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 05:11:38 -0400, Cub Driver wrote:
Por mi parte, I haven't watched the TV since Baghdad was secured in ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ April 2003. well, there happened some things in the meantime .... :-) #m -- Martin!!! Maaaaartiiiin!!! Can you please flame this guy for me? 'HECTOP' in rec.aviation.piloting |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Evidently you're not the only one. In the daily Rasmussen tracking poll, Bush & Kerry had been stuck at 45/45 for days. Two days ago that changed to 47/44 in favor of Bush, and it was the same yesterday. 47/45 on Saturday night. (The Raz polls interview 500 people a night, and each poll gives the breakdown of the previous three nights, or a total of 1500 people.) Kerry's slight move up came from the Not Sure vote. 53 percent of those polled believe Bush will be re-elected. 54 percent prefer Bush on national defense. 49 percent prefer Bush on the economy. Both these last two are increases over previous days. 43 percent give Bush good marks on Iraq. 41 percent say Bush is doing a good or excellent job on the economy. And 67 percent have a favorable view of Ronald Reagan! I have become addicted to the Rasmussen Tracking Poll. I check it every day at this page http://www.rasmussenreports.com/Pres...cking_Poll.htm all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
+ or - 3 points. Not statistically significant.
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 05:11:38 -0400, Cub Driver wrote: On a side note: I can't claim to be one of Regan's political fans, but watching his draped casket come down the stairs with his widow waiting was indeed a somber moment,, looking at Nancy standing in the rain under the umbrella. Evidently you're not the only one. In the daily Rasmussen tracking poll, Bush & Kerry had been stuck at 45/45 for days. Two days ago that changed to 47/44 in favor of Bush, and it was the same yesterday. I can't think of anything else to explain the bounce save Reagan's death and the consequent TV coverage. Por mi parte, I haven't watched the TV since Baghdad was secured in April 2003. all the best -- Dan Ford email: (put Cubdriver in subject line) The Warbird's Forum www.warbirdforum.com The Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com Viva Bush! www.vivabush.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() While watching the latter, I did encounter a curious errant thought that passed through my mind while watching that casket being carried down the steps with music playing; how, maybe at that same moment in some part of our country there was a widow standing alone by a graveside with only herself (all her friend's and family had passed on), the body of her spouse, a couple of cemetery workers and the minister in attendance and there was no fanfare or special music, yet her loss,, to her,,, was crushing and deeply profound - but most people would never know of the loss of her lifelong partner and would never hear her husband's name. Just the way it is.......... snip Damn,,,, your depressing.... ;-) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "tony" wrote in message ... Former President Reagan's sunset burial had a dissonant note for me. The Navy flew a missing man formation over the site, and as is traditional the second element lead position (the airplane that would have been represented by your ring finger tip as they flew in finger tip formation) left its position, representing the missing man. For this man, this president, tradition should have been broken. The missing man was a Leader. The lead position should have been the vacant one. Is the missing man formation a tradition for Presidential funerals at all? It's traditional for a fallen aviator, but I don't recall it being done for previous Presidents. Reagan did serve in the USAAF, but not as an aviator. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven P. McNicoll" wrote in message nk.net... Is the missing man formation a tradition for Presidential funerals at all? No. The tradition in America dates back to 1938 (the RAF invented it for the funeral of Manfred von Richtofen), but it did not become popular until the 1970s. Reagan is the first President to have died since then and requested military honors. No doubt it will become a permanent tradition for those Presidents that request it. As Commander in Chief of all the armed forces the President is entitled to honors from any branch of the military that he wishes. Not all Presidents request a military funeral like Reagan's; in fact the majority of them do not. Reagan felt that Presidents have a certain ceremonial obligation to honor their office this way, even though in life he was a rather private individual. He felt that the President has a role in society that the individual serving in that office must honor despite personal preferences. Some other living Presidents undoubtedly feel the same way. Both Carter and the elder Bush likely feel that way about the dignity of their office. As for flying the missing man formation with the lead plane missing, it would look odd and possibly be dangerous. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "C J Campbell" wrote in message ... No. I didn't think so. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"tony" wrote in message
... For this man [blah blah blah] Always someone, isn't there? Just can't help posting their off-topic political crap to an aviation newsgroup. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flight of two, IFR | Doug | Instrument Flight Rules | 21 | January 13th 20 01:12 PM |
Four Navy avaitors on San Diego-based carrier listed as missing | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 11th 04 05:03 AM |
missing man formation for Reagan | Paul Hirose | Military Aviation | 1 | June 14th 04 12:50 AM |
Search for missing plane | C J Campbell | Piloting | 2 | March 4th 04 01:42 AM |
Ellery Queen and the Case of the Missing Magneto Gear Teeth | MikeremlaP | Owning | 3 | July 26th 03 03:01 AM |