![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marco Rispoli" wrote in message
Or our own association. GCOPA ... Green Card Owners And Pilots Association. the way AOPA seems to be forgetting us altogether, we may very well have to... by the way, guys, don't forget to write to AOPA and remind them that we do exist, and may be ask whether AOPA can actually afford to antagonize and possibly loose a fair chunk of its membership (the often quoted remark by Phil Boyer, see www.aopa.org, who seems so upset that the new rules from our Truly Silly Administration might possibly affect US citizen, without giving a thought about those among us who have already been veted, and background checked and fingerprinted and whatsnot, really ****ed me off); Only flaw is that sooner or later every one of us will probably become a citizen ... if we ever get a chance to apply; the way things are going, just reading the news, the only foreigners given any slack these days are Saudi terrorists caught in the act... but I digress. --Sylvain |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Sylvain" wrote in message
m... "Marco Rispoli" wrote in message Or our own association. GCOPA ... Green Card Owners And Pilots Association. the way AOPA seems to be forgetting us altogether, we may very well have to... by the way, guys, don't forget to write to AOPA and remind them that we do exist, and may be ask whether AOPA can actually afford to antagonize and possibly loose a fair chunk of its membership (the often quoted remark by Phil Boyer, see www.aopa.org, who seems so upset that the new rules from our Truly Silly Administration might possibly affect US citizen, without giving a thought about those among us who have already been veted, and background checked and fingerprinted and whatsnot, really ****ed me off); I did get an answer back and I didn't like it one bit. Sounded like a pacifier: "we didn't forget about you, we are working on it, we'll give it our best try." Canned response. The food for my cat smells fresher. That's the answer I got from AOPA. My AOPA regional representative instead said that he has a few things he can try and he'll get back to me in a few days ... but things are tough because we are not US Citizens and that's all there is to it. More honest ... I have a couple of things I am going to talk to him about when he gets back to me ... but I have to dust off my green card and my passport and get ready to dish out those 200 bux ... cause I don't think this is going anywhere. Only flaw is that sooner or later every one of us will probably become a citizen ... if we ever get a chance to apply; the way things are going, just reading the news, the only foreigners given any slack these days are Saudi terrorists caught in the act... but I digress. --Sylvain LOL!!! -- Marco Rispoli - NJ, USA / PP-ASEL My on-line aviation community - http://www.thepilotlounge.com |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Montblack" wrote in message
... ("Thomas Borchert" wrote) Quiet, and stand in line over there - we're not done frisking this 80 year old Iowa farmer with Parkinson's disease. You never know!! Them 80 year old farmers are a real danger to national security. Who knows what they are hiding in them purses? You can't imagine how much damage a knitting tool can do. Yep. Makes sense. -- Marco Rispoli - NJ, USA / PP-ASEL My on-line aviation community - http://www.thepilotlounge.com |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Sylvain" wrote in message m... "Marco Rispoli" wrote in message Or our own association. GCOPA ... Green Card Owners And Pilots Association. the way AOPA seems to be forgetting us altogether, we may very well have to... by the way, guys, don't forget to write to AOPA and remind them that we do exist, and may be ask whether AOPA can actually afford to antagonize and possibly loose a fair chunk of its membership (the often quoted remark by Phil Boyer, see www.aopa.org, who seems so upset that the new rules from our Truly Silly Administration might possibly affect US citizen, without giving a thought about those among us who have already been veted, and background checked and fingerprinted and whatsnot, really ****ed me off); Only flaw is that sooner or later every one of us will probably become a citizen ... if we ever get a chance to apply; the way things are going, just reading the news, the only foreigners given any slack these days are Saudi terrorists caught in the act... but I digress. --Sylvain Just go to Mexico and illegally walk across the border into California. You will be given anything you could ever want or need for free. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marco,
Them 80 year old farmers are a real danger to national security. Well, at least they'd have access to large quantities of fertilizer. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marco,
here's the full Boyer response as sent out today: New TSA Interim Rule I apologize in advance for the “group” reply to your personal email, but the number I have received on this issue from non-US citizens is best served by an overall answer. Rest assured that I have personally (mostly over the weekend) read every one of your emails, and also forwarded some of them to staff in our Government and Technical Affairs department who are actively working this issue. Needless to state, this rule hit AOPA and the rest of the industry off-guard. No one expected the surprise rulemaking, even though we were aware that in last year’s VISION 100 Bill, Congress ordered a change in how the agencies were treating flight instruction; with emphasis on over 12,500 pound aircraft, but not limited to such. The intent of Congress is to "screen" non-US citizens receiving training in the US. As your emails pointed out, the implementation of such a requirement has implications not understood by TSA. I appreciate you bringing this to our attention and your concerns about how this affects you. First, I apologize if our web story or e-Pilot gave the impression that as a non-US citizen your AOPA membership means nothing to our advocacy issues. Frankly, I can see how you might have interpreted it that way, and while no excuse, I was in Washington, DC Wednesday through Friday of last week, with an evening speech in Buffalo, NY on Thursday, when e-Pilot is constructed. In the lobby of the building of my speech, I was on the cell phone with my right hand person in G&TA for almost 30 minutes getting a better understanding of this ridiculous interim rule, and in a verbal conversation it was difficult for me to catch the various interpretations our “rush to deadline” story might get from our various constituencies. With that stated, let me clearly state that AOPA is diligently working on all aspects of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) rule. AOPA has been in contact with Transportation Security Administration (TSA) numerous times last week to register our opposition to unilaterally creating a huge burden for U.S. citizen and non-citizen pilots and flight instructors; criticizing their lack of industry input. We immediately placed the interim rule in the hands of AOPA General Counsel John Yodice, for a full interpretation. AOPA staff has already communicated with him on numerous occasions on various aspects of the rule, and I met with John on Wednesday afternoon for an in-person briefing. We expect his completed report sometime today (Mon-Sept 27). This report will form the basis for several actions: 1) Petition the Docket for a delay of the rule, citing it is so ill conceived that the implementation schedule could cause huge chaos. 2) Send a letter to the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security, Admiral David Stone (head of the TSA) an outline of our initial concerns, and ask for a delay in implementation, plus heavy industry consultation. 3) Have AOPA Legislative Affairs in Washington, DC inform members of Congress that the instructions to TSA in their VISION 100 Bill, the genesis of this TSA rulemaking, has been grossly mis-interpreted. 4) I intend to verbally convey this to Admiral David Stone as soon as I can reach him. 5) Our staff meets with the TSA and members of the industry this coming Thursday, in the first in-person discussion and adverse reaction to this rule. Your emails have contained many good comments, and I have assembled them into a booklet for possible use with the TSA on the non-citizen portion of this issue. e-Pilot and our website will contain updates on our actions, and will link to copies of correspondence AOPA has with the TSA, Federal Aviation Administration, and Congress. Rest assured, we (I) will not leave any stone unturned. As mentioned earlier, the United States Congress has directed this agency to formulate a way to provide more security to the flight training environment, with particular regard to non-U.S. citizens. Remember, the tragedy of 9-11-01 did involve such training. But, in all the discussions leading up to this, never did we feel they intended to go this far in this bizarre a manner. Thanks for allowing me to better explain our actions. --Phil -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Thomas Borchert" wrote in message
... Marco, here's the full Boyer response as sent out today: Yep. Got the same. Canned response. I should have expected it. I am talking to my regional AOPA representative (by email) and we'll se where that leads. I didn't have a lot of faith in a reply from Phil Boyer. I am sure he was probably bombarded ... -- Marco Rispoli - NJ, USA / PP-ASEL My on-line aviation community - http://www.thepilotlounge.com |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Marco Rispoli" wrote in message
. .. "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Marco, here's the full Boyer response as sent out today: Yep. Got the same. Canned response. I should have expected it. I am talking to my regional AOPA representative (by email) and we'll se where that leads. I didn't have a lot of faith in a reply from Phil Boyer. I am sure he was probably bombarded ... AOPA's response has hit the docket on dms.dot.gov. It's just 2 pages, primarily a call for delay. Among other numbers they highlight that there are 85,000 certificated resident alien pilots - that's 13% of all. I don't know where they pulled the number from. I think AOPA got the message. Let's get off their case now. -- David Brooks |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for posting this. I was pretty ****ed off by AOPA's original
negligence of permanent residents but it looks like they're actually listening to their members. Anyway, another non-citizen here (nor I intend to be one). -Toly. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Toly,
negligence of permanent residents AND VISITORS! Jeeze! -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Dover short pilots since vaccine order | Roman Bystrianyk | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 29th 04 12:47 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | Military Aviation | 120 | January 27th 04 10:19 AM |
[OT] USA - TSA Obstructing Armed Pilots? | No Spam! | General Aviation | 3 | December 23rd 03 08:53 PM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |