![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 22 Oct 2004 22:55:07 -0500, Andrew Sarangan
wrote in :: Many pilots I know seem to think that this new TSA rule is just the beginning of things to come. Look at the trend. I think they are right; there are going to be many more restrictive measures promulgated by the bureaucracy to restrict the rights of all citizens if the current trend is any indication. Mayor Daley succeeded after a long battle, The city of Chicago is a special case. Consider the fact, that O'Hare Airport was named after the son of "Easy Eddie" O'Hare, mobster Al Capone's attorney (who happened to be "Butch" O'Hare, the Navy's first fighter ace). It's a notoriously lawless place. then the proposal by Mr. Weiner, Mr. Weiner is an uninformed opportunist; he withdrew his absurd measure, and hopefully the scandal concerning his campaign contributions will seal his fate. and now this. The Transportation Security Administration has more money than they know what to do with, and they feel a need to produce something for what we, the "running scared" people, are paying them. As long as we give them the mandate to make us more secure, we're going to see more of this restrictive rulemaking. This fearful attitude of the people of this nation is undermining freedom for which this great nation has stood; we've got to find the courage to go on with business as usual, the way the Brits did during the battle of Britain, without being bullied by our enemies into harming our way of life. People have been trying to get rid of general aviation for quite some time, and they are starting to have success. Provide a few examples those successes. I'm not sure that statement is true. However, with the absurd congestion caused by this nation's airline system's dogged adherence to the 'hub and spoke' route structure, and the necessity for passengers to submit to Gestapo search procedures in order to board an airliner, airline travel appears much less glamorous and desirable when compared to the GA corporate jet. I wouldn't be surprised to find the airlines putting as much pressure as possible to regulate GA airline competition out of existence. It's always about money in the end, isn't it? Many TFR's have now become permament. If the military had their way, there would be no GA flight in this country ... There is some talk about banning all part-91 operations from class B airspace. Please provide a credible citation supporting that statement. If true, it's probably airline/military inspired. The old timers tell me that today's kids are not interested in aviation, because they have taken the fun out of flying. Today there more inexpensive, fun ways to get into the air then ever before. Consider microlite soaring, ultralights, hang gliders, parasails, powered parachutes, trikes, ... all virtually unregulated. However, as the NAS becomes more congested, there will be additional GA restrictions imposed; it's just a matter of physics. How much fun is it for a kid to learn about complex airspaces, TFR's and military interceptions? Ask a flight simulator gamer that question. You wouldn't believe the lengths to which they go. Those would be aviators who find the arcana of aviation too difficult to master can operate under part 103. That paints a gloomy picture for aviation. If all the fun activities of the barnstorming days of aviation were attempted today, the sky would be less safe due to the increased number of aircraft. Times change. The population expands. Bureaucracy grows... The optimist in me tells me that things will turn around. What do you think? I think the current trend will continue. As restrictions are perceived necessary, they will be imposed. Is GA on a inevitable decline, or will it turn around and start to take an even important role in our lives? Fortunately, GA is bigger than the airlines, so there is hope that it can continue, but we've got to get organized and find the funding to make our voice heard in Washington. And we've got to begin to take back much of the nearly 50% of airspace 'owned' by the military. If NASA's SATS is eventually implemented, GA will be as common for the average citizen as Hertz Rent A Car is today. This 21st century is going to be remarkably different from all those past. Hang on... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The air and space around me is
mine.............................................. ....................... I would fight a ban on GA like the NRA fights the ban on guns. And if they ban GA how do they expect to get airline pilots the military???? No government agency can be allowed to suppress your pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness. I am only happy and at peace when I am flying it is my escape some use drugs & alcohol I use an airplane! Ill shut up there. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Future Electronic Attack Aircraft | Mike P. | Military Aviation | 1 | April 22nd 04 01:30 AM |
Message To America's Students: The War, The Draft, Your Future | ~ LITTLE HITLER ~ | Military Aviation | 0 | April 11th 04 11:59 PM |
Future military fighters and guns - yes or no ? | championsleeper | Military Aviation | 77 | March 3rd 04 04:11 AM |
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | December 12th 03 11:01 PM |
UNMANNED, THE WAY OF THE FUTURE | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 11 | November 28th 03 05:02 PM |