A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

GPS Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old November 6th 04, 10:12 PM
Chuck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Schmoe" wrote in message
. net...
"Chuck" wrote in message
m...

whack


It was 2002-2003.

I will admit that my A&P school wasn't very good. I feel that I received

a
poor education dealing with aircraft, but, I was able to pass the O&P's
(off
campus)



I hope you are not working as an A&P. If you are, don't quit your real

job.



Speaking of, out of 25 in our class, I would trust maybe 5 people (including
me, of course) to actually work on an aircraft.

One guy got arrested for drug possession a little while into our 2 year
course, and by the time the 2 years were up, he was working for AA. Another
(suspected - heard him talk about it but never saw it) drug user went to
work for GE Online services.

There were several more that I suspect had a drug habits and several that I
know for a fact have alcohol problems.

Some were just plain ignorant. One guy, I had to show him how to tighten the
chuck on a drill. He had no clue!

In Aviation Science class (if I remember correctly), in the math portion,
the instructor would have each of the 25 students go to the board and do
basic adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. We each had to do 3 or
4 problems of each. This took the entire 2 hour class period.

In Assembly and Rigging, we flew paper airplanes the entire 2 hour class
period. Same instructor as above. Now don't get me wrong, I feel that paper
airplanes are probably a good aid in teaching aerodynamics, but for 2 hours,
and no explanation of aerodynamics???

Most of the instructors had no business teaching aviation. They may be good
in their fields, but they were not good *instructors*.

In basic electricity, I learned more in one day from a substitute
instructor, than I did the whole semester with our regular instructor. We
spent 1, yes, one day learning AC electricity. Same instructor also taught
welding. During the first class period, he informed us that he is not a
welder and knows nothing about welding. I saw him try to weld, and I believe
him! I would show him a welding project and ask what he thought. He would
say that it looked great and to turn it in. I would turn it in and would get
a 70 on it.

Sorry.... I'm on a roll now...

I'm sorry, but that place was a joke.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


  #12  
Old November 7th 04, 01:18 AM
The Weiss Family
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Chuck" wrote in message
. ..
In A&P school several years ago, we were told that GPS was not certified
for
use in aircraft, although they do make a good *aid*.

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become
certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Thanks...

Chuck


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


You know what absolutely blows me away, and I can't wait until it becomes
the new standard?
With WAAS technology, you can fly a GPS approach into an airport that has NO
localizer, NO glideslope, etc.
The GPS will guide you in within 1 meter horizontally and vertically.
I'm only VFR, so some of my terminology may be off, but you get the idea.
How cool is that?

Seems to me that airports could save money because they wouldn't need to
maintain any radio navigation equipment anymore...

Adam
N7966L
Beech Super III


  #13  
Old November 7th 04, 03:07 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

So as an alumni did you pass on this valuable feedback so that the
citizens of Tarrant County and the State of Texas get a good return on
their educational tax dollars??

Dave

Chuck wrote:
"Schmoe" wrote in message
. net...

"Chuck" wrote in message
. com...

whack


It was 2002-2003.

I will admit that my A&P school wasn't very good. I feel that I received


a

poor education dealing with aircraft, but, I was able to pass the O&P's
(off
campus)



I hope you are not working as an A&P. If you are, don't quit your real


job.



Speaking of, out of 25 in our class, I would trust maybe 5 people (including
me, of course) to actually work on an aircraft.

One guy got arrested for drug possession a little while into our 2 year
course, and by the time the 2 years were up, he was working for AA. Another
(suspected - heard him talk about it but never saw it) drug user went to
work for GE Online services.

There were several more that I suspect had a drug habits and several that I
know for a fact have alcohol problems.

Some were just plain ignorant. One guy, I had to show him how to tighten the
chuck on a drill. He had no clue!

In Aviation Science class (if I remember correctly), in the math portion,
the instructor would have each of the 25 students go to the board and do
basic adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing. We each had to do 3 or
4 problems of each. This took the entire 2 hour class period.

In Assembly and Rigging, we flew paper airplanes the entire 2 hour class
period. Same instructor as above. Now don't get me wrong, I feel that paper
airplanes are probably a good aid in teaching aerodynamics, but for 2 hours,
and no explanation of aerodynamics???

Most of the instructors had no business teaching aviation. They may be good
in their fields, but they were not good *instructors*.

In basic electricity, I learned more in one day from a substitute
instructor, than I did the whole semester with our regular instructor. We
spent 1, yes, one day learning AC electricity. Same instructor also taught
welding. During the first class period, he informed us that he is not a
welder and knows nothing about welding. I saw him try to weld, and I believe
him! I would show him a welding project and ask what he thought. He would
say that it looked great and to turn it in. I would turn it in and would get
a 70 on it.

Sorry.... I'm on a roll now...

I'm sorry, but that place was a joke.


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004



  #14  
Old November 7th 04, 03:15 AM
Dave S
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



You know what absolutely blows me away, and I can't wait until it becomes
the new standard?
With WAAS technology, you can fly a GPS approach into an airport that has NO
localizer, NO glideslope, etc.
The GPS will guide you in within 1 meter horizontally and vertically.
I'm only VFR, so some of my terminology may be off, but you get the idea.
How cool is that?

Seems to me that airports could save money because they wouldn't need to
maintain any radio navigation equipment anymore...

Adam
N7966L
Beech Super III



I'm just a private pilot too but dont forget the other parts of the
"instrument approach" structure. The electronic glidepath is only part
of it.

You have to have good lighting as well... if you plan on doing GPS
approaches down to the equivalent of a Cat 1 ILS you will still need to
have the lighting systems and runway markings that allow you to
transition to a visual environment at say 200 feet off the deck when you
break out of the soup. That means you still will need over 1200 linear
feet worth of land that can support it. Don't expect 200 ft minimums to
a 40 x 3000 strip of asphalt with 50 ft obstacles 100 ft from the end
across the fence.

WAAS is good stuff.. and it will open a lot of airports up, not to
mention allow glideslopes to EVERY runway that can support it (without
regard to ILS frequency congestion). But it wont be a hard IFR solution
to every field.

Dave

  #15  
Old November 7th 04, 04:03 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chuck wrote:

In A&P school several years ago, we were told that GPS was not certified for
use in aircraft, although they do make a good *aid*.

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Yes.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #16  
Old November 7th 04, 04:04 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Chuck wrote:

Hmmm... I guess that proves that my A&P school sucked!


Don't know about that, but they were definitely wrong about GPS.

George Patterson
If a man gets into a fight 3,000 miles away from home, he *had* to have
been looking for it.
  #17  
Old November 7th 04, 05:31 AM
Chuck
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dave S" wrote in message
link.net...
So as an alumni did you pass on this valuable feedback so that the
citizens of Tarrant County and the State of Texas get a good return on
their educational tax dollars??

Dave



No I haven't. If I write the school administration with my complaints, I
feel that it will fall on deaf ears. There is so much politics at the
school, it's pitiful...



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.788 / Virus Database: 533 - Release Date: 11/1/2004


  #18  
Old November 7th 04, 08:49 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Chuck,

that I suspect had a drug habits and several that I
know for a fact have alcohol problems.


What's the difference?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #19  
Old November 7th 04, 08:49 AM
Thomas Borchert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

G.R.,

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Yes.


Did it ever HAVE that stance?

--
Thomas Borchert (EDDH)

  #20  
Old November 7th 04, 11:22 AM
Bob Noel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
Thomas Borchert wrote:

Has the FAA changed it's stance on the use of GPS? Has GPS become
certified
to use in navigation in aircraft?


Yes.


Did it ever HAVE that stance?


Yes. There was a time when the use of GPS was not authorized as
a navigation source for IFR operations.

--
Bob Noel
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
VOR/DME Approach Question Chip Jones Instrument Flight Rules 47 August 29th 04 05:03 AM
Legal question - Pilot liability and possible involvement with a crime John Piloting 5 November 20th 03 09:40 PM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM
Partnership Question Harry Gordon Owning 4 August 16th 03 11:23 PM
Got my ticket.... now what (the cross-country question) bdl Piloting 6 July 13th 03 02:06 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.