A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Vertex Handhelds



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 25th 04, 06:02 PM
Jim Weir
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The nice thing about being on the engineering side of the house (as opposed to
the business side) is that my decisions are based on the quality and technical
superiority of one product over another. Business reasons played very little in
my decision.

I considered the Vertex superior in terms of mechanical design and the resultant
reliability. As was pointed out elsewhere, that chicken$#!t advertising 5 watts
RF output (and then in small letters "PEP") isn't far from deceptive
advertising, but that's the way some other companies are doing it and I guess to
be competitive you have to play the game.

Actually, you can't really go wrong with either Vertex or Icom. What I wish
Vertex would do is come out with a permanent panel mount flatpack like the Icom
and then I'd REALLY be happy.

Jim



Cub Driver
shared these priceless pearls of wisdom:

-On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 18:11:12 -0800, Jim Weir wrote:
-
-After a hell of a lot of
-work and research, I settled on Vertex. THe reasons would take me an hour to
-lay out, so I won't.
-
-I would one would appreciate hearing any of them that related to the
-units' performance, durability, etc (as opposed to business reasons).


Jim Weir (A&P/IA, CFI, & other good alphabet soup)
VP Eng RST Pres. Cyberchapter EAA Tech. Counselor
http://www.rst-engr.com
  #2  
Old November 26th 04, 04:12 PM
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Jim Weir wrote in message . ..
As was pointed out elsewhere, that chicken$#!t advertising 5 watts
RF output (and then in small letters "PEP") isn't far from deceptive
advertising, but that's the way some other companies are doing it and I guess to
be competitive you have to play the game.


I think it is deceptive. More than once I've heard somebody saying
that they bought X handheld because it had a 5 watt transmitter.
Several of the companies that sell handhelds are using the gimmick.

Transmit power on most handhelds is about 1.5 watts. The funny part
is that this is plenty of power for the task. You can transmit to the
horizon from jet altitudes with 1.5 watts. When I used a handheld as
a primary radio (1.5 watt w/ external antenna), I had no problem
conversing clearly with Approach when I was 30 miles out. All in all,
transmit power is not a big deal for aviation handhelds.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)
  #3  
Old November 26th 04, 04:20 PM
Jose
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can transmit to the
horizon from jet altitudes with 1.5 watts. [...]
...transmit power is not a big deal for aviation handhelds.


One of the uses of a handheld is to get weather, clearances and such on the ground in winter before starting the hobbs meter. I suspect that this is
where the extra power comes in handy.

Jose
--
Freedom. It seemed like a good idea at the time.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #4  
Old November 25th 04, 11:43 AM
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


Just wondering if anyone here had experience (good or bad) with Vertex
handheld transceivers. I'm about to buy SOMETHING, but I'm not sure whether
or not I'm gonna stick with the standard ICOM.


I've been happy with my Vertex. Right now I'm having problems with its
picking up interference with my Garmin 296; I haven't resolved this
yet, and don't know if it would be better with a different handheld.
(I didn't experience this phenom with my Garmin III+.) On my most
recent flight, I finally turned off the radio while en route, and
turned off the GPS while landing.

all the best -- Dan Ford
email: (put Cubdriver in subject line)

Warbird's Forum
www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum www.pipercubforum.com
the blog www.danford.net
  #5  
Old November 25th 04, 05:05 PM
Malcolm Teas
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jeff Franks" wrote in message ...
Just wondering if anyone here had experience (good or bad) with Vertex
handheld transceivers. I'm about to buy SOMETHING, but I'm not sure whether
or not I'm gonna stick with the standard ICOM.


I bought the VXA-700 and I'm quite happy with it. I've used it twice
now in the air when I've had radio problems (I don't fly with that
club anymore). Once to fly back into the Wash. DC ADIZ. I monitor
local traffic for my own amusement when I'm on the ground with it too.

I like it since it's small and relatively lightweight. It uses a LiON
battery so there's a very long battery life. It has a 5W output which
is good. It's hardy and robust so that it can bang around in the
bottom of my flight bag w/o harm. All of this combined means that
it's easy to carry and will have the power to be useful when I need
it.

If it's NOT easy to carry, then I'm more likely to omit it and not
have it when I need it. A bigger and heavier radio, or one that I
need to carry a backup battery for, is one I'm less likely to have
with me.

I bought the headset adapter for the earphone plug. I often just
leave that attached to the radio. I can move my headset from the
panel to the handheld very quickly if needed. It has the VOR feature,
but I've not had occasion to use that. It also gets weather radio (in
the US), FM broadcast, and 2 meter band.

Ideally, I would prefer a standard earphone/headset plug and standard
antenna plug, but it's a minor issue. I'm willing to live with
external adapters for the sake of the smaller size and lower weight
than ICOM or Sporty's.

The thing is waterproof up to 3 feet under, so rain won't hurt it
either. There are rubber corners for more protection from getting
dropped too.

I live under and fly in and around the ADIZ. Loosing a radio here is
a big deal. Potentially fighter jets and license suspension type of
big deal. Having a robust, powerful, long-life backup radio is a key
part of my strategy. I would recommend the VXA-700.

-Malcolm Teas
  #7  
Old November 28th 04, 02:10 PM
Blueskies
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

My Vertex VXA-210 works just fine...

"Jeff Franks" wrote in message ...
Just wondering if anyone here had experience (good or bad) with Vertex handheld transceivers. I'm about to buy
SOMETHING, but I'm not sure whether or not I'm gonna stick with the standard ICOM.

thanks for any opinions.

jf




 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What's next for Garmin handhelds? NEW 296 MichaelR Piloting 3 March 19th 04 12:50 PM
What's next for Garmin handhelds? Mike Rapoport Piloting 13 March 6th 04 03:58 PM
CAD outline of Rans S6S instrument panel? Rob Turk Home Built 2 October 21st 03 09:27 PM
Handhelds and alkaline batteries Ross Richardson Piloting 44 August 10th 03 12:17 AM
Vertex Standard 700 opinions?? EGWW Owning 3 July 15th 03 01:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.