A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

report a near-collision to FBO owner?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 4th 05, 11:35 PM
Bob Gardner
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

I'll buy all of your argument except the rant about high wing/low wing. Done
it many times without swapping paint. Can't imagine a DE getting upset about
it.

Bob Gardner

"gatt" wrote in message
...

While preflighting the Arrow yesterday afternoon I watched a C172 pull up
through the tiedown T right next to me. Not sure why he didn't stop right
at the chains. Instead, he pulled ahead and stopped.

As he was beginning to push the airplane back, the other FBO C172 darted
in
from behind and took the first guy's parking spot like it was a friggin'
shopping mall parking lot at Christmas.

So, for a second, while I watched, one pilot was pushing his airplane
back,
toward the other, who was moving up on his tail at greater than walking
speek with his engine running. When his prop stopped about 2 feet from
the
first airplane's tail. To the immediate right of the airplanes was the
other FBO tiedown spot, which was perfect empty, because that's where the
2nd aircraft was normally tied down.

The pilot of the first plane decided to walk off his anger. The pilot of
the second acted absolutely oblivious, as if it was the other guy's fault
for almost pushing his airplane back into the guy's prop. He just shrugged
the whole incident off and went about his business. No harm, no foul.
Another pilot came along a bit later and helped the first pilot drag the
airplane to the empty spot right next to them.

Here's the catch: The FBO owner explicitly forbids taxiing in from the
back
because of clearance issues. Specifically, because a newly-minted private
pilot had tried to hotrod the 172 into the tiedown a couple of months ago
and banged wings with the other 172. The damage was between spars, so
the
repair was $900 and some Bondo. Three weeks ago his instructor was
terminated for doing the SAME THING, except, fortunately, he didn't hit
the
wing. Made such a racket jockeying the brakes and the throttle between
airplanes, though, that people complained.

It turns out the pilot who had the collision had done nearly the same
thing
returning from his checkride...except, fortunately, the other plane was a
transient Bonanza. DURING THIS GUY'S CHECKRIDE, his wingtip passed right
over the Bonanza's, and he PASSED.

So in the last couple of months I've seen four people not just break the
FBO
policy, but taxi like idiots all but parallel parking their airplanes
around
others, and near prop-strike that would have showered me with debris, and
both of the FBO Cessnas scratched or dented by a guy who nearly collided
with a Bonanza while passing his checkride.

WTF is going on here?! And how can you even pass a checkride if your wing
passes over the wing of a parked aircraft?

The fellow who runs the FBO is a retired cop, mayor and career Marine.
He's
gonna blow a gasket when he hears about it, but I believe it's my duty to
report what I saw almost happen to his airplanes. Thoughts?

-c




  #2  
Old January 5th 05, 01:45 AM
Colin W Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ditto that.

"Bob Gardner" wrote in message
...
I'll buy all of your argument except the rant about high wing/low wing.

Done
it many times without swapping paint. Can't imagine a DE getting upset

about
it.

Bob Gardner



  #3  
Old January 5th 05, 04:35 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob Gardner" wrote in message news:0fKdndt-

I'll buy all of your argument except the rant about high wing/low wing.

Done
it many times without swapping paint.


Interesting. Wouldn't have even considered it myself. Do you think it's
something you'd want a newly-minted pilot to do?

(I'm biased...it's the same guy that banged the two Cessnas I fly together
only a couple of weeks after his checkride, so I'm not giving him much
slack.)

-c



  #4  
Old January 5th 05, 04:40 PM
Stefan
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

gatt wrote:

I'll buy all of your argument except the rant about high wing/low wing.
Done it many times without swapping paint.


Interesting. Wouldn't have even considered it myself. Do you think it's
something you'd want a newly-minted pilot to do?


Yes. Our students learn to look out of the window and to taxi carefully
right from lesson 1.

Stefan
  #5  
Old January 5th 05, 09:50 PM
Colin W Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"gatt" wrote in message
...

"Bob Gardner" wrote in message news:0fKdndt-

I'll buy all of your argument except the rant about high wing/low wing.

Done
it many times without swapping paint.


Interesting. Wouldn't have even considered it myself. Do you think it's
something you'd want a newly-minted pilot to do?


Just out of curiosity, are you near a densely-populated area where people
need to know how to actually park their cars? I live in Boston and always
get a kick when watching some out-of-towner trying to parallel park who
obviously hasn't done so in at least ten years. The relevance is that the
FBO I used to rent from in the area discouraged "driving in" to tiedowns but
it was not really enforced and even all the instructors did it.

(I'm biased...it's the same guy that banged the two Cessnas I fly together
only a couple of weeks after his checkride, so I'm not giving him much
slack.)


Fair enough. If I was that guy I'd refrain from it for a while too.

-cwk.


  #6  
Old January 6th 05, 04:17 PM
gatt
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Colin W Kingsbury" wrote in message
news:ziZCd.1521

Just out of curiosity, are you near a densely-populated area where people
need to know how to actually park their cars?


Pretty much. Portland, OR.

I live in Boston and always get a kick when watching some out-of-towner

trying to parallel park who obviously hasn't done so in at least ten years.
The relevance is that the
FBO I used to rent from in the area discouraged "driving in" to tiedowns

but
it was not really enforced and even all the instructors did it.


The FBO had no problem with it until the accident occured. Guess the owner
was generous enough to leave just enough rope out there for people to hang
themselves with, and finally somebody did. There's only a few spots where
you can't drive into because of the narrow space between parked airplanes
and a cyclone fence. Further down the line you can park however you want,
but there's a twin and a 182 there, so they have more experience pilots
handling those anyhow.

-c


  #7  
Old January 6th 05, 04:25 AM
steve.t
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

When I was learning to fly, I was learning at two different airports,
one quite crowded and the other quite spacious.

The CFIs in both situations showed me how to manuover past low wing
planes while operating a high wing plane (e.g., our wings overlapped a
few feet).

Now that I fly a Piper, I do the same thing with Cessnas. But I don't
do it at any speed. With the CFIs and now solo this is done at 1/2
walking speed or slower.

Later,
Steve.T
PP ASEL/Instrument

  #8  
Old January 5th 05, 04:07 AM
G.R. Patterson III
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



gatt wrote:

The fellow who runs the FBO is a retired cop, mayor and career Marine. He's
gonna blow a gasket when he hears about it, but I believe it's my duty to
report what I saw almost happen to his airplanes. Thoughts?


A few years ago, somebody crunched the left aileron of my Maule. Damage was over
$1,000 and I missed a couple months of good flying weather. Never did find out
who did it or how.

Report it.

George Patterson
The desire for safety stands against every great and noble enterprise.
  #9  
Old January 5th 05, 04:46 AM
C J Campbell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Report it to the FBO. But don't worry about the high wing passing over the
low wing. It is the natural order of things.


  #10  
Old January 7th 05, 02:07 PM
Brooks Hagenow
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

C J Campbell wrote:
Report it to the FBO. But don't worry about the high wing passing over the
low wing. It is the natural order of things.




LOL!

Maybe I am easily amused but I think that "natural order of things"
comment is pretty good.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
molding plexiglas websites? [email protected] Owning 44 February 17th 05 09:33 PM
12 Dec 2003 - Today’s Military, Veteran, War and National Security News Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 December 12th 03 11:01 PM
Report blames pilots in crash of two Navy jets Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 September 26th 03 01:27 AM
USAF = US Amphetamine Fools RT Military Aviation 104 September 25th 03 03:17 PM
Senator asks Navy for report on pilot Otis Willie Naval Aviation 0 July 17th 03 10:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.