Appropriate punishment for airspace violations?

Applying this procedure to any Airbus aircraft will result in loosing the
tail.
Since it is not a necessary piece of equipment when being hijacked, go for
it!

Allan


"Mark James Boyd" wrote in message
news:3ff75b83$1@darkstar...

Hmmm...

In case of suspected attempts to hijack an airliner:

1. Light the "fasten seatbelt" sign, alert the cabin
that those passengers not wearing a seatbelt will be
killed in ten seconds.

2. Ten seconds later, depressurize the cabin. At
FL 300+, this should do nicely

3. Full left rudder, then full right rudder. Then stabilize
for a few seconds, then invert and repeat. Practice in the
simulator helps.

4. Roll upright, wait a minute, then send the copilot back
in the cabin with the portable oxygen. Using the fire axe,
chop hard at the neck of anyone not belted. Repeat as needed.
Stun guns that shoot projectile darts can also be used.

5. Alternately, continue to use exciting rudder until landing.

I'm guessing future terrorists will be more interested in
renting a large moving van and buying fertilizer...

On 30 Dec 2003 09:10:56 GMT, Gerhard Wesp
wrote:


I'm don't want to praise airspace violations, but the people who ``put
the nails in our coffin'' are those who invent new restrictions without
any sense. E.g., the Restr. areas around German nuclear power plants.
Or the new vigourous controls for GA passengers (also Germany). Or
the abolishment of cockpit visits.

Forget about the tiny German restriction around nuclear power plants.
In France the diameter of the restircted airsapce around a nuclear
power plant is 20 (!) kilometers.

What worries me a lot more than restricted airspace itself is the
extreme stupidity of the people to decide about such measures.

Bye
Andreas