![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() abripl wrote: Others should not have their calls dropped no more than if a person is calling from top of a hill or in a good position seeing different towers. A cell phone "dialogs" with every tower in sight and ties up only ONE channel on each. Not so. The system designer will ensure that every cell within line of sight of hills or other high spots is using a different set of frequencies. It is only when the caller is in line of sight of cells relatively far away (usually 40 to 60 miles) that the call will cause conflicts. George Patterson I prefer Heaven for climate but Hell for company. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
George Patterson wrote:
abripl wrote: Others should not have their calls dropped no more than if a person is calling from top of a hill or in a good position seeing different towers. A cell phone "dialogs" with every tower in sight and ties up only ONE channel on each. Not so. The system designer will ensure that every cell within line of sight of hills or other high spots is using a different set of frequencies. It is only when the caller is in line of sight of cells relatively far away (usually 40 to 60 miles) that the call will cause conflicts. There are algorithms built into the cell selection and re-selection process that mitigate against interference but if the base station receiver can't decode the uplink channel from the mobile then you have a problem. To achieve a usable BER (Bit Error Rate) and acceptable frame loss to set up and maintain calls, all cellular and PCS networks, whether they are CDMA, GSM, TDMA, etc. are designed to a specific C/I+N ratio (Carrier to Interference plus Noise) rather than S/N (Signal to Noise). No operator has as much spectrum as they would like and the principal goal is to lay out the system for maximum frequency "reuse." Over the years this has led to reduction of base station antenna heights (few antennas are more than 100' high in an urban system) and down tilt antennas. Thus, any given channel may be "reused" 10-100 times in a given city. The system design presumes the mobile units to be no higher than the building heights. Any co-channel energy that the unintended base station receiver hears from aircraft will reduce the C/I+N ratio and may lead to dropped calls in that cell. Perhaps more simply,regardless of protocol, if you can't hear your messages over the interference it does not matter how strong the signal is, you can't decode it. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Barbra Olson Story Debunked! Proof Cellphones Work in Aircraft. | G.R. Patterson III | Piloting | 14 | February 4th 05 02:15 AM |
Ping Sport Pilot Barbra Olson Story Debunked! Proof Cellphones Work in Aircraft. | Sport Pilot | Piloting | 0 | January 21st 05 07:05 PM |