![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jsmith wrote:
I cannot personally speak for the "a few hundred miles", but I have experienced mountain wave within ten nm of the lee side of the Appalachians in both North Carolina and Georgia. Maybe I shouldn't say "mountain wave". There is a definite vertical component to the air movement where I live, about 200-300 miles east of the Appalachians in NC, when the wind blows perpendicular to the ridges. If you're flying east-west, you are alternately pulling and pushing to maintain altitude as you pass from crest to trough of the waves. I'm *guessing* the time from push to pull is a minute or so, so that would make the wavelength about 5 nm at Mooney speeds. [Before someone else says it, yes, I know, efficiency can be improved by allowing altitude to vary and just staying trimmed for your airspeed.] Dave Dave Butler wrote: Here in NC you can get mountain waves a few hundred miles downwind from the Appalachians, though I've never experienced anything as severe as the OP describes. I think St Simons is too far south for Appalachian mountain waves, though. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Feb 2005 18:19:31 -0800, "Bravo8500"
wrote: I thought this was interesting so I'll share it. I hit some unusual windshear snip By this time I've disengaged the ap and now am allowing the airplane to drop to maintain around 80. I'm just about to call ATC when we start picking up airspeed, slowly. Man, that was weird. Why were you going to call ATC? Declare an emergency? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For one, I was going to tell them I wasn't able to hold altitude, I was
already 200 below assigned. Also, I was thinking about turning around, changing directions or something, I was kind of at a loss for what to do next. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Nathan Young" wrote Why were you going to call ATC? Declare an emergency? Naah. With stuff like that goin' on, I'd tell him I was gonna go ahead and crash, and quit fightin' it! ;-) -- Jim in NC |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Feb 2005 18:19:31 -0800, "Bravo8500"
wrote: This is just the way wind shear works. Yes, it's an extreme example, but I've stalled in level flight at Va on a beautiful clear day. The first clue to extreme shear conditions is the large change in direction in a relatively small change in altitude. If you cruise at 165 into a 40 knot head wind and abruptly enter a 40 knot tail wind you are going to lose 80 knots. If you have the altitude it will eventually end up at the original cruise. OTOH if you went from a 40 knot tail wind to a 40 knot head wind abruptly, can you imagine what that would do to the plane. You not only would have some extreme turbulence, but would temporarily hit close to 240 knots which is well above Vne. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com I thought this was interesting so I'll share it. I hit some unusual windshear I suppose last night going into St. Simmon's Island, GA (BQK) in an A36 Bonanza. Here we were, me flying and the non-pilot owner (my brother-in-law) in the right seat cruising at 3000 over the top of a broken layer about 25 south of the localizer to runway 7, about 9:30 EST. We were in moderate to occasionally severe turbulance and I had been warned by the FSS briefer about a windshear at 1000 agl - I think it was the fact that there was a 180 degree diff in wind direction between the surface and 1000 agl that was causing it. Oh yeah, a big fat low pressure was sitting right on top of BQK, more or less, as I could determine from the duats graphical current analysis in the motel room an hour later. The pressure had been dropping since Atlanta and the altimeter was down to 29.68 I believe. Anyway, here we are in flat out cruise, I look up and notice I'm only indicating 140 or so when I should see 165, and dropping a couple of knots per second. As the airspeed goes through 110, I bring in full RPM and manifold and we continue to lose airspeed down to 80 knots. I'm wondering what the heck is going on, we're now in a climb attitude and get one blip of the stall warning. By this time I've disengaged the ap and now am allowing the airplane to drop to maintain around 80. I'm just about to call ATC when we start picking up airspeed, slowly. Man, that was weird. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Roger" wrote in message ... On 28 Feb 2005 18:19:31 -0800, "Bravo8500" wrote: This is just the way wind shear works. Yes, it's an extreme example, but I've stalled in level flight at Va on a beautiful clear day. The first clue to extreme shear conditions is the large change in direction in a relatively small change in altitude. If you cruise at 165 into a 40 knot head wind and abruptly enter a 40 knot tail wind you are going to lose 80 knots. If you have the altitude it will eventually end up at the original cruise. OTOH if you went from a 40 knot tail wind to a 40 knot head wind abruptly, can you imagine what that would do to the plane. You not only would have some extreme turbulence, but would temporarily hit close to 240 knots which is well above Vne. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com Roger, your experience and mine are pretty much the same, but reversed. I dropped through the turbulence of the shear from a 40+ tailwind into calm air in just a matter of a few seconds. The result was an almost instant increase in airspeed. The increased lift jammed me back up through the shear -- It was almost like I had bounced off of something. The plane didn't stall when it went back to the upper level, but thinking back it could have, if I'd've lost enough forward speed. In any case it was a hell of a ride for a bit. I still had to go through the shear to get down to pattern altitude. On the next trip down, I throttled back to just above stall. When I went through the shear, I shoved the nose down and cut the throttle all the way back -- then recovered into normal flight when things settled down. What I should have paid more attention to was when my whiz-wheel told me I had a ground speed of 155 knots. In a C-150. I dismissed it at the time as manipulating the dials wrong. I wasn't going to quarrel with the original poster over his assessment of his conditions, but his was more like flying into a severe sink than into a shear. Especially with his description of the airspeed bleeding off over minutes while the autopilot tried to compensate. He did a good job of coping with it in any case. I'm just picking on calling it a shear. Casey Wilson Freelance Writer and Photographer |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Felt like a sink, but I've never heard that term, only windshear.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bravo8500" wrote in message oups.com... Felt like a sink, but I've never heard that term, only windshear. We use it mostly in gliders -- sometimes referred to as a downdraft by power pilots. Glider guiders call updrafts "lift." Typically measured on a vario(meter) in fps or knots. The only difference between a vario and an VSI is the vario usually beeps. The pitch and period of the beeps sort of indicate the velocity. Lift and sink work together -- somewhere in the vicinity there was a rising volume of air. You were unlucky enough to fly into the negative half. Sorry if that seems patronizing or pedantic. That brings up an autopilot question you might answer for me. If you had not disconnected the autopilot, could it have taken you into a stall? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Downdraft, shear, microburst - bad! The ap I use (kfc200) only knows to
hold altitude, it doesn't care about airspeed, so it will gladly stall it for you. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 04 Mar 2005 01:53:44 GMT, "Casey Wilson" N2310D @ gmail.com
wrote: "Bravo8500" wrote in message roups.com... Felt like a sink, but I've never heard that term, only windshear. We use it mostly in gliders -- sometimes referred to as a downdraft by power pilots. Glider guiders call updrafts "lift." Typically measured on a vario(meter) in fps or knots. The only difference between a vario and an VSI is the vario usually beeps. The pitch and period of the beeps sort of indicate the velocity. Lift and sink work together -- somewhere in the vicinity there was a rising volume of air. You were unlucky enough to fly into the negative half. Sorry if that seems patronizing or pedantic. That brings up an autopilot question you might answer for me. If you had not disconnected the autopilot, could it have taken you into a stall? That depends on the AP, but mine (IF set to altitude hold) will just keep pulling the nose up until it quits flying. That means you need to know your power settings when doing a step down approach,.Altitude hold off, power back (by the numbers), gear down (depends), flaps (maybe), lead the altitude with power, with the power back to the proper setting for the approach, turn the altutude hold back on. BTW, the FAA defines wind shear as *any* abrupt change in wind direction or speed. That includes up and down. Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Weird Experimental Certificate wording - Normal? | Noel Luneau | Soaring | 7 | January 11th 05 02:53 PM |
On windshear | Ramapriya | Piloting | 8 | January 8th 05 08:02 PM |
Weird stuff over New Jersey | G.R. Patterson III | Piloting | 5 | October 23rd 04 06:49 PM |
Weird Emergencies | SelwayKid | Rotorcraft | 18 | April 19th 04 11:33 PM |
Weird radio "problem" | Michael 182 | Owning | 2 | August 20th 03 06:29 PM |