After the Downing Street Memo: Case for Impeachment Builds

In article ,
Merlin Dorfman wrote:

In rec.aviation.military Charlie Wolf wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2005 23:20:35 +0000 (UTC), Merlin Dorfman
wrote:

In rec.aviation.military W. D. Allen Sr. wrote:
Oh, bring "impeachment" on! We can't wait to see Hillary to paint herself
into a corner by touting the impeachment of a president when she and her
felon husband are not yet out from under the clouds of criminality hanging
over them! Impeachment is not a subject she is wise to bring up since it
will certainly motivate so many people to dredge up all her and Willie's
connivances! Just think they will re-plow Whitewater, Lewinsky, Aspirin
factory attacks, etc., again! We will look forward to the fight,
especially
just before the 2008 presidential election!!!!

It continually amazes me that lying about a blowjob is put in
the same category as causing the needless deaths of over 1500
Americans an countless Iraqis.

1. They aren't needless if you have a brain in your ****ing head.
But by characterizing them as "needless deaths", I guess we know
positively that you support the terrorists that are killing Americans.

I categorically oppose the terrorists that killed Americans,
which is why I opposed the invasion of Iraq. It took attention and
resources away from the war on terror.

You see, most people understand that there is a lot more to the WoT than
just Al Qaeda.

(I've seen figures that 70% of Americans believe Saddam was
personally involved in 9/11. And that that that belief apparently
has a strong correlation with watching Fox News.)

And the Flat Earth Society issues figures that it believes, too.

Doesn't make either statement correct.