![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:37:16 -0700, Richard Riley
wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 13:07:54 -0400, "Kyle Boatright" wrote: Eclipse is going up against a player - Cessna - that dominates that segment of the market. They're going in with 2 things - a much lower price point, and a small technical advantage. Meanwhile Cessna has a well established name, product line, production facilities, dealers, repair facilities, diversified product line and deep pocket corporate parents. Does Eclipse have the money to stay alive in a price war with Cessna? Bill Gates is the 2nd major investor in Eclipse... One can guess who the #1 investor is... http://www.eclipseaviation.com/inthe...content_id=760 Who knows what his commitment level is, but if he is dedicated, money will not be an issue. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() What is your reaction to this plane? It's the next doctor killer. No matter how much training, you can't be a professional pilot flying a hundred hours or so with your mind on other avocations. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Don Hammer" wrote in message
news:1120503614.9d7845ef9042c76b51f36dc25d66bf98@t eranews... What is your reaction to this plane? It's the next doctor killer. No matter how much training, you can't be a professional pilot flying a hundred hours or so with your mind on other avocations. It's probably less complex (i.e., easier to fly) than a piston twin. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Neil Gould" wrote Evolved from... what? What other VLJs will be delivered within the next year? Evolutionary compared with turboprop performance and price. Cirrus, I don't see a company's history as a very good predictor of their future success. People will buy the aircraft that they think represents a The odds of Cessna being around in 20 years are outstanding. Even if the Mustang is not a rousing success, it will still be supported by Cessna. Cessna still continues to support every plane it ever made. The odds of Eclipse being around in 20 years are unknown. better choice for their mission, and since the VLJ market will be at least in part defined by return on investment, I think that planes costing I gather that means you believe in the concept of hundreds or more Eclipse air taxis? Now that is very much an unproven business model. It is even more of an unproven business model when you start calculating the payload of an Eclipse. Charter operations almost never make a profit if the capital investment in an airplane are considered; there are so many people who want to buy an airplane that the free market has reduced charter costs such that a charter airplane returns a modest return on incremental hourly costs but no return on capital costs. I have yet to see a realistic spreadsheet of any Part 135 charter operation which results in a net profit including both the cost of capital and operating costs; there is no reason to believe the Eclipse will be any different. -------------------- Richard Kaplan www.flyimc.com |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nathan Young wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 10:37:16 -0700, Richard Riley wrote: On Mon, 4 Jul 2005 13:07:54 -0400, "Kyle Boatright" wrote: Eclipse is going up against a player - Cessna - that dominates that segment of the market. They're going in with 2 things - a much lower price point, and a small technical advantage. Meanwhile Cessna has a well established name, product line, production facilities, dealers, repair facilities, diversified product line and deep pocket corporate parents. Does Eclipse have the money to stay alive in a price war with Cessna? Bill Gates is the 2nd major investor in Eclipse... One can guess who the #1 investor is... http://www.eclipseaviation.com/inthe...content_id=760 Who knows what his commitment level is, but if he is dedicated, money will not be an issue. Bill is dedicated to making money. If Eclipse doesn't make money in a reasonable time frame, I'll bet his "dedication" will quickly fade... Matt |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You can still buy a MUCH better used Learjet for the same money.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote in message ... ("Mike Rapoport" wrote) It sounds great but the price has already risen almost 40% (in constant dollars) for the initial $840K. I know of more than one person that put down a deposit and won't be able to pay for the airplane unless they win the lotto. Can they sell their spot in line - thus getting back their deposit and making a little on the side? BTW, what were the price guarantees for the early deposit people? I would think they'd get a price break vs. someone deciding, today, that they want an Eclipse. Montblack I suppose that depends on how many people are in the same situation. Mike MU-2 |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() It's probably less complex (i.e., easier to fly) than a piston twin. I agree, but that twin doesn't go 400 kts either. Easier to fly doesn't help the judgment issue when things are happening fast. Thurman Munson had the full Flight Safety course before he flew his Citation into the ground. Probably was thinking of his next baseball contract instead of the best way to shoot an ILS. How many Malibu's and Bonanza's have come out of the clouds minus their wings? Those are singles easier to operate than any complex twin. It is my observation and the NTSB's that it is the non-professional pilots who lack the experience and singular focus of professional pilots that find themselves victims of those accidents, through no fault of the airframe. Unfortunately I think you will see the same pattern with privately operated VLJ's |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Cessna Mustang engines are 50% higher thrust than the versions used in
the Eclipse. I'm sure they are much more expensive. "Richard Riley" wrote in message ... They're now using the same engines (at the same cost to them) as Cessna. .... |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Don Hammer" wrote
It is my observation and the NTSB's that it is the non-professional pilots who lack the experience and singular focus of professional pilots that find themselves victims of those accidents, through no fault of the airframe. If by "professional" you mean full-time pilot, then I believe this is your opinion and not that of NTSB. If by "professional" you mean a pilot who is well-trained, proficient, well-equipped, and following sound risk management procedures, then yes, you are correct. -------------------- Richard Kaplan www.flyimc.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eclipse Aviation Engineering opportunities | [email protected] | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | April 2nd 05 08:31 PM |
Eclipse flies again! | Mike Murdock | Owning | 0 | January 1st 05 12:38 AM |
Eclipse 500 Direct Operating Cost | Bravo8500 | Owning | 2 | December 18th 04 03:27 AM |
Diamond Eclipse Prop | scott sher | Piloting | 1 | November 2nd 04 12:53 PM |
Eclipse Jet | john smith | Piloting | 7 | October 10th 04 02:34 AM |