![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I got burned by this one- have to have the engine yanked on my Extra and
sent away for who knows how long. Oh, man, Jim -- that really sucks. On the other hand, if Lycoming is REALLY having trouble with crankshafts failing, I would think that an Extra would be the LAST plane you would want to fly with a weak link behind the propeller. Please keep us posted. I'd be curious to know how Lycoming handles this. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That bites the big one Jim... Sorry to hear that... Our IO-360-A3B6D was
rebuilt in 03/01 but doesn't match any of the serial numbers.... Praise the Lord!! :-) Jon Kraus '79 Mooney 201 Jim N. wrote: I got burned by this one- have to have the engine yanked on my Extra and sent away for who knows how long. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Also, the Extra has an MT composite prop, which has to be pulled and
overhauled every 6 years. I plan on having the engine pulled this coming January when it's too cold to fly the Extra anyway, but the next question is whether to do the prop a the same time (claimed downtime is three weeks and around $3,500) or wait until next year when the prop is actually due. (which means another month of downtime again) The worst part is that the engine has been running well- it never even needs a quart between every 25 hour oil change, the compressions are solid, and it idles and starts well. All this is on an engine that has no air filter and is asked to go from 2700 rpm to idle and back again many times during a practice session. The prop is also clean and has no nicks, and doesn't leak any grease. However, it has to be pulled every six years, crated, and sent to Florida for overhall, then returned, remounted, and rebalanced. Oh well, it's just a toy and there doesn't seem to be much choice in the matter. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 19-Jul-2005, "Jim N." wrote: Oh well, it's just a toy and there doesn't seem to be much choice in the matter. Man, I really feel for you. What a dismal set of choices. Of course, as of now the SB is just that, and legally you aren't required to do anything. But everybody seems to feel that an AD is on the way. The SB calls for pulling affected engines within 50 hours or 6 months, whichever occurs first. At least you have a few ours to "burn" during the good summer and fall acro weather. The folks I REALLY feel for are owners of affected planes that rely on them regularly for business use and/or rental revenues. I think Lycoming ought to give some consideration to those cases -- -Elliott Drucker |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
crankshaft counterweights | Dave Butler | Owning | 10 | February 10th 05 04:08 PM |
Lycoming 0-360 factory overhaul core charges - Does Air Powertell the truth ? | Mike Spera | Owning | 6 | December 13th 04 01:13 AM |
Lycoming remote oil filter | Evan Carew | Home Built | 0 | November 5th 04 10:09 PM |
Lycoming Sued | jls | Home Built | 0 | February 13th 04 02:01 PM |
Lycoming 320 and EAA Light Sport Aircraft ? | Dave Jackson | Home Built | 29 | October 20th 03 01:20 AM |