A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Two nearby ASOS broadcasts on the same frequency: Why no squeal?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old August 11th 05, 01:19 AM
Icebound
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Peter R." wrote in message
...
....

In any case, I am curious how it is possible for two transmissions to be
heard over an aviation frequency without the squeal (I forgot the
appropriate technical term for this).



The "squeal" that you refer to, is the absolute difference in frequency
between the two base carriers of the two different transmitters. This
"difference" is known as the "beat" frequency. If the two base-carrier
frequencies are exactly correct, then the difference would be zero and no
"beat" sound would be produced. Today's equipment... it is normal to
maintain transmitter frequencies very, very accurate.

The human ear does not hear very well below about 20 hertz, so a tiny
difference of 5 or 10 hertz would not produce any "sound", either...
although it may manifest itself as a quick "pulsing" in the volume of the
signals as your receiver attempts to handle the interfering signals.


  #12  
Old August 11th 05, 05:34 PM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The squeal heard when two pilots key up on the same frequency is called
a heterodyne. I assume this is similar?

  #13  
Old August 11th 05, 06:20 PM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yes. The heterodyne effect occurs because both transmitters differ in
frequency by some audio tone. The allowable frequency error (from the
center of the design channel center) is +/- .003%. Assuming a transmitter
on 123.0 MHz. this means that one transmitter can be about 3700 Hz. (3.7
KHz.) high and one can be 3.7 kHz. low and still be within specification.
The beat note (heterodyne) between them is (3.7+3.7) 7.4 kHz. and this is
the tone you hear.

The odds of two radios being off to the limits at opposite ends of the
limits is very low; most of the heterodynes you hear will be in the 500-3000
Hz. range.

Having said that, since power consumption for a ground station is not a
primary concern, you can put the electronic device that controls frequency
into a temperature chamber (crystal oven) and expect that day in and day out
it will be within a few Hz. of where it was originally set. The same is
true of the other ground (ASOS) station, so the beat between them will be
very low and probably subaudible in an aviation headset. You may, if you
listen carefully hear a low rumble or (if they are very close) a wha-wha-wha
at one wha per second or so.

Wha is a technical term. You'll pick it up as you go along.

Jim



wrote in message
oups.com...
The squeal heard when two pilots key up on the same frequency is called
a heterodyne. I assume this is similar?



  #14  
Old August 11th 05, 06:22 PM
Ron Parsons
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

In article ,
"Peter R." wrote:

For some reason known only to the FAA, both Dunkirk, NY (KDKK), and
Wellsville, NY (KELZ), two small, uncontrolled airports in southwestern NY
state that are about 60 nm apart, share the same ASOS frequency.

For pilots flying to Dunkirk from the east, retrieving the current ASOS
broadcast is not possible until about 25nm east of the airport, due to the
more powerful KELZ broadcast. This is not so much a problem when
conditions are VFR, but when they are IFR I prefer to retrieve the ASOS as
early as possible in order to choose and prepare for a particular
instrument approach.

In any case, I am curious how it is possible for two transmissions to be
heard over an aviation frequency without the squeal (I forgot the
appropriate technical term for this).


It's not unusual for a chain of transmitters to broadcast on what
appears to be the same frequency. They are actually all set about 5khz
apart and aviation radios filter out the squeal. That filter also makes
it more difficult to hear the higher pitched female voice.
  #15  
Old August 11th 05, 07:51 PM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Say what? So far as I am aware, that is just not true.

Jim

"Ron Parsons" wrote in message
...

It's not unusual for a chain of transmitters to broadcast on what
appears to be the same frequency. They are actually all set about 5khz
apart and aviation radios filter out the squeal. That filter also makes
it more difficult to hear the higher pitched female voice.



  #16  
Old August 11th 05, 08:07 PM
Dave Butler
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Parsons wrote:
That filter also makes
it more difficult to hear the higher pitched female voice.


Where can I get one of those?
  #17  
Old August 11th 05, 10:43 PM
john smith
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Ron Parsons wrote:
That filter also makes it more difficult to hear the higher pitched
female voice.


Dave Butler wrote:
Where can I get one of those?


Does it work on spouses and kids?
  #18  
Old August 11th 05, 10:56 PM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You've got more than one spouse?

Jim




"john smith" wrote in message
. ..
Ron Parsons wrote:
That filter also makes it more difficult to hear the higher pitched
female voice.


Dave Butler wrote:
Where can I get one of those?


Does it work on spouses and kids?



  #19  
Old August 11th 05, 11:07 PM
Steven P. McNicoll
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"john smith" wrote in message
. ..

Does it work on spouses and kids?


If the plural of mouse is mice, why isn't the plural of spouse spice?


  #20  
Old August 11th 05, 11:11 PM
Newps
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Dave Butler wrote:

Ron Parsons wrote:

That filter also makes it more difficult to hear the higher pitched
female voice.



Where can I get one of those?



Every man gets issued one at birth.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAP & RAH Oshkosh field frequency RST Engineering Owning 24 July 23rd 05 03:42 AM
RAP & RAH Oshkosh field frequency RST Engineering Piloting 20 July 23rd 05 03:42 AM
Boston Approach frequency question John R Piloting 6 June 22nd 04 08:22 PM
Picking up ATC from 300 NM away? Frequency bleed? Peter R. Piloting 10 August 21st 03 02:32 PM
And they say the automated Weather Station problems "ASOS" are insignificant because only light aircraft need Weather Observations and forecasts... Roy Piloting 4 July 12th 03 04:03 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.