ZZZZZZ OK Chuck, here is the ammo you have been waiting for.

How about small claims?

Find 5 people willing to testify that they would have bought one of your
planes, but didn't because of what they read by Zoom. Your profit on one
plane is $1000, so the total damages in $5000.


"ChuckSlusarczyk" wrote in message
...
In article , Ron Wanttaja
says...

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:49:29 GMT, "Steve Foley"

wrote:

Chuck,

Can't you find one of those ambulance chasers that advertise on daytime
television to take a libel case on contingency?

To interest any lawyer in a contingency case, there has to be a "deep
pocket"
somewhere for any judgement to be paid from. And there isn't any, here.

Ron's right the only way I could get an attorney to take a case like this
is to
pay for it out of pocket.And even if I win a judgment I would have to try
to
collect. zoom knows this and in this regard he has a certain amount of
protection in doing what he does. Some day when I have some spare $1000's
to
spend I may sue just on principle.

In the meantime I will do what I can to expose him for what he is, a Phony
and a
liar and I can prove that.

See ya

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret

ChuckSlusarczyk wrote:
In article , Ron Wanttaja says...

On Wed, 07 Sep 2005 19:49:29 GMT, "Steve Foley"
wrote:


Chuck,

Can't you find one of those ambulance chasers that advertise on daytime
television to take a libel case on contingency?

To interest any lawyer in a contingency case, there has to be a "deep pocket"
somewhere for any judgement to be paid from. And there isn't any, here.


Ron's right the only way I could get an attorney to take a case like this is to
pay for it out of pocket.And even if I win a judgment I would have to try to
collect. zoom knows this and in this regard he has a certain amount of
protection in doing what he does. Some day when I have some spare $1000's to
spend I may sue just on principle.

In the meantime I will do what I can to expose him for what he is, a Phony and a
liar and I can prove that.

See ya

Chuck S RAH-14/1 ret


Y'know, Chuck, I'm willing to bet several of us would be willing to
chip in for a legal fund. See if you can get zoom deposed on videotape
if you can't get the trial taped. I don't know if it would be legal to
sell the tapes, but I'd buy a set It would be even more fun if yawn
was also on tape.

BTW, has anyone contacted the Florida chapter of Angel Flight to see
if he's really flying for them?

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On 6 Sep 2005 16:31:12 -0700, "BobR" wrote:

ANN Is Posting Breaking Stories, In REALTIME... Stay Tuned!

Bozo Of The Week


Yup... he's STILL at it. Chuck Slusarczyk of CGS Aviation

Here's some of what Kevin O'Brien had to say about the situation:

"I like Jim. I think he's a great guy who has done a lot for aviation,
and for years he did fulfill the promise of being 'proof that
magazines
don't have to be boring.' He didn't fulfill a lot of other promises
though, notably to subscribers and creditors. And I think he has some
severe issues with how he perceives himself, the world, and the other
people in it. His reality isn't real reality all the time. Now, many
people are a lot less pro-Jim than I. Some of them have very good
reason to be. While he has the balls to take on things that are real
problems
(Piper Tomahawk, Revolution Helicopter) he has not always had good
judgment about who to take on, and when he attacks someone who doesn't
deserve it (CGS [Chuck Slusarczyk], the Berkut folks, for a couple of
examples) he hurts real people, innocent people, in real ways. People
still tell Chuck 'But I read in USAviator...' and here Chuck is a guy
who is practically an icon in the ultralight world and honest as the
day is long."

http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...e=source&hl=en

Apparently all the ANN headquarter's hallucinogenic water that Kevin
was too smart to drink is now being shipped to Juan in PR. :-)

Wayne

"wmbjk" wrote in message
...

Apparently all the ANN headquarter's hallucinogenic water that Kevin
was too smart to drink is now being shipped to Juan in PR. :-)

Notice Kevin still writes for ANN, even after Chuck tried to covince him
otherwise. Apparently, someone's conclusions aren't worth the neurons used
up to reach them.

On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 19:15:28 -0400, "Juan Jimenez"
wrote:

"wmbjk" wrote in message
.. .

Apparently all the ANN headquarter's hallucinogenic water that Kevin
was too smart to drink is now being shipped to Juan in PR. :-)

Notice Kevin still writes for ANN, even after Chuck tried to covince him
otherwise. Apparently, someone's conclusions aren't worth the neurons used
up to reach them.

It's clear that Kevin heard both sides of the story, felt the need to
set the record straight, and wrote a definitive statement of his
position. He wrote - "I think he zoom has some severe issues with
how he perceives himself, the world, and the other people in it. His
reality isn't real reality all the time". He also wrote - "when he
zoom attacks someone who doesn't deserve it (CGS [Chuck Slusarczyk],
the Berkut folks, for a couple of examples) he hurts real people,
innocent people, in real ways. People still tell Chuck 'But I read in
USAviator...' and here Chuck is a guy who is practically an icon in
the ultralight world and honest as the day is long."
http://tinyurl.com/cw5lw

There isn't a shred of doubt - his opinion about Chuck is *entirely*
at odds with your own. I for damned sure know which one of you I
believe, and in fact AFAIK, you've failed to convince a single reader
of your position despite hundreds of attempts.

In another post http://tinyurl.com/8awz2 we find Kevin writing -
"questions some have prematurely raised about the
aircraft -- an aircraft that has flown tens of thousands of hours (at
least) by hundreds and hundreds of pilots (at least) over 20+ years --
can be laid to rest. They should not have been raised". I believe that
*you* are the person he's talking about, since you were the only one
raising questions here. Yet you're still at it despite his admonition.
Apparently you're too dense to take a hint, so I wish he'd make his
position clear about *your* grip on reality. I'm thinking that the
only reason he hasn't yet is because nobody takes you seriously
anyway.

Wayne

Wayne,

Very well put but like Zoom, Jaun remains in denial. His mind is
ALWAYS MADE UP and he refuses to let any fact confuse him.




wmbjk wrote:
On Fri, 9 Sep 2005 19:15:28 -0400, "Juan Jimenez"
wrote:

"wmbjk" wrote in message
.. .

Apparently all the ANN headquarter's hallucinogenic water that Kevin
was too smart to drink is now being shipped to Juan in PR. :-)

Notice Kevin still writes for ANN, even after Chuck tried to covince him
otherwise. Apparently, someone's conclusions aren't worth the neurons used
up to reach them.

It's clear that Kevin heard both sides of the story, felt the need to
set the record straight, and wrote a definitive statement of his
position. He wrote - "I think he zoom has some severe issues with
how he perceives himself, the world, and the other people in it. His
reality isn't real reality all the time". He also wrote - "when he
zoom attacks someone who doesn't deserve it (CGS [Chuck Slusarczyk],
the Berkut folks, for a couple of examples) he hurts real people,
innocent people, in real ways. People still tell Chuck 'But I read in
USAviator...' and here Chuck is a guy who is practically an icon in
the ultralight world and honest as the day is long."
http://tinyurl.com/cw5lw

There isn't a shred of doubt - his opinion about Chuck is *entirely*
at odds with your own. I for damned sure know which one of you I
believe, and in fact AFAIK, you've failed to convince a single reader
of your position despite hundreds of attempts.

In another post http://tinyurl.com/8awz2 we find Kevin writing -
"questions some have prematurely raised about the
aircraft -- an aircraft that has flown tens of thousands of hours (at
least) by hundreds and hundreds of pilots (at least) over 20+ years --
can be laid to rest. They should not have been raised". I believe that
*you* are the person he's talking about, since you were the only one
raising questions here. Yet you're still at it despite his admonition.
Apparently you're too dense to take a hint, so I wish he'd make his
position clear about *your* grip on reality. I'm thinking that the
only reason he hasn't yet is because nobody takes you seriously
anyway.

Wayne