A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Punch test?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 7th 05, 02:38 AM
Ernest Christley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Michael Horowitz wrote:
the punch test on fabric... are the results a go/no-go decision, or
can an A&P make a determination as to how long the covering will last
based on the test? - Mike


Mike, I haven't read RAH in a few days, and I'm just now catching up,
but your question has drawn a emphatic response from Jim Weir, R.S.
Hoover, AND Cy Galley that you should replace the fabric.

I've been reading this group for a while now, and think I have learned
who knows what they're talking about and who might blow a little smoke
now and then. I would have to say that this is a unique situation.
Dude, if you value your hide, you better ground that plane until the
fabric is replaced no matter how much it cost.

--
This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against
instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make
mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their
decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)."
  #2  
Old October 8th 05, 04:11 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Ernest Christley wrote:
Michael Horowitz wrote:

the punch test on fabric... are the results a go/no-go decision, or
can an A&P make a determination as to how long the covering will last
based on the test? - Mike



Mike, I haven't read RAH in a few days, and I'm just now catching up,
but your question has drawn a emphatic response from Jim Weir, R.S.
Hoover, AND Cy Galley that you should replace the fabric.

I've been reading this group for a while now, and think I have learned
who knows what they're talking about and who might blow a little smoke
now and then. I would have to say that this is a unique situation.
Dude, if you value your hide, you better ground that plane until the
fabric is replaced no matter how much it cost.

Just because the fabric is 25 years old does not mean that it needs
replacement.
It means that it needs a good close inspection, which includes punch
testing.
Is the dope cracked anywhere? Anywhere there is a crack there could be
UV damage.
Check for ringworm, pretty much the same thing as cracking. Get inside
it on a bright day and see where the light comes through the fabric.
Look for loose spots where the glue may have come loose. Squeeze the
training edges of the control surfaces and see if there is any
crunchyness. That will indicate corrosion.
Discoloration of the dope along metal parts will indicate rust.

If it all seems good, buy it with the understanding that it may need
recovering in the next few years and the price should reflect that.

But like all old aircraft, it's not so much age but condition.


Dave
  #3  
Old October 8th 05, 02:44 PM
Cy Galley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

How can one take a ONE word answer to the question... "will the punch test
tell how much longer the fabric will last?" and turn it into replace the
fabric is beyond me!
--
Cy Galley - Chair,
Air Emergency Aircraft Repair
A Service Project of Chapter 75
EAA Safety Programs Editor - TC
EAA Sport Pilot

wrote in message ...


Ernest Christley wrote:
Michael Horowitz wrote:

the punch test on fabric... are the results a go/no-go decision, or
can an A&P make a determination as to how long the covering will last
based on the test? - Mike



Mike, I haven't read RAH in a few days, and I'm just now catching up, but
your question has drawn a emphatic response from Jim Weir, R.S. Hoover,
AND Cy Galley that you should replace the fabric.

I've been reading this group for a while now, and think I have learned
who knows what they're talking about and who might blow a little smoke
now and then. I would have to say that this is a unique situation. Dude,
if you value your hide, you better ground that plane until the fabric is
replaced no matter how much it cost.

Just because the fabric is 25 years old does not mean that it needs
replacement.
It means that it needs a good close inspection, which includes punch
testing.
Is the dope cracked anywhere? Anywhere there is a crack there could be UV
damage.
Check for ringworm, pretty much the same thing as cracking. Get inside it
on a bright day and see where the light comes through the fabric.
Look for loose spots where the glue may have come loose. Squeeze the
training edges of the control surfaces and see if there is any
crunchyness. That will indicate corrosion.
Discoloration of the dope along metal parts will indicate rust.

If it all seems good, buy it with the understanding that it may need
recovering in the next few years and the price should reflect that.

But like all old aircraft, it's not so much age but condition.


Dave



  #4  
Old October 9th 05, 06:45 PM
Ernest Christley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Cy Galley wrote:
How can one take a ONE word answer to the question... "will the punch test
tell how much longer the fabric will last?" and turn it into replace the
fabric is beyond me!


Quite right. I read WAY to much into your postings. I was being to
clever by half.

I began reading to much between the lines with Veedubber's comment that
it just isn't the fabric, but also the supporting structures underneath
that have been hidden for 25yrs.

I explained to Veedubber that I'm a scaredy-cat about what Father Time
and his insidious sidekick Water Vapor will do to a structure over the
years. Personally, I'd replace the fabric, but Veedubber informed me
that there are devices that can ultrasonically test for hidden rust and
defects. (Is it safe to assume that questionable wood can also be picked
up?)

Cy, Jim and Veedubber, please accept my apologies.

--
This is by far the hardest lesson about freedom. It goes against
instinct, and morality, to just sit back and watch people make
mistakes. We want to help them, which means control them and their
decisions, but in doing so we actually hurt them (and ourselves)."
  #5  
Old October 8th 05, 04:59 AM
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

BULL****. DO NOT put words in my mouth. Nowhere did I say that the fabric
should be replaced. NOr did Bob or Cy. We simply said that a punch test
should be taken at face value. If it punches green, fly. If it punches
grey replace it. NOWHERE did we say that the fabric should be replaced.

Jim




"Ernest Christley" wrote in message
om...
Michael Horowitz wrote:
the punch test on fabric... are the results a go/no-go decision, or
can an A&P make a determination as to how long the covering will last
based on the test? - Mike


Mike, I haven't read RAH in a few days, and I'm just now catching up, but
your question has drawn a emphatic response from Jim Weir, R.S. Hoover,
AND Cy Galley that you should replace the fabric.

I've been reading this group for a while now, and think I have learned who
knows what they're talking about and who might blow a little smoke now and
then. I would have to say that this is a unique situation. Dude, if you
value your hide, you better ground that plane until the fabric is replaced
no matter how much it cost.rt them (and ourselves)."



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Post Test Web to Usenet Guest Naval Aviation 0 April 22nd 05 03:43 AM
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons Curtl33 General Aviation 7 January 9th 04 11:35 PM
Air Force conducts live test of MOAB Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 November 21st 03 10:45 PM
FAA Knowledge Test Results Richard Moore Instrument Flight Rules 4 October 12th 03 07:10 AM
FAA Knowledge Test Results Richard Moore Simulators 3 October 12th 03 04:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.