![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hmmm, the wife and me took our planned flying vacation in April...
Turned out to be a nasty weather driving vacation of some 4000 miles... Went to see the Arch (underwhelming)... In getting back on the highway I took a wrong turn and wound up in the worst part of St. Louis just blocks from the arch... Looks just like inner city Flint, and Detroit, and Chicago, and Philly,and Pittsburg, and Cleveland, and other cities I have been... Didn't know where I was for sure and I could have been in any of those cities... (how come a nice country boy like me keeps getting lost in these places... I don't get lost in the woods.) So from that perspective St. Louis is neither better nor worse... I did not feel threatened driving narrow tenement streets in what was clearly gang territory, with grafiti, and litter... I can't speak for St. Louis, but Flint and Detroit have to be a hard row to hoe for the civic officials... The manufacturing base has collapsed and the upper and middle classes have mostly fled to the burbs, like Troy, Oakland, etc... The city population has increasing percentages of deep poverty, prison records, hard drug addiction where stealing is the only way to obtain the drugs, crumbling infrastructure, hoplessness, gang bangers controlling entire neighborhoods, alcoholism, single mother families where each child has a different surname and no father in the home, declining educational levels and standards... The social contract is broken... And that social contract involved the neighbors knowing your business, being willing to help, and being willing to let you know if they disapproved of your life style and your childrens behavior.. At the same time these are large cities that come to life in the morning with choking traffic streaming in from the burbs to the downtown and business centers, the malls, the corporate headquarters established in prior eras, the auto plants... Hundred thousand dollar cars driving past eight thousand dollar houses... But there are not muggings at the stop lights or fire fights in the Middle of Jefferson Avenue... Commerce goes on because even poorer people need food, clothing, medical care, birth records, gasoline, lawn mowers, rental movies, and on, and on... The court house complex is a major center of activity and of economic flow with money changing hands... Used car lots abound... Check cashing stores abound... Rent To Own stores are legion... Convenience stores sell cigarettes by the pack or by the single smoke... Beer and liquor sell well... Cheap clothing and cheap furniture stores multiply... KMART, WALLMART, etc., do well in these areas... Sams Clubs, and similar stores are not seen in the inner city as that population base does not make volume purchases, one smoke and a single beer are more like it... You do not take your life in your hands traveling through these cities... However, go bar hopping, hanging around rough places at night, looking to get high or laid, and they might just find your body in the morning... Seems from my readings in latin from high school (long ago in a world far away) that this has been true from the earliest writings of man, not just since the post industrial hangover in Michigan... The Roman soldiers knew that there were certain bawdy houses best avoided if you wanted to be around in the morning... denny hemlock, michigan (one stop light away from being just a wide spot in the road) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Amen
Ol Shy & Bashful - a wide world traveler and adventurer in the seediest places out of pure boredom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I spent most of my life in St. Louis. Personally, I don't understand why
St.Louis was selected as one of the most dangerous cities. I have seen the good side and the bad side of this town. I considered the Southside of Chicago, and several towns near Pittsburgh are more dangerous than St.Louis. So, I have to say that St. Louis is not as bad as reported by CNN. I support this statement based on what I personally have seen. You'd think they were talking about East St. Louis instead. I came across this interesting page about ESL: http://www.builtstlouis.net/eaststlouis/eaststl00.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You'd think they were talking about East St. Louis instead.
East St Louis is one of the scariest places on the planet. http://www.builtstlouis.net/eaststlouis/eaststl00.html Interesting. Mary and I stood under the Arch, well after hours, one summer night not long ago. Everything was closed and deserted, and we were the ONLY people there. It was lovely, with a moon rising over the city... Very romantic. Then, it started to get creepy, knowing how close East St Louis was to us, and how totally vulnerable we were. There we were, two dumb white people with big targets painted on our backs, and we high-tailed it out of there. A bittersweet memory. I still remember when most cities were safe to walk around in. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its not that bad Jay. The arch can be pretty creepy at night though,
due to the number of trees that line every walking path. After 5pm downtown St. Louis pretty much "shuts down" unless there's a sporting event going on. We're just not a downtown sort of city. The activities all are happening further west in the suburbs or Clayton. There has been a recent push (last 5-7 years or so) to develop pocket sort of communities to attract people to downtown again (Washington Ave Loft district, Laclede's landing, etc) with differing levels of success. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There has been a recent push (last 5-7 years or so) to develop pocket
sort of communities to attract people to downtown again (Washington Ave Loft district, Laclede's landing, etc) with differing levels of success. Yeah, most larger cities are trying this approach, with varying degrees of success. Even Iowa City is developing an area into an "old-fashioned" neighborhood, with the houses close to the street, front porches, and no garages allowed to be facing the street. Very 1940s-ish. The zoning is very strict, and -- so far -- the concept has proven to be fairly unpopular. I think most commentators have missed the REAL reason people have "fled" to the suburbs. It has less to do with crime, and more to do with wanting a little land. Personally, I look at these beautiful, newly developed homes and think "nice house -- where's the back yard"? -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() East St Louis is one of the scariest places on the planet. http://www.builtstlouis.net/eaststlouis/eaststl00.html Interesting. Mary and I stood under the Arch, well after hours, one summer night not long ago. Everything was closed and deserted, and we were the ONLY people there. It was lovely, with a moon rising over the city... Very romantic. Then, it started to get creepy, knowing how close East St Louis was to us, and how totally vulnerable we were. There we were, two dumb white people with big targets painted on our backs, and we high-tailed it out of there. The area on the East St. Louis's rivershore is fine, just a couple of casinio riverboats. Only the area beyond that is nightmare, especially at night time. A bittersweet memory. I still remember when most cities were safe to walk around in. You don't feel safe walking around Arch at night time? I thought that this place was fairly safe, but creepy at night because this place was 'shut down' like bld said. There is an active night life going on at north side of Arch (Laclede's landing, etc) I guess you never went there. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You don't feel safe walking around Arch at night time? I thought that this
place was fairly safe, but creepy at night because this place was 'shut down' like bld said. There is an active night life going on at north side of Arch (Laclede's landing, etc) I guess you never went there. Actually, that's where we high-tailed it *to*... Yeah, all those trees and shrubs around the Arch -- so beautiful in the daytime -- sure make you feel vulnerable at night. Too many places to hide. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, IA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Toks Desalu" wrote in message news:0pbhf.9479$%Z5.4071@trndny07... The area on the East St. Louis's rivershore is fine, just a couple of casinio riverboats. That would be West East St. Louis? Only the area beyond that is nightmare, especially at night time. That would be East East St. Louis? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they mention East St. Louis, then I would agree with that assesment
without a question. You DO NOT want to set your foot in this town. Keep this in mind that East St.Louis IS NOT a part of St. Louis. East St. Louis belong to Illinois, not Missouri. That is a separate city. Don't get confused with that. -- Toks Desalu PP-ASEL Dyin' to Soar "Ben Smith" wrote in message ... I spent most of my life in St. Louis. Personally, I don't understand why St.Louis was selected as one of the most dangerous cities. I have seen the good side and the bad side of this town. I considered the Southside of Chicago, and several towns near Pittsburgh are more dangerous than St.Louis. So, I have to say that St. Louis is not as bad as reported by CNN. I support this statement based on what I personally have seen. You'd think they were talking about East St. Louis instead. I came across this interesting page about ESL: http://www.builtstlouis.net/eaststlouis/eaststl00.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|