![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You motivated me to call AOPA. (I had their number handy and didn't
have Facer's.) The lady I talked to said they all use the same underwriters, so if an agent has accurate information, they should all have the same capability about attaining insurance. She said 1) No one would insure my student in a Twin Comanche until he had at least 500 hours, rating or no rating, and 2) She could put him into a Seneca or Cessna 310 with as little as 200 hours, without a rating. So if what she said is accurate, the local insurance guy that my student is using has provided inaccurate information. My student has been trying to buy a Twin Comanche, and yet he may not be insurable in that aircraft. He's also said that he couldn't get insurance without the rating and that he couldn't get it regardless in something with lots of horsepower like a 310. Thank you! On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:17:03 GMT, Kyler Laird wrote: Scott Draper writes: Can a multi-engine student get insurance for his own ME airplane, based on his instructor's ME time? One insurance company is saying "no way"; they'll only insure him AFTER he get's his ME rating. I'm wondering if this is universally true. I bought our Aztec before I even had my Private. My partner had his MEL though. We were both on the policy as soon as I got my ASEL. I was just required to spend 25(?) hours dual and then 15 hours solo in the plane before I was insured for carrying passengers. Call Andy Facer at Facer Insurance. (It's storming here and I'm offline so I can't look up the info.) --kyler |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It may or may not be a horsepower issue, but a combination of factors
involved with certain models. Each model has characteristics that make up it's accident survivability profile and an accident history each it's own. Whether high stall speeds, high or low Vmc or Vyse speeds, thin fast wings, low stall speeds, fat high lift wings, rudder size, cabin size, cabin structure, engine size, turbochargeing, prop rotation, pressurization, complex fuel systems, or center of gravity issues, every twin is different. When we were shopping for insurance for our Aztec we were told that insurance companies look favorably on Aztecs because they have "enough" horsepower to provide adequate single engine performance, but not "too much" power that single engine control problems overwhelm the pilot. Our agent told us that the Aztec premium would be less than a Apache of equal hull value given our times and ratings. He also went through the list of companies willing to insure "transition" pilots (moving from HP Singles to Twins) and noted which company would insure which models with what pilot experience levels and for what size pile of cash. YMMV, but it sounds like you're on the right track and that the agent at the AOPA insurance agency knows what he's talking about. Good luck, Jim |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
insurance companies look favorably on Aztecs because they have
"enough" horsepower to provide adequate single engine performance, but not "too much" power that single engine control problems overwhelm the pilot. Interesting insight, thank you. I may suggest to my student that he look at an Aztec. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Draper wrote:
: You motivated me to call AOPA. (I had their number handy and didn't : have Facer's.) The lady I talked to said they all use the same : underwriters, so if an agent has accurate information, they should all : have the same capability about attaining insurance. : She said : 1) No one would insure my student in a Twin Comanche until he had at : least 500 hours, rating or no rating, and Two years ago, when I was looking at Twin Comanches I called a few companies including AOPA. The only company that was willing to insure me (0 Multi time) was Avemco. They wanted $8000/year. There were no ridiculous limits on the policy: I needed to get a multi rating and could not carry pax until I had 25 hours solo. I could go solo with the appropriate endorsements. It all depends on how much you are willing to pay. -- Aaron |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
could not carry pax until I had 25 hours solo. I could go solo with
the appropriate endorsements. How much total time did you have? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Draper wrote:
: could not carry pax until I had 25 hours solo. I could go solo with : the appropriate endorsements. : How much total time did you have? I think I had 350 or 400 hours total at that time. I may have misread your initial statement into "he needs 300+ hours IN TYPE before they would insure him" instead of "he needs 300+ TOTAL HOURS before they would insure him". If the second statement is true, perhaps he should consider a single for a couple hundred hours. -- Aaron C. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As an Aviation Insurance Underwriter I can tell you that some aviaion
insurance agencies do not represent ALL of the available underwriting companies. Most do, but not all. I put zero-multi-engine time pilots in twins all the time. The transition pilot is an readily insurable risk if you have the right aircraft. We put transition pilots in Twin Comanches and Cessna 310s all the time. A large part of my book of business is multi-engine transition pilots. "Scott Draper" wrote in message ... You motivated me to call AOPA. (I had their number handy and didn't have Facer's.) The lady I talked to said they all use the same underwriters, so if an agent has accurate information, they should all have the same capability about attaining insurance. She said 1) No one would insure my student in a Twin Comanche until he had at least 500 hours, rating or no rating, and 2) She could put him into a Seneca or Cessna 310 with as little as 200 hours, without a rating. So if what she said is accurate, the local insurance guy that my student is using has provided inaccurate information. My student has been trying to buy a Twin Comanche, and yet he may not be insurable in that aircraft. He's also said that he couldn't get insurance without the rating and that he couldn't get it regardless in something with lots of horsepower like a 310. Thank you! On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 17:17:03 GMT, Kyler Laird wrote: Scott Draper writes: Can a multi-engine student get insurance for his own ME airplane, based on his instructor's ME time? One insurance company is saying "no way"; they'll only insure him AFTER he get's his ME rating. I'm wondering if this is universally true. I bought our Aztec before I even had my Private. My partner had his MEL though. We were both on the policy as soon as I got my ASEL. I was just required to spend 25(?) hours dual and then 15 hours solo in the plane before I was insured for carrying passengers. Call Andy Facer at Facer Insurance. (It's storming here and I'm offline so I can't look up the info.) --kyler |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So what are the more insurable light twin choices for a ME transition
pilot? Rob "Michele Howard" wrote in : ... I put zero-multi-engine time pilots in twins all the time. The transition pilot is an readily insurable risk if you have the right aircraft... |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Renters insurance and TRIA | Scrabo | Piloting | 1 | February 20th 05 04:44 AM |
insurance for Sport Pilots! | Cub Driver | Piloting | 4 | September 11th 04 01:14 AM |
FBO Insurance requirement for tie-downs | Chris | Owning | 25 | May 18th 04 07:24 PM |
Aviation Insurance History, data, records? | cloudclimbr | General Aviation | 0 | February 17th 04 03:36 AM |
How find out one's aviation insurance claims history? Aviation Claims Information Bureau? | cloudclimbr | Owning | 1 | February 15th 04 11:16 PM |