![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Eric Greenwell wrote: It would have be about a 1 amp maximum output panel just to be sure of getting 0.5 amps on average, which would leave ~2 amphours to the battery after a 4 hour flight. About 1+ hours of use would remain at your 1.5 amp drain. That's a rather large solar panel to mount on glider, or a rather expensive one. Using PowerFilm PT15-75 thin film flexible modules rated at 50ma, 15.4 volts, it would take 20 units to get 1 ampere. Cost $800 ($40@). These would use 5 square feet plus of surface area. They are 10.6" x 3.9". There were several of these or similar units on gliders at the SSA convention. The edges were taped to mount them and at that size they seemed to form well to the compound curve of the fuselage. Only two or three on a glider which indicates to me that they were mostly for the wow factor.. Randy |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I have been flying with the set up for three seasons. Since my power supply is adequate for all my instruments but for the radio which is an old 1980 ATR 720 and it appears to work well if adequate power is provided. I will go with Tom's suggestion of packing a larger battery. The routine at a contest would be as follows. We get our tasked. It will be entered. The radio and the L Nav is switched off, the GPS and PDA will be on from this time on. If you are in the middle of the pack it could take 25 minutes till launch. Radio and L Nav is turned on at launch. Waiting for an other 25 minutes to get started, maybe more plus a three hour task. Total over 4 hours. Base on what I can figure the idle radio uses .4 amp, the L Nav, the PDA and the GPS uses .35 amp combined, as per CAI. Borgelt uses ~.15 amp I would say a normally charged 7 amp battery with the surface charge taken off and reading about 12.7 volts to start with, it would not surprise me if I would see 12 volt or slightly less on the meter after 4 hours. As it is now all works well but at the end of the flight I should not forget to switch batteries and I been known to forget it. If the ground guys have a good radio my radio will be ok for the normal operation even if I do not switch batteries certainly air to air was never a problem unless I had the radio turned off. Udo Eric Greenwell wrote: It would have be about a 1 amp maximum output panel just to be sure of getting 0.5 amps on average, which would leave ~2 amphours to the battery after a 4 hour flight. About 1+ hours of use would remain at your 1.5 amp drain. That's a rather large solar panel to mount on glider, or a rather expensive one. Using PowerFilm PT15-75 thin film flexible modules rated at 50ma, 15.4 volts, it would take 20 units to get 1 ampere. Cost $800 ($40@). These would use 5 square feet plus of surface area. They are 10.6" x 3.9". There were several of these or similar units on gliders at the SSA convention. The edges were taped to mount them and at that size they seemed to form well to the compound curve of the fuselage. Only two or three on a glider which indicates to me that they were mostly for the wow factor.. Randy |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Birdbones wrote:
Using PowerFilm PT15-75 thin film flexible modules rated at 50ma, 15.4 volts, it would take 20 units to get 1 ampere. Cost $800 ($40@). These would use 5 square feet plus of surface area. They are 10.6" x 3.9". There were several of these or similar units on gliders at the SSA convention. The "or similar" units were Strobl units, and are not similar at all. It's a different type of cell (crystalline) that provides several times the current for a given area compared to the Powerfilm (amorphous) units. They are also several times more expensive, about 4 times thicker, and are the panel supplied by the German glider manufacturers. The edges were taped to mount them and at that size they seemed to form well to the compound curve of the fuselage. I think they are glued on, and the taping is part of the fairing and sealing, not mounting. On the ASH 26 E (and probably the other Schleicher motorgliders), they are flush mounted on the engine bay doors, an elegant way to do it. Only two or three on a glider which indicates to me that they were mostly for the wow factor.. Not true for the Strobl units, which were capable of 1+ amps on the gliders I saw at the convention. I've looked at the Powerfilm units for my glider as they are less than half the price per amp and easier to mount, but they require so much area for the amps I require, I decided against them. I think they would be a good choice for someone looking for 200-300 milliamps. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA www.motorglider.org - Download "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Birdbones wrote:
Using PowerFilm PT15-75 thin film flexible modules rated at 50ma, 15.4 volts, it would take 20 units to get 1 ampere. Cost $800 ($40@) This site http://store.sundancesolar.com/powul...l?page=viewall offers them for $26, which would make them much more attractive. -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA www.motorglider.org - Download "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric,
I downloaded your manual, excellent. Currently I only fantasize about a self launcher. I then went to the Strobl-solar.de website but my Deutsch ist nicht so gut. Google was unable to translate it or find a site in english. Do you know of a U.S. source on the web for these Strobl panels? Randy |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Strobl- Solar
Beschreibung: Artikel Nr.800328 SFL 7,5 monokristallines, flexibles Solarmodul Leistung: 7,5 Watt, 400m Amp. Abmessung:L x B x H 660 x 108 x 1,3mm Gewicht: 145 gr Einzelpreis: 378,95 EUR that one is a narrow strip for one doors only, like the DG 800 one strip = 375.95 Eur The other unit is similar but different dimension. If you want to know more about the product I can help translating Udo |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although I have never measured it, I recall the average current drain for my
Becker transonder is only a couple hundred ma. The reason is that only pulses are sent out and the average power consumed is pretty low. Colin |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
I can only confirm that the Strobl units are far superior to many other units as I am using them on my DUO. 1to1,5 hrs in the sun in the morning usually recharges the 7amp Batterie completly (which you use to start flying with) you switch to charge the other batterie during flight and you can keep on switching them like this and you usually end up a long day with 1 Batterie fully charged and the second one down to about 12.5V. This is especially handy if you are using the transponder as well. Sofar never switched more than once during a flight. A Strobl Solarpanel on the Trailer to charge a portable Buffer Batterie is the Cherry on the Cake. We fly with Solarpower so lets charge our Batteries with Solarpower. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
COLIN LAMB wrote:
Although I have never measured it, I recall the average current drain for my Becker transonder is only a couple hundred ma. The reason is that only pulses are sent out and the average power consumed is pretty low. Not everyone has (or can afford) a Becker transponder. A Terra will happily consume several times that amount. And, try measuring the drain from the encoder at altitude, particularly if it's one with a heater... Marc |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Solar Powered Round The World Flight Planned For 2009 | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 7 | March 14th 05 07:36 AM |
Solar Powered Round The World Flight Planned For 2009 | Larry Dighera | Soaring | 7 | March 14th 05 07:36 AM |
Why not a hinged panel? | Jay Honeck | Owning | 22 | March 7th 05 11:15 PM |
Trying to find the Boeing 737-300 Photo Real Panel for FS98(antique;-) | Heiko Brandstaedter | Simulators | 0 | October 7th 04 02:42 PM |
C182 Glass Panel | Scott Schluer | Piloting | 15 | February 27th 04 03:52 PM |