200+ 9/11 'Smoking Guns' Found in the Mainstream Media

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:ASjLf.23568$Ug4.8809@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:eThLf.22983$Ug4.6352@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Peter Twydell wrote in news:+1usDfBfrW
:

In message , TRUTH
writes
For those who don't trust "alternate" websites



http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html
Terry Pratchett wrote "The truth will make you fret". Too bloody
right.

Why do you persist in posting this crap? Especially to newsgroups
where your chance of encountering anybody who might even think
about
any of
it
being true is about as likely as the Beatles getting back together?
(Apart from the known nutters, of course)

Try alt.imagullibledickhead.xx instead.

Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the evidence before posting
such childish nonsense. The WTC was taken down by controlled
demolitions. THAT'S where the evidence points. And since there's no
evidence otherwise, you loose.

So take your kooky opinions to alt.imagullibledickhead.xx. You
understand that, moron?
Before you get too excited you should read the cite you provided.
It
contains a few errors the most glaring of which is the statement #
30
9/11 - FAA bans takeoffs at 9:26 am for all civilian, military, or
law enforcement aircraft (FAA, Time)
FAA didn't then, and does not now, have authority over military
flight operations.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to mainstream
media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not trustworthy? How about
applying that type of thinking to the government's version of 9/11!
I said nothing of the kind, did I? I pointed out an error in a cite
YOU provided. The same cite that implies a link between 9/11 and a
television show and a never implemented operation from 1962.

You were busy spewing your filth at someone who said what most of us
are thinking, but are too polite to say.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




What the hell's wrong with you? How about looking at the mainstream media
articles and stop nitpicking? btw, your version of events is filth with
no proof

I call this filth: "Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the
evidence before posting such childish nonsense."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

"Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message
...
Stop replying to this idiot.

Why? Without him some newsgroups would be dead. Besides, don't you think
it's funny that, ultimately, he resorts to the same "your thinking is
faulty" response time and time again? I do.

Paul Nixon

"TRUTH" wrote in message
...
Dan wrote in news:24lLf.23578$Ug4.8465@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:ASjLf.23568$Ug4.8809@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Dan wrote in news:eThLf.22983$Ug4.6352@dukeread12:

TRUTH wrote:
Peter Twydell wrote in news:+1usDfBfrW
:

In message , TRUTH
writes
For those who don't trust "alternate" websites



http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html
Terry Pratchett wrote "The truth will make you fret". Too bloody
right.

Why do you persist in posting this crap? Especially to
newsgroups where your chance of encountering anybody who might
even think
about
any of
it
being true is about as likely as the Beatles getting back
together? (Apart from the known nutters, of course)

Try alt.imagullibledickhead.xx instead.

Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the evidence before
posting such childish nonsense. The WTC was taken down by
controlled demolitions. THAT'S where the evidence points. And
since there's no evidence otherwise, you loose.

So take your kooky opinions to alt.imagullibledickhead.xx. You
understand that, moron?
Before you get too excited you should read the cite you
provided. It
contains a few errors the most glaring of which is the statement
#
30
9/11 - FAA bans takeoffs at 9:26 am for all civilian, military,
or law enforcement aircraft (FAA, Time)
FAA didn't then, and does not now, have authority over military
flight operations.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired



So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to
mainstream media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not
trustworthy? How about applying that type of thinking to the
government's version of 9/11!
I said nothing of the kind, did I? I pointed out an error in a
cite
YOU provided. The same cite that implies a link between 9/11 and a
television show and a never implemented operation from 1962.

You were busy spewing your filth at someone who said what most of
us
are thinking, but are too polite to say.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




What the hell's wrong with you? How about looking at the mainstream
media articles and stop nitpicking? btw, your version of events is
filth with no proof

I call this filth: "Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the
evidence before posting such childish nonsense."

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired




That response from me was directed to the asswipe who insulted me. An eye
for an eye

Why don't you provide some evidence to support your, eh, claims then?

Paul Nixon

In message , TRUTH
writes
Peter Twydell wrote in news:+1usDfBfrW
:

In message , TRUTH
writes
For those who don't trust "alternate" websites



http://killtown.911review.org/911smokingguns.html


Terry Pratchett wrote "The truth will make you fret". Too bloody right.

Why do you persist in posting this crap? Especially to newsgroups where
your chance of encountering anybody who might even think about any of
it
being true is about as likely as the Beatles getting back together?
(Apart from the known nutters, of course)

Try alt.imagullibledickhead.xx instead.



Heah asswipe, I'd advise you to look at the evidence before posting such
childish nonsense. The WTC was taken down by controlled demolitions.
THAT'S where the evidence points. And since there's no evidence
otherwise, you loose.

Nice bit of repartee there, your mother must be proud of you.

What exactly is the childish nonsense in my post?

'You loose'? What the hell does that mean? 'You not tight'? Your
spelling is as poor as your logic and your manners.

So take your kooky opinions to alt.imagullibledickhead.xx. You understand
that, moron?

That's rich, you calling me a moron! Who's the one with the kooky
opinions? Who's posting all the nonsense? At least MY IQ is bigger than
my chest measurement.

I still wonder why you're bothering with the people in this newsgroup.
Or bothering them, for that matter.
--
Peter

Ying tong iddle-i po!

TRUTH wrote:

mrtravel wrote in news:q0kLf.51620$dW3.50062
@newssvr21.news.prodigy.com:


TRUTH wrote:

So what you're saying is that a website that gives links to mainstream
media must be 100% accurate, otherwise it's not trustworthy? How about
applying that type of thinking to the government's version of 9/11!


- Salman Rushdie 'given US air ban week before terrorist attacks'

This isn't the same as Salman Rushdie actually being banned, is it?
He only says he was.

What, exactly, does this have to do with 9/11?
Why would banning him indicate the government caused the plane crashes?

If you can't put all those articles in context then there's nothing I can
do for you. Sorry.

Can you?
Other than Salman Rushdie stating he was banned, do you have any source
confirming he was actually banned?