![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah wrote in
: "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in : I also liked this little tidbit... QUOTE And despite the ban on cell phone use during flights, the researchers discovered that on average one to four cell phone calls are made from every commercial flight in the northeast United States. Some are even made during critical flight times, such as the climb after takeoff or the final approach. /QUOTE The latter quote is most interesting because I've never had or heard of a cell phone that even worked above about 3000'AGL... You may not be able to _use_ the cell phone to make a call, but when it is on, it is still transmitting in an attempt to connect to a cell. It's those transmissions that would be causing the interference. Brian -- http://www.skywise711.com - Lasers, Seismology, Astronomy, Skepticism Seismic FAQ: http://www.skywise711.com/SeismicFAQ/SeismicFAQ.html Quake "predictions": http://www.skywise711.com/quakes/EQDB/index.html Sed quis custodiet ipsos Custodes? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Although I'm not surprised that electronic devices can interfere, I am a little suprised they can interfere when the cockpit door is closed and the devices are some distance (several rows), away. Ah... the aviionics displays may be in the cockpit, and the computes may be in an avionics bay behind or below the cockpit, but there is wiring all over the airplane carrying data do and from sensors and antannae located throughout the aircraft. Remember one case on the ASRS reports stating that simply having a pax trade seats with the person next ot him solved an issue... could likely be that a data line ran right below the first seat, but not the second. In one scenario i think it was tracked down to a specific brand of laptop, with a specific hard disk in it... nothing related to wifi, or any other radio signals for that matter. I am surprised tho at the number of idjuts that continue to use their hellphones after they are told to turn them off, and yes I have seen people use them in flight, and get quite vocal when told by an FA to turn it off. Gotta love all the oblivious chattle out there that have to have everything their way all of the time... the real world isn't Burger King folks...... |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig,
Well, this: And despite the ban on cell phone use during flights, the researchers discovered that on average one to four cell phone calls are made from every commercial flight in the northeast United States. Some are even made during critical flight times, such as the climb after takeoff or the final approach. kind of contradicts this, doesn't it? However, the CMU study concluded otherwise. While the researchers looked primarily at cell phone use, they also discovered that emissions from other portable devices proved "problematic." "We found that the risk posed by these portable devices is higher than previously believed," researcher Bill Strauss said in a release announcing the findings. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-03-01, Gig 601XL Builder wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote:
Some are even made during critical flight times, such as the climb after takeoff or the final approach. I've had personal experience of someone's phone going off. It was just the two of us in a Grumman Cheetah. My friend was doing his first for-real ILS in IMC. It wasn't a particularly low IFR night, bases were probably around 800 ft or so. He had forgotten to switch off his phone. Just as we were intercepting the localizer, his wife calls him. Immediately, all audio is replaced by a loud 'bip b b bip b b bip b b bip brbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbrbbrbr' noise. (If you have a GSM phone and have ever had it near a radio receiver, you'll be familiar with this noise). I was monitoring the approach, and didn't notice any disturbance to the loc or gs indications - merely an extremely loud and distracting sound in the headset. I took the controls while he found the phone and shut it off. -- Dylan Smith, Port St Mary, Isle of Man Flying: http://www.dylansmith.net Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de Frontier Elite Universe: http://www.alioth.net |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve,
"In one telling incident, a flight crew stated that a 30-degree navigation error was immediately corrected after a passenger turned off a DVD player and that the error reoccurred when the curious crew asked the passenger to switch the player on again. Game electronics and laptops were the culprits in other reports in which the crew verified in the same way that a particular PED caused erratic navigation indications." The word for that is "anecdotal evidence". -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Doug,
It seems to be enough of a problem that I think the airlines have it right. Does it? The report says there are cell phones on regularly during take-off and landing. And that has done what to the accident numbers? -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Thomas Borchert" wrote in message ... Gig, Well, this: And despite the ban on cell phone use during flights, the researchers discovered that on average one to four cell phone calls are made from every commercial flight in the northeast United States. Some are even made during critical flight times, such as the climb after takeoff or the final approach. kind of contradicts this, doesn't it? However, the CMU study concluded otherwise. While the researchers looked primarily at cell phone use, they also discovered that emissions from other portable devices proved "problematic." "We found that the risk posed by these portable devices is higher than previously believed," researcher Bill Strauss said in a release announcing the findings. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) I'm neither a supporter or detractor of the study but I don't see how those two statements in any way contradict each other. They are barely related. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in message ... http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06060/662669.stm In addition to the cell phones issue the study says... QUOTE Airlines typically allow the use of portable electronic devices, like game players and DVDs, above 10,000 feet, but not during takeoff or landing. Laptops also can be used, but not for communications purposes, such as sending or receiving e-mail. In the past, the FAA has found nothing to indicate that the use of passive devices like laptops or game-playing electronics poses a threat to the aircraft. However, the CMU study concluded otherwise. While the researchers looked primarily at cell phone use, they also discovered that emissions from other portable devices proved "problematic." "We found that the risk posed by these portable devices is higher than previously believed," researcher Bill Strauss said in a release announcing the findings. /QUOTE I also liked this little tidbit... QUOTE And despite the ban on cell phone use during flights, the researchers discovered that on average one to four cell phone calls are made from every commercial flight in the northeast United States. Some are even made during critical flight times, such as the climb after takeoff or the final approach. /QUOTE I don't know about interference in airliners but I do know they can interfere in GA. I was flying a Cessna 182 with Stec autopilot on altitude hold when my pocket buzzed and the airplane pitched down hard for a couple seconds. My cell phone (which I had forgotten to turn off) rang twice before I hit the disconnect button, the airplane pitched down both times. My cell phone is sitting on my desk by my computer speakers, each time it rings the speakers buzz loudly. There is certainly enough output to affect close-by avionics. Allen |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig,
I'm neither a supporter or detractor of the study but I don't see how those two statements in any way contradict each other. They are barely related. Let me explain: If "on average one to four cell phone calls are made from every commercial flight in the northeast United States" and "We found that the risk posed by these portable devices is higher than previously believed" both are true, then the incidents/accidents should show this in an obvious way - unless even the "higher than previously believed" risk is still really small. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skywise wrote in
: Judah wrote in : "Gig 601XL Builder" wrDOTgiaconaATcox.net wrote in : I also liked this little tidbit... QUOTE And despite the ban on cell phone use during flights, the researchers discovered that on average one to four cell phone calls are made from every commercial flight in the northeast United States. Some are even made during critical flight times, such as the climb after takeoff or the final approach. /QUOTE The latter quote is most interesting because I've never had or heard of a cell phone that even worked above about 3000'AGL... You may not be able to _use_ the cell phone to make a call, but when it is on, it is still transmitting in an attempt to connect to a cell. It's those transmissions that would be causing the interference. Brian That's assuming that they really do interfere. I've forgotten to turn my phone off plenty of times while fying, and I have a Motorola Nextel phone which interferes with everything (it sets speakers off in doctor's offices). Yet it doesn't seem to interfere with the Century 2000 or CNX80 in the planes I fly when left on my hip at a max distance of maybe 3' from the electronics or the antennas... Maybe I'm just a skeptic.... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AOPA supports cell phones in GA aircraft | Cub Driver | Piloting | 33 | April 2nd 05 01:28 PM |
AOPA urges allowing cell phone use in general aviation | Eric Greenwell | Soaring | 7 | March 30th 05 08:44 PM |
more radial fans like fw190? | jt | Military Aviation | 51 | August 28th 04 04:22 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |