How did you guys get all these OT conspiracy $!@$%!! types here?

In article , "Morgans"
wrote:

"Bob Noel" wrote

killfile killfile killfiles

What are you using for detection, or keywords?

among my many criteria are kill if subject contains belfort, newgroups or xref
contains rec.travel.air (or alt.disasters.aviation).

I kill a few subject lines - often I use filters that expire.

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

"Bob Noel" wrote

among my many criteria are kill if subject contains belfort, newgroups

****or xref contains rec.travel.air (or alt.disasters.aviation).****

Explain this, for use on OE, if you can, please?
--
Jim in NC

In article , "Morgans"
wrote:

****or xref contains rec.travel.air (or alt.disasters.aviation).****

Explain this, for use on OE, if you can, please?

I don't use OE.

Can you see the headers with OE?

--
Bob Noel
Looking for a sig the
lawyers will hate

In article et,
"Dallas" wrote:

Why are they here? I guess trying to disrupt them by all of us posting a
blank reply 5 times a day would only encourage them?

Dallas

They came here seeking answers as to whether or not the hijackers,
trained only in GA planes and simulators, could have flown to their
targets. When the resounding answer was "YES", they stayed and tried to
impress us with their kookbabble, nonsequitors and phony "experts."

They were surprised to find a whole suite of professions and experience
in this newsgroup and were chagrined when nobody agreed with their
notions.

("Dallas" wrote)
Why are they here? I guess trying to disrupt them by all of us posting a
blank reply 5 times a day would only encourage them?


I'd been answering some of them - different name. I'd leave out our
newsgroup. That did cut down on a few of them because they'd reply (minus)
RAP. g

I haven't done it now for a while. Maybe I'll float a few more out there
tonight. :-)


Montblack-ops

Montblack wrote:

I'd been answering some of them - different name. I'd leave out our
newsgroup. That did cut down on a few of them because they'd reply (minus)
RAP. g

Clever, but certainly this requires a lot of your free time.

Thank you for your effort, though.

--
Peter

("Peter R." wrote)
I'd been answering some of them - different name. I'd leave out our
newsgroup. That did cut down on a few of them because they'd reply
(minus) RAP. g

Clever, but certainly this requires a lot of your free time.


Not much really. My answers were designed to continue the discussion - not
make a stand. Short, to the point. Sometimes a question, etc.

Switching my profile takes 30 seconds.

The real trick is remembering to switch identities back. :-)


Montblack

Montblack wrote:

Not much really. My answers were designed to continue the discussion - not
make a stand. Short, to the point. Sometimes a question, etc.

Switching my profile takes 30 seconds.

The real trick is remembering to switch identities back. :-)

I am impressed. A troll to the trolls.

--
Peter

"Peter R."
I am impressed. A troll to the trolls.

More like tying a pork chop around his neck and leading the dogs out of
town.

:-)

Dallas

Varmit, you faux troll, you've done it again! Congrats