WANTED: Contract Commercial Pilot -

Mike wrote:

I have no patience for people that don't follow directions *OR* the best
interest of the majority of the audience.

Do you really believe that you have your finger on the pulse of the
interest of the majority of the audience?

Matt is a regular contributor to this group, not a post-and-run spammer.
As a turbo-normalized Bonanza pilot who does not read r.a.m, I enjoyed
reading his ad. In a way, the ad served as a barometer of sorts as to what
type of experience is required to fly in that capacity.

Since I do not have a commercial certificate (yet), mountain flying
experience, nor 3,000 hours, I learned that I don't have shot at
applying.

--
Peter

I owe an apology to the group for posting a response like that. It
should have been more constructive and professional, but I think it
might have been inappropriate to assume it would not be of interest to
everyone. Any two newsgroups may have different views on this topic, and
I think I mistakenly assumed this group would view stuff like this as
inappropriate.

Matt, it was nice to read your job posting because it was personable,
and I think that's what matters. If it were just a one liner, then I
would probably view it differently.

I should have suggested, rather than importuned, that your posting may
benefit by presenting it to a larger audience where someone may be
looking for a job just like this.

Sorry.

--
Mike

Peter R. wrote:
Mike wrote:

I have no patience for people that don't follow directions *OR* the best
interest of the majority of the audience.

Do you really believe that you have your finger on the pulse of the
interest of the majority of the audience?

Matt is a regular contributor to this group, not a post-and-run spammer.
As a turbo-normalized Bonanza pilot who does not read r.a.m, I enjoyed
reading his ad. In a way, the ad served as a barometer of sorts as to what
type of experience is required to fly in that capacity.

Since I do not have a commercial certificate (yet), mountain flying
experience, nor 3,000 hours, I learned that I don't have shot at
applying.


Peter, I reckon that my assumption was false that this group wouldn't be
interested in reading about this. I just sent an apology to the group.

--
Mike

"Mike" wrote in message
...
Peter R. wrote:
Mike wrote:

What ****es me off more is that you were told not to!

If you really let things like this bother you maybe a vacation from
Usenet
is in order.



I have no patience for people that don't follow directions *OR* the best
interest of the majority of the audience. Plain and simple.

You need to hole up in a cave until you're past puberty.

[PLONK]

I was also really interested in his ad from a pure pilot's perspective. It
also allows a little look into the actual flying that Matt does (did/will
do) on a daily basis.

I'm sure most people in this group have daydreamed about flying as part of
their job.

Marco

"Peter R." wrote in message
...
Mike wrote:

I have no patience for people that don't follow directions *OR* the best
interest of the majority of the audience.

Do you really believe that you have your finger on the pulse of the
interest of the majority of the audience?

Matt is a regular contributor to this group, not a post-and-run spammer.
As a turbo-normalized Bonanza pilot who does not read r.a.m, I enjoyed
reading his ad. In a way, the ad served as a barometer of sorts as to
what
type of experience is required to fly in that capacity.

Since I do not have a commercial certificate (yet), mountain flying
experience, nor 3,000 hours, I learned that I don't have shot at
applying.

--
Peter




Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com

Matt Barrow wrote:

You need to hole up in a cave until you're past puberty.

[PLONK]

If you really did plonk him, you most likely missed his apology to you.

--
Peter

"Mike" wrote in message
...
I owe an apology to the group for posting a response like that. It should
have been more constructive and professional, but I think it might have
been inappropriate to assume it would not be of interest to everyone. Any
two newsgroups may have different views on this topic, and I think I
mistakenly assumed this group would view stuff like this as inappropriate.

Matt, it was nice to read your job posting because it was personable, and
I think that's what matters. If it were just a one liner, then I would
probably view it differently.

I should have suggested, rather than importuned, that your posting may
benefit by presenting it to a larger audience where someone may be looking
for a job just like this.

Sorry.

Accepted.

And it appears that those who post here are only a rather small
majority...many of whom are pros and I'd be more than happy to land one of
them rather than someone "annoymous".

As I said, I intended to send it only to RAM, but now it seems it was a good
thing I didn't.


--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO

"Peter R." wrote in message
...
Matt Barrow wrote:

You need to hole up in a cave until you're past puberty.

[PLONK]

If you really did plonk him, you most likely missed his apology to you.

Ho Boy...now I gotta reset the group...


Thanks for the update!!

--
Matt
---------------------
Matthew W. Barrow
Site-Fill Homes, LLC.
Montrose, CO

"Mike" wrote in message
...
Peter R. wrote:
Mike wrote:

What ****es me off more is that you were told not to!

If you really let things like this bother you maybe a vacation from
Usenet
is in order.



I have no patience for people that don't follow directions *OR* the best
interest of the majority of the audience. Plain and simple.

so much for the land of the free!

If you really look back a many of the topics and threads in this group,
many are off topic. At least this one was about an airplane. I didn't
catch the one about the drain pipe, but there is a usenet for home
repairs that I look at from time to time. Strange, they do not talk
about airplanes, though.

Ross

Peter R. wrote:

Mike wrote:


I have no patience for people that don't follow directions *OR* the best
interest of the majority of the audience.


Do you really believe that you have your finger on the pulse of the
interest of the majority of the audience?

Matt is a regular contributor to this group, not a post-and-run spammer.
As a turbo-normalized Bonanza pilot who does not read r.a.m, I enjoyed
reading his ad. In a way, the ad served as a barometer of sorts as to what
type of experience is required to fly in that capacity.

Since I do not have a commercial certificate (yet), mountain flying
experience, nor 3,000 hours, I learned that I don't have shot at
applying.