![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc Ramsey wrote:
5Z wrote: It's up to ALL OF US to keep an eye on flight claims and attempt to contact the person making a questionable claim. Ask them to add a comment to the flight explaining the discrepancy, or withdraw the flight. If they refuse, and it's an obvious bust, then submit a "complaint" to the OLC. The very concept of getting accusatory emails from individuals who likely know nothing of the circumstances of my flights, would certainly kill any interest I might have in participating in the OLC... How about calling in law enforcement to carry out random ramp testing on loggers? Once folks start breaking one or two little rules, who knows where it could lead? We need to stamp out this antisocial widespread glider log cheating immediately! Some good examples - all of those recent long ridge flights in the NE USA are made WAY too close to the ground. I think all those logs should be pulled for close scrutiny for violations! Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Marc Ramsey wrote:
5Z wrote: It's up to ALL OF US to keep an eye on flight claims and attempt to contact the person making a questionable claim. Ask them to add a comment to the flight explaining the discrepancy, or withdraw the flight. If they refuse, and it's an obvious bust, then submit a "complaint" to the OLC. The very concept of getting accusatory emails from individuals who likely know nothing of the circumstances of my flights, would certainly kill any interest I might have in participating in the OLC... I can understand that, but is there a way a person could contact you that would be agreeable to you? Or as an alternative to people contacting a pilot with a potential airspace violation, would you prefer any pilot posting a flight with an airspace intrusion explain why the intrusion was allowed (in the comment section on the claim form)? -- Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA www.motorglider.org - Download "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Marc Ramsey wrote: The very concept of getting accusatory emails from individuals who likely know nothing of the circumstances of my flights, would certainly kill any interest I might have in participating in the OLC... I can understand that, but is there a way a person could contact you that would be agreeable to you? Or as an alternative to people contacting a pilot with a potential airspace violation, would you prefer any pilot posting a flight with an airspace intrusion explain why the intrusion was allowed (in the comment section on the claim form)? I might not have an issue with the OLC implementing some mechanism for automatically detecting and requesting clarification on any apparent airspace violations in a flight. It may or may not be worth the hassle, but it would at least be clear what was going on. If I instead had to justify my every move to arbitrary observers, it definitely isn't worth it. Every year I make flights under (and once inside, with permission) Class B airspace, over and inside of (with permission) Class C airspace, over and inside of (inactive) Restricted airspace, in Class A wave windows, etc. A local pilot may or may not understand what is going on, someone outside of the area almost certainly won't. For some people, it would just be a license to harass other pilots. This is one area where personal responsibility should be the primary enforcement mechanism, just as it is for those who aren't participating in the OLC. Marc P.S. I'm not currently participating in the OLC, as I don't think it is worth the hassle... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When someone passes you on the highway doing 15 over the speed limit,
do you call 911 and sic the coppers on him? If you see your neighbor in a sleazy bar about to get lucky, do you call his wife? The saying "Mind your own business" comes to mind! Kirk 66 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When someone passes me doing 80 in a 65 zone, I do call the cops.
Mike Schumann wrote in message ups.com... When someone passes you on the highway doing 15 over the speed limit, do you call 911 and sic the coppers on him? If you see your neighbor in a sleazy bar about to get lucky, do you call his wife? The saying "Mind your own business" comes to mind! Kirk 66 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When someone passes you on the highway doing 15 over the speed limit,
do you call 911 and sic the coppers on him? 15 KPH we have speed cameras and radar and lidar for that! If you see your neighbour in a sleazy bar about to get lucky, do you call his wife? I don't hang out in sleazy bars do you! As a former PI the wife normally paid to find out they called me. The saying "Mind your own business" comes to mind! Yes just like the USA minding everyone else's business the world police. Next time a jet on descent into Australia's busiest airport sucks a glider through its engine don't forget to dial 000 Kirk 66 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sit back and take a deep breath!
What you are talking about are POTENTIAL airspace violations, not PROVEN airspace violations. I have been routinely cleared thru Class B airspace. We also have restricted airspace close by that is open to the public on a given day (or hour), or is restricted in subsections, or is restricted to a certain altitude. You simply can't tell if there has been an ACTUAL violation unless you know all the particulars about the situation. For that reason alone OLC has no business being in the air cop business. MOOYMMV. Tom Seim Richland, WA |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stefan wrote:
Airspace violations *are* my business when they cause the authorities to enlarge that class C airspace for another 10 miles just for safety because gliders are known not to respect airspace boundaries. Airspace violations *are* my business when they cause ATC not to grant me a clearance because gliders are known not to adhere to clearances. Airspace violations *are* my business when I sit in that airliner which hits the offending glider. And all these things have happened to you? Have you compared the number of violations by the mythical "Piper Cub" which happen every year to the number of violations by gliders? Have you examined the faulty logic in advocating an expansion of airspace that is not respected? You also sincerely advocate the mandatory installation of transponders in ALL air vehicles, whether A380's or balloon-borne lawn chairs, do you not? Jack |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
AOPA Sells-Out California Pilots in Military Airspace Grab? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 12 | April 26th 04 06:12 PM |
FAA: 157 airspace violations since 9/11 | AJ | Piloting | 26 | January 6th 04 12:59 AM |