![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
by "Gary Drescher" Apr 24, 2006 at 05:49 PM
Skylune's way: don't settle for trenchant irony if you can issue a petulant taunt instead. I haven't met "trenchant" yet: made me break out the good old American College Dictionary. Thanks. (I think I can do the trenchant ironry and taunt. Petulant? If you are using that to mean contemptuous, I would have to agree. I do have contempt for Boyer and his irrational, un-American methods, and his contempt for everyone who doesn't fly.) |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com... I haven't met "trenchant" yet: made me break out the good old American College Dictionary. Thanks. You're welcome. By the way, there's a good online dictionary at www.m-w.com; or you can just google "definition of x". --Gary |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gary Drescher" wrote:
"Skylune" wrote in message alkaboutaviation.com... I haven't met "trenchant" yet: made me break out the good old American College Dictionary. Thanks. You're welcome. By the way, there's a good online dictionary at www.m-w.com; or you can just google "definition of x". --Gary Or, if using firefox, type "dict:x" in the address -- Alex -- Replace "nospam" with "mail" to reply by email. Checked infrequently. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... Duh. Of course we oppose this study. If the public finds out that we still use leaded fuel, with 2 grams of lead per gallon, which is 4 times the amount that used to be in car fuel, then we are in big trouble. Especially in CA. Well, look at the bright side. If all the tree-huggers really DO get worked up about all that lead, MAYBE they'll let you burn ethanol-free unleaded mogas again in Kalifornia? I would discourage you from sounding like a professional talk radio zealout ranting against "the treehuggers" or what they might do if they find out. I'm a "treehugger." I once flew a C-152 with a photographer over an illegal clearcut of an old-growth forest along the Oregon coast that was subsidized by unknowing taxpayers but shut down as soon as the government found out (of course, 75% had already been cut thanks to friends in Bill F'ckhead Clinton's Forest Service) The photos provided evidence of a crime against the public trust. When they were on the web, by the way, I was getting hits from federally-leased IP ranges daily. Big brother was watching. Without getting too political, there's a tendency for people to think that environmentalists are out to sink GA even though as a pilot/eco-geek I can stand toe-to-toe with an educated environmentalist and make plenty of good arguments for aviation and its fuel requirements. Near as I can tell, the real enemies of General Aviation are 1) Draconian FAA regulations, which I don't feel I need to explain in this forum 2) Land developers; (longtime enemies of the treehugger) lobbying to close down airports because the land is worth more money or because their new residents won't like the noise. 3) The oil industry; windfall profits off of Katrina, taxpayers are rebuilding the region that supplies 30% to half of our domestic crude oil....$750,000,000 in taxpayers dollars to patch up the levees alone, which represents less than one tenth of Exxon's profits in the last quarter. They want tax breaks. THEY BUILT THE CANALS that introduced salt water to the barrier marshland along the Mississippi Delta that helped the storm surges that wiped out places like Chalmette. By the way, 20% of the population of New Orleans works in the energy industries.) 4) Social ignorance, largely due to media/public infatuation every time a plane gets bent, whether somebody is hurt or not. Feel free to challenge any point. I'd love to test my ideas here. -c |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("gatt" wrote)
Feel free to challenge any point. I'd love to test my ideas here. #1. Legal system. Montblack |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You're not a treehugger. Not even close.
gatt wrote: "Jay Honeck" wrote in message ups.com... Duh. Of course we oppose this study. If the public finds out that we still use leaded fuel, with 2 grams of lead per gallon, which is 4 times the amount that used to be in car fuel, then we are in big trouble. Especially in CA. Well, look at the bright side. If all the tree-huggers really DO get worked up about all that lead, MAYBE they'll let you burn ethanol-free unleaded mogas again in Kalifornia? I would discourage you from sounding like a professional talk radio zealout ranting against "the treehuggers" or what they might do if they find out. I'm a "treehugger." I once flew a C-152 with a photographer over an illegal clearcut of an old-growth forest along the Oregon coast that was subsidized by unknowing taxpayers but shut down as soon as the government found out (of course, 75% had already been cut thanks to friends in Bill F'ckhead Clinton's Forest Service) The photos provided evidence of a crime against the public trust. When they were on the web, by the way, I was getting hits from federally-leased IP ranges daily. Big brother was watching. Without getting too political, there's a tendency for people to think that environmentalists are out to sink GA even though as a pilot/eco-geek I can stand toe-to-toe with an educated environmentalist and make plenty of good arguments for aviation and its fuel requirements. Near as I can tell, the real enemies of General Aviation are 1) Draconian FAA regulations, which I don't feel I need to explain in this forum 2) Land developers; (longtime enemies of the treehugger) lobbying to close down airports because the land is worth more money or because their new residents won't like the noise. 3) The oil industry; windfall profits off of Katrina, taxpayers are rebuilding the region that supplies 30% to half of our domestic crude oil....$750,000,000 in taxpayers dollars to patch up the levees alone, which represents less than one tenth of Exxon's profits in the last quarter. They want tax breaks. THEY BUILT THE CANALS that introduced salt water to the barrier marshland along the Mississippi Delta that helped the storm surges that wiped out places like Chalmette. By the way, 20% of the population of New Orleans works in the energy industries.) 4) Social ignorance, largely due to media/public infatuation every time a plane gets bent, whether somebody is hurt or not. Feel free to challenge any point. I'd love to test my ideas here. -c |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Montblack" wrote in message ... ("gatt" wrote) Feel free to challenge any point. I'd love to test my ideas here. #1. Legal system. What does that mean? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]() No, but I've been there and done that and in the process, talked to many of the various northwestern treehugger species, from the ex-Earth First! types, politicians and the garden-variety "Drivin' daddy's Beamer to the protest on the way to he Phish concert" types too. Lotta useless, clueless college-age parasites but also some -really- interesting minds. I wouldn't say I came out of the experience with a profound new respect for hippies. : I can't speak for the rest of the country, but out here the activist leaders who organize everything are smart enough to know the importance of general aviation. The shrieking retro-hippie ninnies don't, necessarily, but they don't actually accomplish anything anyhow for the most part. The rednecks who fired shotguns over our heads and dumped roofing nails all over the road when the OSU Forestry Department and Time Magazine were coming up to a timber arson auction site sure thought I was a treehugger. I pulled at least two dozen nails from each of my tires. When we reported it to the state police, he said "It must have been those ecoterrorists but there's nothing I can do. The USFS has authority and told us we can't go up there." -c "Newps" wrote in message ... You're not a treehugger. Not even close. I'm a "treehugger." I once flew a C-152 with a photographer over an illegal clearcut of an old-growth forest along the Oregon coast that was subsidized by unknowing taxpayers but shut down as soon as the government found out (of course, 75% had already been cut thanks to friends in Bill F'ckhead Clinton's Forest Service) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "gatt" wrote in message ... The rednecks who fired shotguns over our heads and dumped roofing nails all over the road when the OSU Forestry Department and Time Magazine were coming up to a timber arson auction site sure thought I was a treehugger. Which "rednecks" were those? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Instrument Flight Rules | 139 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
AOPA and ATC Privatization | Chip Jones | Piloting | 133 | November 12th 03 08:26 PM |
Soviet Submarines Losses - WWII | Mike Yared | Military Aviation | 4 | October 30th 03 03:09 AM |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Piloting | 25 | September 11th 03 01:27 PM |