![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jonathan Goodish" wrote in message ... In article , Bob Fry wrote: ed I am not sure how your cellphone fits in here, but you DO know ed that using it in flight is illegal Using a digital PCS phone in flight is not illegal so long as the PIC determines it doesn't interfere with any flight or nav instruments. Using an older AMPS cellphone is illegal. When did the FCC repeal this prohibition? JKG Operations Aircraft Usage Section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR Part 22, provides that cellular telephones installed in, or carried aboard airplanes, balloons, or any other type of aircraft, must not be operated while the aircraft is off the ground. The following notice must be posted on or near each cellular telephone installed in any aircraft: "The use of cellular telephones while this aircraft is airborne is prohibited by FCC rules, and the violation of this rule could result in suspension of service and/or a fine. The use of cellular telephones while this aircraft is on the ground is subject to FAA regulations." However, the Commission has granted AirCell, Inc. (AirCell) and certain participating cellular carriers limited waivers of Section 22.925, to allow the use of AirCell equipment while airborne, subject to certain conditions. The AirCell equipment, which includes a modified cellular mobile telephone and specially designed aircraft antenna, is designed to avoid causing significant interference to terrestrial cellular systems. Pursuant to appeals filed by certain cellular licensees opposing the Commission's grant of such waivers, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected petitioners' claim that the Commission's grant of the waivers unlawfully modified their licenses, but remanded the case to the Commission to further explain certain of the technical grounds for its decision. See AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., v. FCC, 270 F.3d 959 (D.C. Cir. 2001). This remand, as well as a separate request by AirCell to extend the duration of the waivers, are currently pending before the Commission. Section 91.21 of the FAA rules (14. C.F.R. 91.21) prohibits the use of (with some exceptions) portable electronic devices while on board U.S. registered civil aircraft operated by the holder of an air carrier operating certificate, or operating certificate, or any other aircraft operated under instrument flight rules. The FAA has issued an advisory circular offering information and guidance for assistance in compliance with Section 91.21. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 17-Jul-2006, Bob Fry wrote: Using a digital PCS phone in flight is not illegal so long as the PIC determines it doesn't interfere with any flight or nav instruments. Using an older AMPS cellphone is illegal. WRONG!!! Use of ANY ordinary cellphone while in flight is prohibited. The exception as of today is that AirCell phones (which use analog technology) are allowed under a special FCC waiver. (For more technical info on AirCell, see: http://www.wirelessweek.com/article/...esc=Technology) The FCC has recently auctioned some spectrum intended for use in providing air-to-ground links for commercial airliners. These will be used to connect micro base stations within the airplane cabin with terrestrial networks. Once these airborne base stations are deployed, passengers will be able to use compatible cellphones in flight. Because connection will be to the base station within the same airplane cabin, transmit power of both the base station and the cellphone will be extremely low, so that they will not interfere with terrestrial cellular networks. It is not clear whether the operators of this airborne system will make it available to private aircraft. -Elliott Drucker |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks for the reference that proves my point.
JKG In article , "T" wrote: "Jonathan Goodish" wrote in message ... In article , Bob Fry wrote: ed I am not sure how your cellphone fits in here, but you DO know ed that using it in flight is illegal Using a digital PCS phone in flight is not illegal so long as the PIC determines it doesn't interfere with any flight or nav instruments. Using an older AMPS cellphone is illegal. When did the FCC repeal this prohibition? JKG Operations Aircraft Usage Section 22.925 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR Part 22, provides that cellular telephones installed in, or carried aboard airplanes, balloons, or any other type of aircraft, must not be operated while the aircraft is off the ground. The following notice must be posted on or near each cellular telephone installed in any aircraft: "The use of cellular telephones while this aircraft is airborne is prohibited by FCC rules, and the violation of this rule could result in suspension of service and/or a fine. The use of cellular telephones while this aircraft is on the ground is subject to FAA regulations." However, the Commission has granted AirCell, Inc. (AirCell) and certain participating cellular carriers limited waivers of Section 22.925, to allow the use of AirCell equipment while airborne, subject to certain conditions. The AirCell equipment, which includes a modified cellular mobile telephone and specially designed aircraft antenna, is designed to avoid causing significant interference to terrestrial cellular systems. Pursuant to appeals filed by certain cellular licensees opposing the Commission's grant of such waivers, the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit rejected petitioners' claim that the Commission's grant of the waivers unlawfully modified their licenses, but remanded the case to the Commission to further explain certain of the technical grounds for its decision. See AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., v. FCC, 270 F.3d 959 (D.C. Cir. 2001). This remand, as well as a separate request by AirCell to extend the duration of the waivers, are currently pending before the Commission. Section 91.21 of the FAA rules (14. C.F.R. 91.21) prohibits the use of (with some exceptions) portable electronic devices while on board U.S. registered civil aircraft operated by the holder of an air carrier operating certificate, or operating certificate, or any other aircraft operated under instrument flight rules. The FAA has issued an advisory circular offering information and guidance for assistance in compliance with Section 91.21. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"ed" == e drucker writes:
ed On 17-Jul-2006, Bob Fry wrote: Using a digital PCS phone in flight is not illegal so long as the PIC determines it doesn't interfere with any flight or nav instruments. Using an older AMPS cellphone is illegal. ed WRONG!!! I believe you are wrong. To the FCC, cellular telephones and Personal Communication Service (PCS) phones are two different things. Cellular phones are banned from aircraft by the FCC; PCS phones are not explicitly banned nor permitted. I suggest http://tinyurl.com/znp3w as a good explanation and summary. As far as the FAA, their regulations state: § 91.21 Portable electronic devices. (a) Except as provided in paragraph (b) of this section, no person may operate, nor may any operator or pilot in command of an aircraft allow the operation of, any portable electronic device on any of the following U.S.-registered civil aircraft: (1) Aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate; or (2) Any other aircraft while it is operated under IFR. (b) Paragraph (a) of this section does not apply to-- (1) Portable voice recorders; (2) Hearing aids; (3) Heart pacemakers; (4) Electric shavers; or (5) Any other portable electronic device that the operator of the aircraft has determined will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft on which it is to be used. (c) In the case of an aircraft operated by a holder of an air carrier operating certificate or an operating certificate, the determination required by paragraph (b)(5) of this section shall be made by that operator of the aircraft on which the particular device is to be used. In the case of other aircraft, the determination may be made by the pilot in command or other operator of the aircraft. http://tinyurl.com/zz9j5 In other words, if you have a PCS mobile phone, and are sure it will not switch to *cellular* service, and as operator of your aircraft you have determined it will not cause interference with the navigation or communication system of the aircraft on which it is to be used, *and* you can get the damn thing to work--go for it. N.B. A few weeks ago I gave an aquaintance a flight, and she wanted to call her husband. Tried my phone first and it would connect for a couple of seconds and quit. Tried her phone and it worked fine. I'm thinking she may have had a phone and service provider that switched to AMPS, which are said to work better in flight, and which, to be sure, are not legal to use in flight. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter wrote:
wrote FYI club AvMap is essentially a subscription to updates at the interval you choose and is a lot cheaper than buying individual updates if you update more than once a year. It also gives you discounts on accessories and your get 1 freebee when you subscribe/renew. Support in the US if first rate. Yes, it looks like AVMAP set up a special support/distribution network in the USA. American customers would never put up with the sh*t Europeans put up with. I was curious whether for example two Avmap users could share database updates, by duplicating the CF cards. There's a lot more on the card than just the map. But, if one wanted to do it, the update file is just a file you copy to the card once the compressed version has been unlocked and expanded. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FS: AvMap EKP-IV GPS | Jay Masino | Aviation Marketplace | 11 | November 15th 04 12:01 PM |
Lowrance 2000C vs. AvMap -- comments appreciated | john smith | Piloting | 2 | September 13th 04 02:51 PM |
Some views of my AvMap EKP-IV | Jay Masino | Owning | 20 | September 6th 04 05:01 PM |
AvMap IV price range | Kai Glaesner | Piloting | 2 | September 6th 04 02:07 PM |
AvMap gps | Hankal | Piloting | 9 | November 3rd 03 01:31 AM |