![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Use of any frequency within the band ascribed for aviation use for
other than aviation purposes is a violation of federal law. The US Marshals may be knocking on your front door. If you would like to contact your friends on the ground use a fequency set aside for that purpose. The fed has a site showing all feqs and their legal use. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's also the frequency for my facility and we have sued (and won) where
engineering time, aircraft time, and technician time were trashed by some yoyo yakking to wingman charlie about the restaurant they were headed to. 123.4 and 123.45 are assigned to aviation manufacturers strictly for testing aircraft and aircraft components. Jim "Allen" wrote in message .com... That is the assigned freq for my facility so don't be using it around here! We already listen to nonstop crap on it all day from the airliners flying over. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() RST Engineering wrote: That's also the frequency for my facility and we have sued (and won) where engineering time, aircraft time, and technician time were trashed by some yoyo yakking to wingman charlie about the restaurant they were headed to. 123.4 and 123.45 are assigned to aviation manufacturers strictly for testing aircraft and aircraft components. I've taken up the cause to get the FAA to remove the erroneous inclusion of 122.85 as an air-to-air frequency in the AIM. As you pointed out to me several years ago, it is not and hasn't ever been a legal air-to-air freq. except in special locations like the Grand Canyon. I got going on this when a firefighting outfit was using 122.85 (licensed and legal, air-to ground) to conduct forest fire Ops last year. They were pleading on the frequency for everyone to shut up so they could talk to their tankers and lead planes. Most pilots ignored them and some even told the ground station that 122.85 was fair game, per the AIM. I've spent the last 6 months corresponding with the guy in charge of AIM corrections in D.C. At first he gave me a bunch of erroneous reasons why 122.85 is a valid air-to-air freq., but I've been shooting them down one by one with the help of the FCC regs and a guy over at the FCC. It might be a futile cause, since the error has spread into "common knowledge", but after what I heard last year, I thought it would be worth a shot. John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
RST Engineering wrote:
That's also the frequency for my facility and we have sued (and won) where engineering time, aircraft time, and technician time were trashed by some yoyo yakking to wingman charlie about the restaurant they were headed to. 123.4 and 123.45 are assigned to aviation manufacturers strictly for testing aircraft and aircraft components. I'll admit, we use 123.45 and 123.42 as our "button 2" when doing formation work. Never heard anyone else using it around here, though. Where's your facility (so I don't accidentally step on you guys)? |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Other Frequency Usage Designated by FCC Use
Frequency Air-to-air communications & private airports (not open to the public). 122.750 122.850 Air-to-air communications (general aviation helicopters). 123.025 Aviation instruction, Glider, Hot Air Balloon (not to be used for advisory service). 123.300 123.500 "Bob Martin" wrote in message ... | RST Engineering wrote: | That's also the frequency for my facility and we have sued (and won) where | engineering time, aircraft time, and technician time were trashed by some | yoyo yakking to wingman charlie about the restaurant they were headed to. | | 123.4 and 123.45 are assigned to aviation manufacturers strictly for testing | aircraft and aircraft components. | | | I'll admit, we use 123.45 and 123.42 as our "button 2" when doing | formation work. Never heard anyone else using it around here, though. | Where's your facility (so I don't accidentally step on you guys)? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Macklin" wrote in message news:vjexg.84077$ZW3.72622@dukeread04... Other Frequency Usage Designated by FCC Use Frequency Air-to-air communications & private airports (not open to the public). 122.750 122.850 Air-to-air communications (general aviation helicopters). 123.025 Aviation instruction, Glider, Hot Air Balloon (not to be used for advisory service). 123.300 123.500 Great... now they are going to be trashing my glider frequencies.. why'd you have to go and tell them that. BT |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry to start the email firestorm. Now that I know it is not a legal
activity, I will not use it. Besides, occasionally, having no way for your family to conact you isn't always a bad thing. :-) "steve" wrote in message . .. Hi Everyone, Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I purchased a backup handheld radio for cross country flights, etc. and was wondering if it is permitted to use it so I can contact my family while flying over the local area. I would use a frequency not used locally for any other purposes. Your thoughts? -- Thanks, Steve "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there you will always long to return" - Leonardo Da Vinci |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Boy, you just don't get it, do you? I don't give a damn if you are near my
facility or some facility across the country. You use 123.45 and 123.42 for "formation work" and you are subject to $10,000 an OCCURANCE (that's each time you push the button, sir) plus a year in the FEDERAL pokey. Don't believe me? Talk to the pilot of the Coors Silver Bullet airshow aircraft. I don't know what he plea bargained the fine down to, but it was north of five figures according to my sources. He avoided federal time by pleading first offense. I don't give a damn if you don't hear anybody around you using it. Some poor schmuck that has about ten hours of careful data down in the microvolt range gets honked up because you come on the line talking to wingman Joe at hundreds of microvolts is not going to be a happy camper. Remember, range in miles is equal to the (square root of 2*h), where h is the altitude in feet. At 2000 feet AGL, you sterilize about 65 miles in radius, or about 12,500 square miles. You don't HAVE to hear anybody on the frequency to be interference to a legitimate user. Why don't you just use a legal frequency? And don't ask me to pick a legal frequency for you. I'm telling you what the legalities are on these two. Jim "Bob Martin" wrote in message ... I'll admit, we use 123.45 and 123.42 as our "button 2" when doing formation work. Never heard anyone else using it around here, though. Where's your facility (so I don't accidentally step on you guys)? |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sorry, it is published in the AIM, don't we all know that by
heart? "BTIZ" wrote in message news:qvexg.15007$6w.4393@fed1read11... | | "Jim Macklin" wrote in message | news:vjexg.84077$ZW3.72622@dukeread04... | Other Frequency Usage Designated by FCC Use | Frequency | | Air-to-air communications & private airports (not open | to the public). | 122.750 | 122.850 | | Air-to-air communications (general aviation | helicopters). | 123.025 | | Aviation instruction, Glider, Hot Air Balloon (not to | be used for advisory service). | 123.300 | 123.500 | | | | Great... now they are going to be trashing my glider frequencies.. why'd you | have to go and tell them that. BT | | |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:15:35 -0700, "steve"
wrote: Your thoughts? When boaters do this, the on-shore phone is known as "xxxx mobile" or by the name of the boat's dinghy. However, boaters are not as high-profile as pilots. You could, I suppose, address the other person as "yellow Cessna" or some such, on the air-to-air freq. -- all the best, Dan Ford email: usenet AT danford DOT net Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Flying on the Cheap - Instruments | [email protected] | Home Built | 24 | February 27th 06 02:30 PM |
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible | Bob Gardner | Piloting | 18 | February 22nd 06 08:25 PM |
NTSB: USAF included? | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 10 | September 11th 05 10:33 AM |
I Hate Radios | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 9 | June 6th 05 05:39 PM |
Jim Weir or other qualified persons: a tangent on the 2 radio 1 antennathread | Dave S | Home Built | 12 | June 23rd 04 01:03 AM |