A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old July 24th 06, 11:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
darthpup
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 17
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?

Use of any frequency within the band ascribed for aviation use for
other than aviation purposes is a violation of federal law. The US
Marshals may be knocking on your front door.
If you would like to contact your friends on the ground use a fequency
set aside for that purpose.

The fed has a site showing all feqs and their legal use.

  #12  
Old July 24th 06, 11:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,147
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?

That's also the frequency for my facility and we have sued (and won) where
engineering time, aircraft time, and technician time were trashed by some
yoyo yakking to wingman charlie about the restaurant they were headed to.

123.4 and 123.45 are assigned to aviation manufacturers strictly for testing
aircraft and aircraft components.

Jim



"Allen" wrote in message
.com...

That is the assigned freq for my facility so don't be using it around
here! We already listen to nonstop crap on it all day from the airliners
flying over.



  #13  
Old July 25th 06, 12:07 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
John Galban
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 64
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?


RST Engineering wrote:
That's also the frequency for my facility and we have sued (and won) where
engineering time, aircraft time, and technician time were trashed by some
yoyo yakking to wingman charlie about the restaurant they were headed to.

123.4 and 123.45 are assigned to aviation manufacturers strictly for testing
aircraft and aircraft components.


I've taken up the cause to get the FAA to remove the erroneous
inclusion of 122.85 as an air-to-air frequency in the AIM. As you
pointed out to me several years ago, it is not and hasn't ever been a
legal air-to-air freq. except in special locations like the Grand
Canyon.

I got going on this when a firefighting outfit was using 122.85
(licensed and legal, air-to ground) to conduct forest fire Ops last
year. They were pleading on the frequency for everyone to shut up so
they could talk to their tankers and lead planes. Most pilots ignored
them and some even told the ground station that 122.85 was fair game,
per the AIM.

I've spent the last 6 months corresponding with the guy in charge of
AIM corrections in D.C. At first he gave me a bunch of erroneous
reasons why 122.85 is a valid air-to-air freq., but I've been shooting
them down one by one with the help of the FCC regs and a guy over at
the FCC.

It might be a futile cause, since the error has spread into "common
knowledge", but after what I heard last year, I thought it would be
worth a shot.

John Galban=====N4BQ (PA28-180)

  #14  
Old July 25th 06, 01:41 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Bob Martin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 47
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?

RST Engineering wrote:
That's also the frequency for my facility and we have sued (and won) where
engineering time, aircraft time, and technician time were trashed by some
yoyo yakking to wingman charlie about the restaurant they were headed to.

123.4 and 123.45 are assigned to aviation manufacturers strictly for testing
aircraft and aircraft components.


I'll admit, we use 123.45 and 123.42 as our "button 2" when doing
formation work. Never heard anyone else using it around here, though.
Where's your facility (so I don't accidentally step on you guys)?
  #15  
Old July 25th 06, 02:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?

Other Frequency Usage Designated by FCC Use
Frequency

Air-to-air communications & private airports (not open
to the public).
122.750
122.850

Air-to-air communications (general aviation
helicopters).
123.025

Aviation instruction, Glider, Hot Air Balloon (not to
be used for advisory service).
123.300
123.500




"Bob Martin" wrote in message
...
| RST Engineering wrote:
| That's also the frequency for my facility and we have
sued (and won) where
| engineering time, aircraft time, and technician time
were trashed by some
| yoyo yakking to wingman charlie about the restaurant
they were headed to.
|
| 123.4 and 123.45 are assigned to aviation manufacturers
strictly for testing
| aircraft and aircraft components.
|
|
| I'll admit, we use 123.45 and 123.42 as our "button 2"
when doing
| formation work. Never heard anyone else using it around
here, though.
| Where's your facility (so I don't accidentally step on you
guys)?


  #16  
Old July 25th 06, 02:31 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
BTIZ
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 180
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?


"Jim Macklin" wrote in message
news:vjexg.84077$ZW3.72622@dukeread04...
Other Frequency Usage Designated by FCC Use
Frequency

Air-to-air communications & private airports (not open
to the public).
122.750
122.850

Air-to-air communications (general aviation
helicopters).
123.025

Aviation instruction, Glider, Hot Air Balloon (not to
be used for advisory service).
123.300
123.500



Great... now they are going to be trashing my glider frequencies.. why'd you
have to go and tell them that. BT


  #17  
Old July 25th 06, 05:36 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
steve[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 23
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?

Sorry to start the email firestorm. Now that I know it is not a legal
activity, I will not use it.

Besides, occasionally, having no way for your family to conact you isn't
always a bad thing. :-)

"steve" wrote in message
. ..
Hi Everyone,

Sorry if this is a stupid question, but I purchased a backup handheld
radio for cross country flights, etc. and was wondering if it is permitted
to use it so I can contact my family while flying over the local area.

I would use a frequency not used locally for any other purposes.

Your thoughts?

--
Thanks,

Steve

"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the Earth
with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been, and there
you will always long to return"
- Leonardo Da Vinci





  #18  
Old July 25th 06, 06:34 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
RST Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,147
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?

Boy, you just don't get it, do you? I don't give a damn if you are near my
facility or some facility across the country. You use 123.45 and 123.42 for
"formation work" and you are subject to $10,000 an OCCURANCE (that's each
time you push the button, sir) plus a year in the FEDERAL pokey.

Don't believe me? Talk to the pilot of the Coors Silver Bullet airshow
aircraft. I don't know what he plea bargained the fine down to, but it was
north of five figures according to my sources. He avoided federal time by
pleading first offense.

I don't give a damn if you don't hear anybody around you using it. Some
poor schmuck that has about ten hours of careful data down in the microvolt
range gets honked up because you come on the line talking to wingman Joe at
hundreds of microvolts is not going to be a happy camper.

Remember, range in miles is equal to the (square root of 2*h), where h is
the altitude in feet. At 2000 feet AGL, you sterilize about 65 miles in
radius, or about 12,500 square miles. You don't HAVE to hear anybody on the
frequency to be interference to a legitimate user.

Why don't you just use a legal frequency? And don't ask me to pick a legal
frequency for you. I'm telling you what the legalities are on these two.

Jim




"Bob Martin" wrote in message
...




I'll admit, we use 123.45 and 123.42 as our "button 2" when doing
formation work. Never heard anyone else using it around here, though.
Where's your facility (so I don't accidentally step on you guys)?



  #19  
Old July 25th 06, 08:45 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jim Macklin
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,070
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?

Sorry, it is published in the AIM, don't we all know that by
heart?


"BTIZ" wrote in message
news:qvexg.15007$6w.4393@fed1read11...
|
| "Jim Macklin" wrote
in message
| news:vjexg.84077$ZW3.72622@dukeread04...
| Other Frequency Usage Designated by FCC Use
| Frequency
|
| Air-to-air communications & private airports (not
open
| to the public).
| 122.750
| 122.850
|
| Air-to-air communications (general aviation
| helicopters).
| 123.025
|
| Aviation instruction, Glider, Hot Air Balloon (not
to
| be used for advisory service).
| 123.300
| 123.500
|
|
|
| Great... now they are going to be trashing my glider
frequencies.. why'd you
| have to go and tell them that. BT
|
|


  #20  
Old July 25th 06, 11:33 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Cub Driver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Using radio to contact persons on ground while flying?

On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 10:15:35 -0700, "steve"
wrote:

Your thoughts?


When boaters do this, the on-shore phone is known as "xxxx mobile" or
by the name of the boat's dinghy. However, boaters are not as
high-profile as pilots.

You could, I suppose, address the other person as "yellow Cessna" or
some such, on the air-to-air freq.


-- all the best, Dan Ford

email: usenet AT danford DOT net

Warbird's Forum: www.warbirdforum.com
Piper Cub Forum: www.pipercubforum.com
In Search of Lost Time: www.readingproust.com
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flying on the Cheap - Instruments [email protected] Home Built 24 February 27th 06 02:30 PM
Aeronautical Engineer says Official 9/11 Story Not Possible Bob Gardner Piloting 18 February 22nd 06 08:25 PM
NTSB: USAF included? Larry Dighera Piloting 10 September 11th 05 10:33 AM
I Hate Radios Ron Wanttaja Home Built 9 June 6th 05 05:39 PM
Jim Weir or other qualified persons: a tangent on the 2 radio 1 antennathread Dave S Home Built 12 June 23rd 04 01:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.