EFlybook Pirep

In article ,
Grumman-581 wrote:

On 11 Aug 2006 07:19:36 -0700, "Longworth"
wrote:
snip

Why is it that even though you provide a post with obvious aviation
content, you use the x-no-archive option so that no one can see your
comment in the archives at a later date? If it is worth saying once,
then it is worth being archived. It is really irritating when a
person is searching for something in the future and the conversations
are disjointed because some people were inconsiderate, stupid, or just
cowardly and used the x-no-archive option.

How do I turn that on and off?

"Viperdoc" wrote in message m...
:I use a combination of Jepps for most local flying, and FAA charts for lo
: altitudes and flying outside of the local area. It adds up to more than $650
: per year. It also is a lot of revisions to file and books to lug around.
:
: The EFlybook will revolutionize what we use for IFR charts.
:
:

It is legal for IFR?

..Blueskies. wrote:
"Viperdoc" wrote in message m...
:I use a combination of Jepps for most local flying, and FAA charts for lo
: altitudes and flying outside of the local area. It adds up to more than $650
: per year. It also is a lot of revisions to file and books to lug around.
:
: The EFlybook will revolutionize what we use for IFR charts.
:
:

It is legal for IFR?



Since you don't need charts in the first place, why wouldn't it?

"Denny" wrote in message
ups.com...
Howie Keefe's Airchart system is $379 for the entire USA per year...

denny



Me too! That includes approach plates and IFR & VFR charts for continental
US
and updates.

Mark

-----Original Message-----
From: Grumman-581 ]
Posted At: Friday, August 11, 2006 12:23 PM
Posted To: rec.aviation.piloting
Conversation: EFlybook Pirep
Subject: EFlybook Pirep

On 11 Aug 2006 07:19:36 -0700, "Longworth"
wrote:
snip

... If it is worth saying once, then it is worth being archived.
...

I am using MAPIlab's NNTP plugin for Outlook as a newsreader and can
find no user configurable option for archiving. Is this a server-side
option?

The AFD's, lo altitudes, approach plates, etc are all updated online as well
as a CD via mail (your choice, you get both with the subscription). They
would be as "legal" as anything else as far as I can tell.

Problem with the upcoming Sony is that their receptiveness to other people's
software is limited, so it is unlikely that Myairplanes.com will ever be
seen on a Sony machine. Their big advantage is their compression algorithm-
otherwise all of their included info would be many gig.

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 23:11:17 GMT, "Jim Carter"
wrote:
I am using MAPIlab's NNTP plugin for Outlook as a newsreader and can
find no user configurable option for archiving. Is this a server-side
option?

It is text that you put in the message body...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-No-Archive
http://www.livinginternet.com/u/ua_prev.htm

The use of x-no-archive puts you in the same category as the cowardly
anonymous remailer trolls... If something is worth saying the first
time, it should stay around for posterity...

On Fri, 11 Aug 2006 17:23:12 GMT, Grumman-581
wrote:

On 11 Aug 2006 07:19:36 -0700, "Longworth"
wrote:
snip

Why is it that even though you provide a post with obvious aviation
content, you use the x-no-archive option so that no one can see your
comment in the archives at a later date? If it is worth saying once,
then it is worth being archived. It is really irritating when a
person is searching for something in the future and the conversations
are disjointed because some people were inconsiderate, stupid, or just
cowardly and used the x-no-archive option.



Ms. Longworth is none of the above. Her knowledge, intellect, and
consideration is way above board. She is a regular and valuable
contributor to this NG. It is her choice to select the option of her
choice, and it is frankly, none of your business. She owes you
nothing. Take a hike! Thank you for the information, Hai.

On Sat, 12 Aug 2006 01:13:45 GMT, Bill Zaleski
wrote:
Ms. Longworth is none of the above. Her knowledge, intellect, and
consideration is way above board. She is a regular and valuable
contributor to this NG. It is her choice to select the option of her
choice, and it is frankly, none of your business.

Actually, I was giving Longworth the benefit of the doubt in that
maybe the x-no-archive was done by mistake by some setting on their
newsreader. The fact that someone can create a post that is on topic
and possibly useful to future readers is somewhat at odds with someone
who would intentionally use the x-no-archive option...

She owes you nothing. Take a hike!


--
"Welcome to USENET. Has anyone told you to **** off yet?"