![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article . com,
"Bret Ludwig" wrote: Aircraft wouldn't lose the datalink because it would have a backup battery. a backup battery doesn't mean much when the equipment itself dies. -- Bob Noel Looking for a sig the lawyers will hate |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Aug 2006 09:49:04 -0700, "Bret Ludwig"
wrote: Larry Dighera wrote: On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 19:19:22 -0700, Sylvain wrote in : Larry Dighera wrote: Please explain how a data link would be useful in controlling an aircraft that has lost communication capability due to electrical system failure. the same way one would for *any* aircraft that has lost communication capability as described in AIM 6-4-1 for instance? Please explain how aircraft that has lost (data link and all radio) communication capability due to electrical system failure will be able to receive the green 'cleared to land' light gun signal upon arrival if light guns are eliminated as suggested. Aircraft wouldn't lose the datalink because it would have a backup battery. But if it did they could use just one color light and three or four Morse characters which everyone would be required to memorize. Every pilot knows S, O, A, and N (even though AN ranges have went where VOR should have years ago, but I digress) and most people know "V" from Beethoven's FIFTH-da-da-da-dum. I seem to recall being required to demonstrate the ability to identify VOR stations by listening to the Morse coded identifier. This was during my training for the private certificate. I astonished my CFI by listening to the ID just once and then saying, "Ok, that's MZB (or whatever)" without refering to the sectional chart where the morse is given thusly -- --.. -... for MZB. He said, "How'd you do that?" I explained I'd been a ham since I was a kid and could easily decode those things in my head. So.....we're already supposed to be able to do this so how come the tower guys can't talk to NORDO guys this way? Klein, NA7NA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
These are the very colors not separable by victims of the most
common type of colorblindness. That's probably why they were selected. My understanding of color vision is that (aside from the rods) there are three different kinds of cones in the eye - each optimized for a different wavelength. This is what results in "primary colors". So, in a sense, the primary colors are "as far apart as you can get", and people with normal vision should be able to tell them apart the easiest. Thus they make a good choice for discernment, where "closer" colors are less good. Colorblindness (or more accurately "anomolous color sensitivity") has to do with problems with these cone types, or sometimes the lack of certain cone types. (There are individuals who have four cone types, they see different primary colors, perhaps even outside our range of vision.) So, if the problem is with the very cones we've chosen to make the colors "as far apart as possible", then those two colors are indistinguishable. There is, in effect, a lack of redundancy in this color choice. I don't know whether or not this was considered when the choice was made. I've noticed myself that the green (in airport beacons) is often not a well saturated green, and the green (on wingtips) is often blue. Perhaps secondary colors would work better for colorblind people while not being hard to distinguish for normally sighted people. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jose wrote: I've noticed myself that the green (in airport beacons) is often not a well saturated green, and the green (on wingtips) is often blue. Perhaps secondary colors would work better for colorblind people while not being hard to distinguish for normally sighted people. When flying at night (at a distance) I often have to watch the beacon for a bit to discern white from green. After a few cycles I can tell the brighter white from the dimmer green. On a sunny day the red & white lights on a VASI often are hard to tell apart until I'm within 1 mile. I have a red/green deficiency but can tell white from green from red well enough to have passed the signal lamp test to get a SODA. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Can deaf fly under sports pilot rule? | [email protected] | Piloting | 26 | March 18th 06 05:33 PM |
Flying while deaf | bryan chaisone | Piloting | 34 | September 28th 04 02:47 AM |
Flying while deaf | bryan chaisone | Rotorcraft | 32 | September 28th 04 02:47 AM |