![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm speaking of the question by the OP, which seemed to be
asking if all you had was the compass or the TC [needle], which would be primary. The compass gives 0 [zero] bank angle indication and in a steep turn may not rotate at all. Controlling the airplane can be done with the TC plus some pitch instrument. Controlling the airplane with ONLY the compass is much more difficult because it indicates reverse turn direction on all headings except near 180 degrees (northern hemisphere). Very few airplanes have the mag compass located where it can be flown as sole reference, most are mounted on the windshield post. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message oups.com... | | Jim Macklin wrote: | If you're down to just the compass, worry more about keeping | the wings "level" and less about heading. The compass, in | the northern hemisphere will work as the sole instrument | only when flying south [saw between 150-210] heading. It | will be very sensitive and indicate the correct turn | direction. | | I'm not sure I follow. During my CFII training I got a solid 2 hours of | flying partial panel with compass turns. I was able to fly exact | vectors to ILS, etc. If I was off even by 2 degrees when I rolled out | on a heading my CFII would yell at me. I can tell you from experience | you 100% can fly very, very exact headings in any direction using | compass turns if you know how to read the compass and account for the | effects. I'm not saying doing so in IMC would be as easy as it is under | the hood but personally, I would do that in a second before trying to | do the math required of timed turns while under the pressure of partial | panel IMC. Of course most of us have GPSs which are actually a much | better partial panel way to figuring heading (approximated as course). | | -Robert, CFII | |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Greg" wrote in message
ups.com... In primary and supporting method of attitude instrument flying, which do you consider the primary instrument for bank in the partial panel situation (loss of both attitude indicator and heading indicator)? Turn coordinator or magnetic compass? The turn co-ordinator is your primary measure of bank, for a couple of reasons. First, the compass doesn't measure bank angle - it just shows what direction you're pointing in - whereas the TC does show the degree to which you're banked. Second, and most importantly, because of the way it's put together, the compass doesn't turn steadily, and so it'd be wrong to fool yourself into thinking that the faster the compass was moving, the more you're banked. Have a go one day and you'll see. Take someone competent with you to look out of the window, get to a safe place and height, make sure your DI's set correctly, and do a rate-one turn through 720 degrees or more (go around as much as you like, in fact). In the northern hemisphere at least, you'll note that when the DI goes through 090 or 270, the compass stands a fair chance of agreeing with the DI. As you go through north, though, the compass will under-read, and as you go through south, it'll over-read. The only time you can rely on the compass is when going in a straight line - which is why you always check and adjust your DI when flying in a straight line. Hence if you want to do a partial-panel turn in IMC, you fly straight and check the compass, then do a rate-one turn (the turn co-ordinator shows you the bank angle) for the required number of seconds - three degrees per second for a rate-one turn, of course. You then level out, give the compass a few seconds to stop wiggling, and then adjust your heading if you're a little bit out. I seem to recall in the IMC rating test you have to get to within five or ten degrees of the desired heading with one initial turn and one "fine tune" adjustment - which is generally pretty achievable. David C |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Cartwright" wrote in message ... "Greg" wrote in message ups.com... In primary and supporting method of attitude instrument flying, which do you consider the primary instrument for bank in the partial panel situation (loss of both attitude indicator and heading indicator)? Turn coordinator or magnetic compass? The turn co-ordinator is your primary measure of bank, for a couple of reasons. First, the compass doesn't measure bank angle - it just shows what direction you're pointing in - whereas the TC does show the degree to which you're banked. The turn coordinator shows direction and rate of turn but no bank angle. You can do a skidding standard rate turn with the wings level by applying rudder in one direction and opposite aileron to keep the wings level. In a coordinated turn it does somewhat show bank angle but the faster your airspeed the more bank angle is required to achieve standard rate. I agree with using the TC over the compass if it is avalable. Following is a quote out of the Wikipedia, for what it's worth: "Aircraft compass turns are used in an aircraft when other directional instruments, such as the directional gyro or turn coordinator, have failed." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aircraft_compass_turns Allen |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
whereas the TC does show the degree to which
you're banked. The TC does not show bank. It shows rate of turn, and has a temporary indication of bank intended to "lead" the turn indication. If you slip or skid, the TC will shortly indicate "straight" (non turning) flight. Even though you are banked, you are going straight. Nonetheless, it's what I would use as primary, if I only had that and the whiskey compass. Jose -- The monkey turns the crank and thinks he's making the music. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jose" wrote in message
t... whereas the TC does show the degree to which you're banked. The TC does not show bank. It shows rate of turn, and has a temporary indication of bank intended to "lead" the turn indication. If you slip or skid, the TC will shortly indicate "straight" (non turning) flight. Even though you are banked, you are going straight. Nonetheless, it's what I would use as primary, if I only had that and the whiskey compass. Yup. The crucial point is that the inclinometer tells you about slipping or skidding. So if it's centered, then the TC indeed tells you whether you're banked or level. --Gary |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]() David Cartwright wrote: "Greg" wrote in message ups.com... The turn co-ordinator is your primary measure of bank, for a couple of reasons. First, the compass doesn't measure bank angle - it just shows what direction you're pointing in - whereas the TC does show the degree to which you're banked. Second, and most importantly, because of the way it's put together, the compass doesn't turn steadily, and so it'd be wrong to fool yourself into thinking that the faster the compass was moving, the more you're banked. In a full panel your primary bank is, of course, your heading indicator in straight flight. Yet it also does not indicate bank angle. Have a go one day and you'll see. Take someone competent with you to look out of the window, get to a safe place and height, make sure your DI's set correctly, and do a rate-one turn through 720 degrees or more (go around as much as you like, in fact). In the northern hemisphere at least, you'll note that when the DI goes through 090 or 270, the compass stands a fair chance of agreeing with the DI. As you go through north, though, the compass will under-read, and as you go through south, it'll over-read. The only time you can rely on the compass is when going in a straight line - which is why you always check and adjust your DI when flying in a straight line. Actually the compass is very predicatable in a standard rate turn and its effect is well known and commonly taught to students as "compass turns" as described in the FAA publication I posted earlier. Hence if you want to do a partial-panel turn in IMC, you fly straight and check the compass, then do a rate-one turn (the turn co-ordinator shows you the bank angle) for the required number of seconds - three degrees per second for a rate-one turn, of course. You are describing "timed turns". That is a different technique than "compass turns". Both are commonly taught to instrument students in the U.S. and both result in very exact heading changes when understood. Both are very difficult in turb though. ![]() -Robert, CFII |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Jim Macklin wrote: I'm speaking of the question by the OP, which seemed to be asking if all you had was the compass or the TC [needle], which would be primary. In straigtht and level flight under partial panel the compass would have to be primary because the TC cannot tell you if you are still on the correct heading. Corrections would be made with the TC though. Just like full panel when your DG is primary in straight flight. It is very possible to roll out to a heading within 2 degrees in any direction using "compass turns" technique. -Robert, CFII |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Gary Drescher" wrote: "Jose" wrote in message t... Nonetheless, it's what I would use as primary, if I only had that and the whiskey compass. Yup. The crucial point is that the inclinometer tells you about slipping or skidding. So if it's centered, then the TC indeed tells you whether you're banked or level. --Gary Just two weeks ago I had the wonderful experience of a real live vacuum failure in the middle of clouds over a 200' ceiling. TC with inclinometer to keep the wings level and GPS for navigation got me safely down with help from ATC. I'd check the whiskey compass about once a minute to make sure nothing was lying to me. I always practice partial panel approaches without the GPS, but when it happened in real life I was very happy to have it as a workload reducer. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I took the question to be either/or. What ever instrument
you are intending to keep at a constant, whether heading, altitude or airspeed or RC, is your primary, but control often is not done using that instrument. If the choice was you have only one instrument that shows any heading related indication, which would be primary [compass or TC] then the compass must be primary, but the TC would be "primary for control" and would get the scan priority between what ever pitch instruments, the compass might be scanned only 2% of the time with a majority of the time on the TC/altimeter and a/s. I further said that is all you had was the compass, then a south heading would be best because it eliminates the backwards turning error and magnifies the beginning of a turn and in the correct direction... "Robert M. Gary" wrote in message ups.com... | | Jim Macklin wrote: | I'm speaking of the question by the OP, which seemed to be | asking if all you had was the compass or the TC [needle], | which would be primary. | | In straigtht and level flight under partial panel the compass would | have to be primary because the TC cannot tell you if you are still on | the correct heading. Corrections would be made with the TC though. Just | like full panel when your DG is primary in straight flight. It is very | possible to roll out to a heading within 2 degrees in any direction | using "compass turns" technique. | | -Robert, CFII | |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 25 Aug 2006 09:20:56 -0700, "Robert M. Gary"
wrote: David Cartwright wrote: "Greg" wrote in message ups.com... The turn co-ordinator is your primary measure of bank, for a couple of reasons. First, the compass doesn't measure bank angle - it just shows what direction you're pointing in - whereas the TC does show the degree to which you're banked. Second, and most importantly, because of the way it's put together, the compass doesn't turn steadily, and so it'd be wrong to fool yourself into thinking that the faster the compass was moving, the more you're banked. Most of you guys are far better qualified as I only have an IMC rating. This is less demanding and only valid in the UK. Only 15 hours training are required so to keep things simple I was told to use the second VOR dial as a reminder of present heading by setting heading at the top of the dial. When you make a turn you don't need any maths but look where you need to be on the VOR dial and convert it visually to a clock face. If for example you need to turn 120° right that's 20 past on a clock therefore double and time 40 seconds. Timing is simply bank into a rate one turn and visually add 40 seconds to the clock hand (or could use a timer). The only calculation needed is to double the interpreted time. Hopefully I'll only have to use it when renewing the rating every couple of years. As has already been mentioned the easier way is to use the ADF needle. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
Stupid Question | Crash Lander | Piloting | 35 | July 23rd 06 02:39 AM |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | October 14th 05 08:14 PM |
Washington DC airspace closing for good? | tony roberts | Piloting | 153 | August 11th 05 12:56 AM |