![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() what other strategies do you all use? Stay in bed. Ron Lee |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan writes:
My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? In the area around Phoenix these days, anything that isn't covered with lights is likely to be a mountain, as I think that steep mountainsides are the only spots left that aren't covered with buildings and homes. The valley itself is quite flat, but it is filled with traffic around the 12th-busiest airport in the world, and the mountains rise rapidly around it. The terrain is flatter to the southeast (Mesa, et al.) and southwest (towards Gila Bend), but there are still mountains to contend with--flatter terrain is beyond. To the north, the mountains don't let up much after you leave Phoenix. South Mountain and its range to the south has large radio antennas that help to mark the highest elevations. KPHX is above 1135 feet, so 2000 MSL wouldn't give you much margin in the valley and it will place you within terrain in many of the surrounding mountains. I think 6000 MSL would clear most of the mountains surrounding the valley, but I won't swear to it. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
... In the area around Phoenix these days, anything that isn't covered with lights is likely to be a mountain, as I think that steep mountainsides are the only spots left that aren't covered with buildings and homes. The valley itself is quite flat, but it is filled with traffic around the 12th-busiest airport in the world, and the mountains rise rapidly around it. The terrain is flatter to the southeast (Mesa, et al.) and southwest (towards Gila Bend), but there are still mountains to contend with--flatter terrain is beyond. To the north, the mountains don't let up much after you leave Phoenix. South Mountain and its range to the south has large radio antennas that help to mark the highest elevations. KPHX is above 1135 feet, so 2000 MSL wouldn't give you much margin in the valley and it will place you within terrain in many of the surrounding mountains. I think 6000 MSL would clear most of the mountains surrounding the valley, but I won't swear to it. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. So now we're an expert in geography? Oh, and FWIW, Sky Harbor is 14th busiest worldwide and 8th busiest domestically. Ciao... (That's Italian for PLONK) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Beckman writes:
So now we're an expert in geography? It depends on the location. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Short of
filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? Study the sectional, look for obstructions and terrain. If there's a terminal area chart I look at that too. Read the comments in the AF/D and on airnav about the airport in question. Stay high until you are sure of the terrain. Fly a standard pattern (though in some places that can put you pretty close to some obstructions - consider the approach to 26 at DXR). If in doubt, fly an instrument approach (but even those are visual in the end) Most airports are fine around the pattern, the oddball ones are often evident by their lay on the sectional and the comments in the AF/D. I copy relevant comments to my flight log to have them available to me before approach (to remind me). Jose -- There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats. for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan" wrote:
Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? Instrument procedures and airways are designed to keep you from hitting terrain when you can't see it. If you can't see the terrain at night, flying the instrument procedures seems like a perfectly reasonable way to avoid hitting things. You don't have to file IFR to fly an airway at a VFR altitude at or above the MEA. If you've got GPS, flying the MOCA may get you lower than the MEA but still above anything solid. Likewise, there's no reason you can't fly an instrument approach while VFR. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan" wrote:
... or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? That's a good summary of what I do. If I know my route and the terrain issues from daytime flight or examing the sectional, I can plan what altitude is required. e.g. "If I'm flying to Prescott, I know that if I'm at 8500, I won't hit anything." As others have said, if you don't know the area, you can always fly an instrument procedure. Another consideration is basic risk management. My instructor used to tell me, "Night, Terrain, or Weather - any one might be OK, but any two and you're getting risky, all three..." I don't usually venture too far north into the mountainous areas at night unless I know exactly where I'm going, and the weather is not a factor. Or plan the trip for twilight when there's still some ground visibility. Night flight around the valley is very nice - smooth air, good views of the city, and not too hard to be at an altitude where terrain just isn't a factor. Still it requires basic situational awareness - not only for terrain, but also for all the controlled airspace. Welcome to the valley! Mike |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mike Adams" wrote in message news:caLNg.13772$c07.9506@fed1read04... "Dan" wrote: ... or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? That's a good summary of what I do. If I know my route and the terrain issues from daytime flight or examing the sectional, I can plan what altitude is required. e.g. "If I'm flying to Prescott, I know that if I'm at 8500, I won't hit anything." As others have said, if you don't know the area, you can always fly an instrument procedure. Another consideration is basic risk management. My instructor used to tell me, "Night, Terrain, or Weather - any one might be OK, but any two and you're getting risky, all three..." Nice approach to RM. About a week after I'd flown my night dual XC to Prescott, I attended a safety seminar geared specifically toward flying in AZ. One particular presenter said he approached flying in AZ with these three mindsets: 1) In the daytime, some parts of Arizona can be enjoyed as true VFR 2) Even, in the daytime, a few parts of Arizona should be treated as MVFR or even IFR 3) At night, most of Arizona should be approached as HARD IFR (his emphasis...) Ok, so maybe Prescott wasn't such a good idea for a student cross country, at night, when the moon was in a late rising phase...Guess I was too ignorant to be scared. LOL!! Jay Beckman PP-ASEL Chandler, AZ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Full moon helps. Don't do a long shallow let-down, stay at
cruise altitude and let-down over or very near the airport. If you have radar, tilt it up so the ground clutter is not displayed during a shallow descent. If you see the ground, it will be a ridge above your light path. Use the lights of the cities, as long as your view during let-down doesn't get "blacked out" by ridges and mountains, you should clear obstacles. Use oxygen above 5,000, it will improve your night vision, whether your IFR or VFR. -- James H. Macklin ATP,CFI,A&P "Dan" wrote in message ups.com... | My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you | were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no | terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly | paranoid about hitting terrain at night. | | Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to | your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern | altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of | filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local | MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or | tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and | make a plan? | | --Dan | |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Here's what I do
Go to Landings.com Enter your route and receive terrain avoidance altitudes Check it on your charts Plan route accordingly Fly route, double checking with your terrain avoidance GPS - highly recommend the Lowrance 2000 for $700.00 Tony C-GICE In article . com, "Dan" wrote: My early years of flying were spent in the Midwest where as long as you were over 2000 MSL, there were very few obstacles to hit and no terrain. Now that I have moved out West (Phoenix) I am increasingly paranoid about hitting terrain at night. Choosing a cruise altitude is easy (well above anything even close to your route). However, what I worry about is my letdown to pattern altitude at the destination airport as well as departure. Short of filing IFR (which carries with it Oxygen requirements for some local MEAs) what other strategies do you all use? Any "systems" or tricks to share, or is it pretty much just look at the sectional and make a plan? --Dan -- Tony Roberts PP-ASEL VFR OTT Night Cessna 172H C-GICE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
UAV's and TFR's along the Mexico boarder | John Doe | Piloting | 145 | March 31st 06 06:58 PM |
FAA PPL night flight requirement - does it have to be DUAL? | Peter Clark | Piloting | 21 | January 6th 05 12:38 AM |
Garmin 430 Terrain Avoidance | endre | Instrument Flight Rules | 5 | July 22nd 04 03:41 AM |
Did the Germans have the Norden bombsight? | Cub Driver | Military Aviation | 106 | May 12th 04 07:18 AM |
"I Want To FLY!"-(Youth) My store to raise funds for flying lessons | Curtl33 | General Aviation | 7 | January 9th 04 11:35 PM |