A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old September 15th 06, 06:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Ron Lee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 295
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

"Tom Conner" wrote:


"Skylune" wrote in message
alkaboutaviation.com...
Now that I have again provided the amount of annual funding
deriving from GA fuel taxes (including AV GAS and Jet A), compare
that to 2005 capital grants to airports by looking at the ACTUAL
2005 DATA below. (Note that these figures DO NOT include the
$150K annual operating subsidy that many GA airports receive.)

DAMN: the subsidies are enormous, as every informed person knows....


http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraff...rants_2005.pdf


What are the definitions for the acronyms in the "Service Level" column?
The local GA airports that received grants are listed as "R" in this column.


R is probably "reliever" which is the status of my airport.

Ron Lee



  #12  
Old September 15th 06, 06:45 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steve Foley[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 119
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

"Skylune" wrote in message

DAMN: the subsidies are enormous, as every informed person knows....


If this is the basis of your information, then every MIS-informed person
knows....



http://www.faa.gov/airports_airtraff...rants_2005.pdf




  #13  
Old September 15th 06, 07:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Skylune[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Now, I am assuming the majority of pilots can do simple addition.

Conservatively, take the grants that are clearly for GA airports only, and
compare that to the number (about $180mm) in combined AVgas and Jet A gas
tax receipts.

Then, tell me the GA is not subsidized. Tell me the Bureau of
Transportation statistics is wrong about GA being subsidized (in that
case, maybe AMTRAK isn't subsidized either).

Or, try and change the topic to economic benefits (I can argue that too:
those studies are rigged), supposed national benefits (true only for
remote areas of the country), etc.

Better yet, quote the Destroyer, who laughingly claims that the Highway
trust fund is "going broke" (completely false, as fed gas taxes exceed
amount of outlays, even with all the pork in the ground transportation
projects) while the AV trust fund is doing well.

  #14  
Old September 15th 06, 07:01 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE


"Steve Foley" wrote in message
news:ivBOg.7$_k1.3@trndny01...

Why is Westover Airforce Base listed as GA?


Westover Air Reserve Base, aka Westover Metropolitan Airport, hasn't been an
Air Force Base since 1974.


  #15  
Old September 15th 06, 07:02 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE


"Ron Lee" wrote in message
...

R is probably "reliever" which is the status of my airport.


And what does a "reliever" provide relief for?


  #16  
Old September 15th 06, 07:03 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Skylune[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Yes. Be conservative. Add up only the grants to airports listed as GA
(knowing that R and P categories also use GA, sometimes exclusively GA),
then compare to the amount of AV gas taxes.

Guess which number is MUCH larger. (Of course the grants to large
passenger airports like O'Hare is large -- don't include those numbers).

  #17  
Old September 15th 06, 07:04 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE


"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com...

Now, I am assuming the majority of pilots can do simple addition.

Conservatively, take the grants that are clearly for GA airports only, and
compare that to the number (about $180mm) in combined AVgas and Jet A gas
tax receipts.


But it isn't clear what grants are for GA airports only.


  #18  
Old September 15th 06, 07:06 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Steven P. McNicoll[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 660
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE


"Skylune" wrote in message
lkaboutaviation.com...

Yes. Be conservative. Add up only the grants to airports listed as GA


But some of those have air carrier service.



(knowing that R and P categories also use GA, sometimes exclusively GA),
then compare to the amount of AV gas taxes.


What are the R and P categories?


  #19  
Old September 15th 06, 07:08 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Jose[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,632
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

Conservatively, take the grants that are clearly for GA airports only, and
compare that to the number (about $180mm) in combined AVgas and Jet A gas
tax receipts.


There's your fallacy. One should not take "grants that are clearly for
GA airports only" but "grants that are clearly for GA only". There's a
difference.

Or, take "grants that do not benefit the airlines".

Jose
--
There are more ways to skin a cat than there are cats.
for Email, make the obvious change in the address.
  #20  
Old September 15th 06, 07:12 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Skylune[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 138
Default The subsidies to GA are MASSIVE

No amount of actual data or reasoning will ever convince private pilots
that the paltry couple of hundred million dollars generated by AV gas
taxes per year doesn't cover the cost of the grants and FAA services
absorbed by GA.

For a group that likes to consider itself technical and scientific-minded,
this is astonishing. (Well, actually not, based on the other nonsense put
out by some GA groups on safety, cost, convenience, etc.)






 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The MYTT (Massive Yet Tiny) Engine Harbin Home Built 19 June 4th 06 07:06 PM
fuel subsidies for Angle Flight pilots sashley Piloting 17 September 11th 05 09:25 AM
Spark plug question: Massive electrode or fine wire? Peter R. Owning 9 February 4th 05 02:03 AM
General Zinni on Sixty Minutes WalterM140 Military Aviation 428 July 1st 04 11:16 PM
Massive Israeli Flyover, Possible Trouble Nov 21 robert arndt Military Aviation 8 November 20th 03 04:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.