![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-09-26, Emily wrote:
Now why would anyone plonk you? You seem pretty reasonable to me. Well, it's not by accident that the person using the killfile is the "plonker". -- Ben Jackson AD7GD http://www.ben.com/ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
("Emily" wrote)
Now why would anyone plonk you? Tough crowd. Montblack |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Terry" wrote in message
ink.net... To all the "real" pilots reading this newsgroup....... It's very obvious that Mxsmanic is not serious about learning to fly real airplanes. The questions asked by him are very basic questions that could be found by reading and educating himself in the "right way". Instead it appears he is lazy and wants to take the easy way out. He prefers to use us in this newsgroup give him the answers to his mostly stupid questions. I respect alot of you as fellow pilots in this newsgroup and value your viewpoint even tho I have over 2,000 hours and built my 1st airplane 20 years ago. It's aways interesting to hear others opinions and I will be the first to admit there is always something to learn. I enjoy helping others that might have questions about flying or a particular airplane if I can. It's very clear that Mxsmanic has not tried in anyway to educate himself in anyway other than to ask in this newsgroup. So here's the delimma, a lot of you knowledgeable people are feeding the troll! I know without a doubt, there is a sincere desire to be helpful but all that is happening is for every stupid question answered, two more are in the newgroup the next day.... it's never ending. I don't want to "kill file" anybody but Mxsmanic. I do want to read the rest of your postings and I enjoy them and learn from them. Final comment, please stop responding the Mxsmanic postings, comments about him, Flight Sim's etc. Just let him fade away and get this newsgroup back to questions about flying REAL airplanes, REAL questions, from REAL people. Thank You from 63 year old fellow pilot... Terry N6401F As much as I agree that flight sim problems are rarely solved with real world flying solutions, and that he may be asking some of the questions in the wrong group, I have to say that I am also a flight simmer! And yes, I am learning to fly. I only have 1 hour so far, so have just begun my journey, but just because I am not a real pilot yet, doesn't mean that some of my curious questions that arise from the simming world might not be worth listening to from a real world pilot point of view. You need to remember that just because a thread has been posted, it doesn't mean you have to read it. Crash Lander |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crash Lander wrote:
I am not a real pilot yet, doesn't mean that some of my curious questions that arise from the simming world might not be worth listening to from a real world pilot point of view. This particular issue has to do with the manner in which the subject-named individual responds once people take the time to give an educated, detailed answer. Someone like yourself has demonstrated a willingness to learn and an appreciation for the time someone else took to answer your questions. The subject-named individual does not do that, instead choosing to argue without facts and post inflammatory comments of his own. I KF'ed this one weeks ago and created a filter to kill the post following his, so he absolutely no longer exists in my Usenet world, other than these tribute threads here. A simple subject-based filter will take care of that, too. -- Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Crash Lander wrote:
As much as I agree that flight sim problems are rarely solved with real world flying solutions, and that he may be asking some of the questions in the wrong group, I have to say that I am also a flight simmer! And yes, I am learning to fly. I only have 1 hour so far, so have just begun my journey, but just because I am not a real pilot yet, doesn't mean that some of my curious questions that arise from the simming world might not be worth listening to from a real world pilot point of view. You need to remember that just because a thread has been posted, it doesn't mean you have to read it. Crash Lander 1) You *are* a real pilot with just one hour... a student pilot. Every licensed pilot starts that way. 2) Being a flight simmer isn't the issue here... it's only the wrapper around the rotten meat. 3) The sheer volume of postings from Numbnuts makes it difficult to just killfile his threads. Sure, I can easily killfile *him*, but I'm left with the mass of replies. More to the point, the mass of replies sucks the oxygen out of the room for any real questions. 4) While you have every intention of completing your course of study, Numbnuts only wants to lecture us so as to demonstrate his superior knowledge. The fact that he has none doesn't faze him. *He* is not a real pilot; nor does he have any intention of ever learning how to fly. That's why he needs to go away from here and rec.aviation.student, where he also crossposts. Bottom line: it's not that Numbnuts is a simmer; it's that the simmer is Numbnuts and he doesn't want to learn; only to lecture. -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Crash Lander" wrote in message ... As much as I agree that flight sim problems are rarely solved with real world flying solutions, and that he may be asking some of the questions in the wrong group, I have to say that I am also a flight simmer! And yes, I am learning to fly. I only have 1 hour so far, so have just begun my journey, but just because I am not a real pilot yet, doesn't mean that some of my curious questions that arise from the simming world might not be worth listening to from a real world pilot point of view. You need to remember that just because a thread has been posted, it doesn't mean you have to read it. Crash Lander (I'll vouch for "Crash" ... he's good people (in a usenet kinda way...gdr)) The difference here CL, is that Mx: 1) Has preconcieved notions 2) Is unwilling to accept the answers he's given 3) Insists the answers he's given are wrong and already knows exactly why (adjunct to point #1) No one here will hesitate to inform, enlighten and help educate new pilots if the impression is given (and it can be real or imagined...) that the person posing the questions can actually read the info, digest it and be grateful for the help. Hell, no one would even care if you wanted to debate an issue provided you do so with logic and facts based on real world experiences or observations. Just don't come in here telling hundreds of pilots with experience levels ranging from newbie to multi-thousands of hours that you know better than they do because your computer sim doesn't work that way. Best of luck with your training. Post early and often as you go... Jay Beckman PP-ASEL Chandler, AZ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:05cSg.246$V6.53@fed1read06... "Crash Lander" wrote in message ... As much as I agree that flight sim problems are rarely solved with real world flying solutions, and that he may be asking some of the questions in the wrong group, I have to say that I am also a flight simmer! And yes, I am learning to fly. I only have 1 hour so far, so have just begun my journey, but just because I am not a real pilot yet, doesn't mean that some of my curious questions that arise from the simming world might not be worth listening to from a real world pilot point of view. You need to remember that just because a thread has been posted, it doesn't mean you have to read it. Crash Lander (I'll vouch for "Crash" ... he's good people (in a usenet kinda way...gdr)) The difference here CL, is that Mx: 1) Has preconcieved notions 2) Is unwilling to accept the answers he's given 3) Insists the answers he's given are wrong and already knows exactly why (adjunct to point #1) No one here will hesitate to inform, enlighten and help educate new pilots if the impression is given (and it can be real or imagined...) that the person posing the questions can actually read the info, digest it and be grateful for the help. Hell, no one would even care if you wanted to debate an issue provided you do so with logic and facts based on real world experiences or observations. Just don't come in here telling hundreds of pilots with experience levels ranging from newbie to multi-thousands of hours that you know better than they do because your computer sim doesn't work that way. Best of luck with your training. Post early and often as you go... Jay Beckman PP-ASEL Chandler, AZ Judging from the long threads with little new posting from responders, I think this particular gentleman may have already run his race on the pilot forums :-)) So far, he has me definitely needing more dual so that I come to better understand the basics of giving flight instruction , Pete Duniho needing more instrument time so that he understands what flying IFR is actually all about, and at last peek...(I'm just lurking here mind you...can't wait to see what happens next... ) whether Todd Pattist needs some help with his aerodynamics :-)) My personal opinion is that I hope this guy never leaves. Watching this is more fun than a human being should be allowed to have in one lifetime :-)))))))))))))))))) Dudley |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Dudley!
Still waiting for that photo mate! ;-) Crash Lander |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Crash Lander" wrote in message ... Hi Dudley! Still waiting for that photo mate! ;-) Crash Lander Hi Lander; Trust me CL; a picture of me would completely spoil your good work :-) I find I have had to restructure my Usenet time a bit due to various considerations, and I have removed that other newsgroup from my list and no longer post there. Please feel free to post to me here or on the student group at any time, or you can catch me on the major sim forums where I will be continuing my work with the community. I'll keep an eye on your flying progress, and hope to be posting with you on these groups as you progress along. All the best, Dudley Henriques |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 26 Sep 2006 17:38:24 GMT, "Dudley Henriques"
wrote: "Jay Beckman" wrote in message news:05cSg.246$V6.53@fed1read06... "Crash Lander" wrote in message ... As much as I agree that flight sim problems are rarely solved with real world flying solutions, and that he may be asking some of the questions in the wrong group, I have to say that I am also a flight simmer! And yes, I am learning to fly. I only have 1 hour so far, so have just begun my journey, but just because I am not a real pilot yet, doesn't mean that some of my curious questions that arise from the simming world might not be worth listening to from a real world pilot point of view. You need to remember that just because a thread has been posted, it doesn't mean you have to read it. Crash Lander (I'll vouch for "Crash" ... he's good people (in a usenet kinda way...gdr)) The difference here CL, is that Mx: 1) Has preconcieved notions 2) Is unwilling to accept the answers he's given 3) Insists the answers he's given are wrong and already knows exactly why (adjunct to point #1) No one here will hesitate to inform, enlighten and help educate new pilots if the impression is given (and it can be real or imagined...) that the person posing the questions can actually read the info, digest it and be grateful for the help. Hell, no one would even care if you wanted to debate an issue provided you do so with logic and facts based on real world experiences or observations. Just don't come in here telling hundreds of pilots with experience levels ranging from newbie to multi-thousands of hours that you know better than they do because your computer sim doesn't work that way. Best of luck with your training. Post early and often as you go... Jay Beckman PP-ASEL Chandler, AZ Judging from the long threads with little new posting from responders, I think this particular gentleman may have already run his race on the pilot forums :-)) So far, he has me definitely needing more dual so that I come to better understand the basics of giving flight instruction , Pete Duniho needing more instrument time so that he understands what flying IFR is actually all about, and at last peek...(I'm just lurking here mind you...can't wait to see what happens next... ) whether Todd Pattist needs some help with his aerodynamics :-)) My personal opinion is that I hope this guy never leaves. Watching this is more fun than a human being should be allowed to have in one lifetime :-)))))))))))))))))) Dudley Yup! Hi Dudley, What ever his reasoning he's asked some good questions. Questions that make me think about how I do things and what I see out in the real world. So, even if it's difficult to get some things across I really think it's worth while...and as you said there is a certain entertainment value involved in watching the threads progress. Having to explain something that may be contrary to the way of thinking of the explainee and then paraphrase it is one of the best methods of learning:-)) Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member) (N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair) www.rogerhalstead.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why was the Fokker D VII A Good Plane? | Matthew G. Saroff | Military Aviation | 111 | May 4th 04 05:34 PM |
Liberals Ignore The Wright Brothers | Andrew Gideon | Instrument Flight Rules | 51 | December 14th 03 11:23 AM |
Liberals Ignore The Wright Brothers | Andrew Gideon | Piloting | 50 | December 14th 03 11:23 AM |
Liberals Ignore The Wright Brothers | RobbelothE | Military Aviation | 1 | December 11th 03 04:52 PM |