PC IFR simulators

Have they got a better GPS navigator now?

It seems that GPS training is now core along with ILS and VOR.

Actually, you can now plug your real handheld into a USB port and Elite
will send the data to the GPS. You can probably do this with MS FS
too. I bought Elite a year ago and the scenarios are really good
practice, but they (at minimum) double the cost of the sim. Elite
seems to be painfully slow at new features like an integrated, modern
GPS.

I think for the money, MS gives you the most options. If you are
computer savvy, there are tons of add-ons, and modifications available
to you. There are companies that make add-on GPS (RealityXP) like the
Garmin 5 series that's very accurate and fully implemented.

I can't comment on On Top. I had a copy way back and back then it
wasn't good and didn't have the huge following of add-ons that FS did.
... Akiley

And for IFR training, there's no reason to have all the out-the-window
visuals turned on. Set cloud ceilings to 500 ft. AGL and that's
great for practice approaches.

On 30 Oct 2006 03:40:46 GMT, Blanche wrote:

And for IFR training, there's no reason to have all the out-the-window
visuals turned on. Set cloud ceilings to 500 ft. AGL and that's
great for practice approaches.

I typically set them to MDA or DH in On-Top or just a tad above.


Roger Halstead (K8RI & ARRL life member)
(N833R, S# CD-2 Worlds oldest Debonair)
www.rogerhalstead.com

On 11 Oct 2006 00:11:19 -0700, wrote:

I've been teaching IFR with Elite since version 1.0. No fancy visuals
but good fidelity. They seem to have lowered their price recently to
become more cost-competitive. ($99 fore core package.)

I think Elite is a pretty good way to practice procedures, but I've
been disturbed that the aerodynamic modeling was unrealistic.
Specifically, in a real airplane, I fly the ILS by trimming to my
approach speed in the procedure turn and when I intercept the GS I
just start down by reducing power. Elite doesn't work that way. If you
reduce power, instead of descending like a real airplane, the airspeed
just bleeds off until you stall. To descend, you have to force the
nose down, regardless of power setting. Annoying. I've also been
annoyed that they've continually omitted the LOM on the ILS at my home
airport. In an earlier version, you could add things like that
manually. Now you just have to live with flying an ILS without an LOM.
Like I said though, it is good for brushing up on procedures before
going to the airplane.

RK Henry

Nobody has a PC sim with proper feedback on the trim. You have to
deliberately fly the attitude-power combinations yourself - which are
reasonably accurate. To descend down a glideslope for instance you
reduce power ~500 RPM and lower the nose three degrees.

In a real C172 the nose will drop more than 3 degrees when you reduce
power of its own accord if you let it, but the required attitude and
power change is the same. What's different is the stick force.


RK Henry wrote:
On 11 Oct 2006 00:11:19 -0700, wrote:

I've been teaching IFR with Elite since version 1.0. No fancy visuals
but good fidelity. They seem to have lowered their price recently to
become more cost-competitive. ($99 fore core package.)

I think Elite is a pretty good way to practice procedures, but I've
been disturbed that the aerodynamic modeling was unrealistic.
Specifically, in a real airplane, I fly the ILS by trimming to my
approach speed in the procedure turn and when I intercept the GS I
just start down by reducing power. Elite doesn't work that way. If you
reduce power, instead of descending like a real airplane, the airspeed
just bleeds off until you stall. To descend, you have to force the
nose down, regardless of power setting. Annoying. I've also been
annoyed that they've continually omitted the LOM on the ILS at my home
airport. In an earlier version, you could add things like that
manually. Now you just have to live with flying an ILS without an LOM.
Like I said though, it is good for brushing up on procedures before
going to the airplane.

RK Henry

I wholeheartedly recommend ELITE. A while back I foresaw that I would
likely stop flying but I wanted to keep sharp. I bought Elite because it
was the most accurate representation of a C-172 for IFR I've seen. I have
twice passed IPCs, as if they are just formalities, after not having flown
for two years. I would recommend the IFR syllabus if it's still available.

My last employer was a flight school with a Frasca 142, Elite was as
faithful to the real airplane as the Frasca and about $49K cheaper, IIRC.

Elite was easily the best money I ever spent in aviation.

--

Scott

"tscottme" wrote in message
news
I wholeheartedly recommend ELITE. A while back I foresaw that I would
likely stop flying but I wanted to keep sharp. I bought Elite because it
was the most accurate representation of a C-172 for IFR I've seen. I have
twice passed IPCs, as if they are just formalities, after not having flown
for two years. I would recommend the IFR syllabus if it's still available.

My last employer was a flight school with a Frasca 142, Elite was as
faithful to the real airplane as the Frasca and about $49K cheaper, IIRC.

Elite was easily the best money I ever spent in aviation.

--

Scott

Scott,

Which model or level of ELITE were you using?

Is the basic core product adequate for learning IFR procedures and/or
staying sharp or do you think one needs to go further up the ELITE food
chain?

TIA,

Jay Beckman
PP-ASEL (Maybe IA Student later this year...Maybe...)
Chandler, AZ

At home I use MS FS and X-plane...
Elite http://www.flyelite.com products are very good, but a little more
expansive...

Rocco Caruso

AEROMARKET
www.market.aero

The core package is fine. The premium version just has more
airplanes - including a twin.

Ed


Jay Beckman wrote:
"tscottme" wrote in message
news
I wholeheartedly recommend ELITE. A while back I foresaw that I would
likely stop flying but I wanted to keep sharp. I bought Elite because it
was the most accurate representation of a C-172 for IFR I've seen. I have
twice passed IPCs, as if they are just formalities, after not having flown
for two years. I would recommend the IFR syllabus if it's still available.

My last employer was a flight school with a Frasca 142, Elite was as
faithful to the real airplane as the Frasca and about $49K cheaper, IIRC.

Elite was easily the best money I ever spent in aviation.

--

Scott

Scott,

Which model or level of ELITE were you using?

Is the basic core product adequate for learning IFR procedures and/or
staying sharp or do you think one needs to go further up the ELITE food
chain?

TIA,

Jay Beckman
PP-ASEL (Maybe IA Student later this year...Maybe...)
Chandler, AZ

On Oct 11, 4:53 am, "Jay Beckman" wrote:
Is the basic core product adequate for learning IFR procedures and/or
staying sharp or do you think one needs to go further up the ELITE food
chain?
Jay,
The core product is all you need to learn IFR procedures. I found
the $25 book IFR training syllabus a great addition. I also purchased
two packages of ATC scenarios but did not have the time to use them
much. I'd think that they are quite useful for IFR students who don't
have a lot of exposure to real ATC.
You can download the Elite core program to try it out. I think
the program free program only run for few minutes but with full
functions.

Hai Longworth