![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Natalie writes: No they had both, but they had a stricken aircraft after the depressurization and they had a lot of things to worry about. Doing the PAR approach lessens the pilot workload. Did things like autopilot ILS approach and autoland exist back then? Autopilot did, but it's much cruder than it was today. With an aircraft that's aerodymanically challenged however, I'm not sure I'd have trusted the autopilot. Let me concentrate on moving the controls, off load navigation to ATC. That's what a PAR is good for. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
In the movie _Airport_ (1971), the airport manager mentions that Joe Patroni, the miraculous mechanic who gets a stuck 707 off the runway, is "licensed to taxi." Is there really such a thing as a license to taxi?? No, However the airline I used to work for we had to have Run/taxi authorization for each type of aircraft. I eventually became an instructor. Michelle P |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|