![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Often the ailerons are connect to the rudder with a bungee.
The rudder is connected to the nose wheel steering. Ergo. "Ron Wanttaja" wrote in message ... | On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 07:03:12 +0200, Mxsmanic wrote: | | Why does it seem that the control yokes of small aircraft are always | turned completely to one side or the other in photographs? Is there | some sort of convention about doing this? A safety reason? Why is it | so common? | | I've never seen this. Can you post a link to some examples? | | Ron Wanttaja |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Why does it seem that the control yokes of small aircraft are always turned completely to one side or the other in photographs? Is there some sort of convention about doing this? A safety reason? Why is it so common? Without any airflow over the ailerons, it's kind of hard to hold them in the center. As soon as the control flops over to one side or the other, it tends to stay there. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ron Natalie writes:
Without any airflow over the ailerons, it's kind of hard to hold them in the center. As soon as the control flops over to one side or the other, it tends to stay there. Aren't they balanced such that they have no tendency to turn either way? I should think the forces on them in a parked aircraft would be symmetrical. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Ron Natalie writes: Without any airflow over the ailerons, it's kind of hard to hold them in the center. As soon as the control flops over to one side or the other, it tends to stay there. Aren't they balanced such that they have no tendency to turn either way? I should think the forces on them in a parked aircraft would be symmetrical. They are balanced aerodynamically so they go neutral. As I said, with no wind blowing on them in a lot of planes they'll sit on the stops once they are knocked to one side or another. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Recently, Mxsmanic posted:
Ron Natalie writes: Without any airflow over the ailerons, it's kind of hard to hold them in the center. As soon as the control flops over to one side or the other, it tends to stay there. Aren't they balanced such that they have no tendency to turn either way? I should think the forces on them in a parked aircraft would be symmetrical. The forces on a parked airplane would only be symmetrical if the plane was always headed into the wind. Obviously, this will rarely be the case except for those parking spaces that are built on a turntable with a large rudder on the back. Neil |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-10-16, Neil Gould wrote:
The forces on a parked airplane would only be symmetrical if the plane was always headed into the wind. Obviously, this will rarely be the case except for those parking spaces that are built on a turntable with a large rudder on the back. On a point of pedantry, the turntable parking space would not need a rudder. The plane tied down to this turntable tiedown would cause it to point into the wind, since the turntable/aircraft combination would behave like a large weather vane. -- Yes, the Reply-To email address is valid. Oolite-Linux: an Elite tribute: http://oolite-linux.berlios.de |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/18/06 05:21, Dylan Smith wrote:
On 2006-10-16, Neil Gould wrote: The forces on a parked airplane would only be symmetrical if the plane was always headed into the wind. Obviously, this will rarely be the case except for those parking spaces that are built on a turntable with a large rudder on the back. On a point of pedantry, the turntable parking space would not need a rudder. The plane tied down to this turntable tiedown would cause it to point into the wind, since the turntable/aircraft combination would behave like a large weather vane. Yea ... it's a good thing you caught that. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
There are usually slight differences in weight between the control surfaces,
due to the manufacturing process. For example, it is not uncommon for one aileron to be a pound or two heavier than the other. Gravity, plus the force of winds, will inevitably cause one to droop. Likewise, rudders are not always hinged in a straight line, and the hinge lines are off center, so the rudder will tend to tilt toward the heavier side. This is simply a factor in owning planes that are frequently over 20+ years old. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
rivet squeezer yokes | Jim Burns | Home Built | 13 | May 4th 06 01:52 PM |
1966 Cessna 172 Control Yokes --- What Alloy? | jls | Home Built | 0 | November 4th 04 05:02 PM |
Helicopter exercise turned scary: report | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | July 5th 04 01:43 AM |
Anyone wrapped their yokes in leather? | Jay Honeck | Owning | 13 | March 3rd 04 02:59 PM |
Vintage Cessna Yokes | Al Gilson | Owning | 8 | September 12th 03 03:27 PM |