![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave S wrote: Andrew Sarangan wrote: Carrying an expired book is not a bad idea either. I thought expired charts could bust you on a ramp check... yes? no? No. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Part 91, no, Part 121-135, yes.
"Dave S" wrote in message link.net... | Andrew Sarangan wrote: | Carrying an expired book is not a bad idea either. | | | I thought expired charts could bust you on a ramp check... yes? no? |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
| I thought expired charts could bust you on a ramp check...
yes? no? Part 91, no, Part 121-135, yes. So for part 121-135, expired charts are contraband? They cannot be carried even as cargo? Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jose wrote:
| I thought expired charts could bust you on a ramp check... yes? no? Part 91, no, Part 121-135, yes. So for part 121-135, expired charts are contraband? They cannot be carried even as cargo? Jose You can carry all the expired charts you want on a Part 135 or 121 flight. But, that in no way negates the requirement to have current charts for the operation at hand. In the case of scheduled operations that would be all the charts required to be in the manual. And, the FAA has a copy of that manual in their office. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
mvgossman wrote:
This concept makes me uneasy, but perhaps it would be reasonable to have the regular FAA plates, allowing them to expire but retain them for, say, a year, bring them along, and print out absolutely current plates for the destination and likely alternates. This way, you could have "old but a heckuva lot better than nothing" plates for very unlikely scenarios in the bag. This would help save much money via not getting 99% duplicate plates every 56 days yet provide satisfactory safety. This is exactly what I've been doing for years. Works fine. One time I did wind up landing IFR at an airport for which I had no current plates (I thought). Of course it was a diversion (huge headwinds). I simply asked the controller to verify the revision number of the plate for the approach I was assigned. Turned out I had a current chart after all (they don't change that much). I used to use AirCharts but found that it didn't take me any longer to do what you are contemplating, it cost less, and it was actually more convenient (I would staple the plates together in a trip book, and would have all the charts I was likely to need for the whole trip in one custom book). Michael |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Printing copies of the anticipated approach plates makes a lot of sense -
usually larger, easier to read, fit better on the clipboard, etc etc. However, carrying old plates for the unanticipated diversion does NOT meet the requirements of the FAR's and would, I suspect, be cause for the FAA to bust you and/or the insurance company to disallow a claim in case of an incident/accident. "mvgossman" wrote in message oups.com... Anyone in the habit of going online for instrument approach plates (terminal procedures), printing out only the plates you need for a trip along with possible alternates and taking them in the plane? This concept makes me uneasy, but perhaps it would be reasonable to have the regular FAA plates, allowing them to expire but retain them for, say, a year, bring them along, and print out absolutely current plates for the destination and likely alternates. This way, you could have "old but a heckuva lot better than nothing" plates for very unlikely scenarios in the bag. This would help save much money via not getting 99% duplicate plates every 56 days yet provide satisfactory safety. In case anyone does not know, very nice high quality plates are available free at: http://www.aeroplanner.com/flightpla...oachplates.cfm This has the additional advantage of being able to print out larger copies for those with imperfect reading vision and on higher quality white paper. Mitch |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Sam Spade wrote: Jose wrote: | I thought expired charts could bust you on a ramp check... yes? no? Part 91, no, Part 121-135, yes. So for part 121-135, expired charts are contraband? They cannot be carried even as cargo? Jose You can carry all the expired charts you want on a Part 135 or 121 flight. But, that in no way negates the requirement to have current charts for the operation at hand. In the case of scheduled operations that would be all the charts required to be in the manual. And, the FAA has a copy of that manual in their office. And if you happen to use an expired chart during an emergency or unexpected diversion, even under part 121, I doubt the FAA would ding you for that, as long as you flew the approach correctly and did not cause an incident. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andrew Sarangan wrote:
And if you happen to use an expired chart during an emergency or unexpected diversion, even under part 121, I doubt the FAA would ding you for that, as long as you flew the approach correctly and did not cause an incident. That would be a problem for Part 121. Diversions are supposed to be made to authorized airports. Even alternate-only airports have to be listed in the op specs and have performance data in the flight manual. An emergency is a different matter, but for most carriers a listed airport is usually close enough to be the best plan for an emergency. No approach charts for an emergency would be far more likely than expired approach charts. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/30/06 09:02, pgbnh wrote:
Printing copies of the anticipated approach plates makes a lot of sense - usually larger, easier to read, fit better on the clipboard, etc etc. Okay... However, carrying old plates for the unanticipated diversion does NOT meet the requirements of the FAR's and would, I suspect, be cause for the FAA to bust you and/or the insurance company to disallow a claim in case of an incident/accident. Are you saying that the FAA requires that a part 91 pilot carry current approach plates for airports to which he didn't anticipate he might be diverted? Which FAR is that? "mvgossman" wrote in message oups.com... Anyone in the habit of going online for instrument approach plates (terminal procedures), printing out only the plates you need for a trip along with possible alternates and taking them in the plane? This concept makes me uneasy, but perhaps it would be reasonable to have the regular FAA plates, allowing them to expire but retain them for, say, a year, bring them along, and print out absolutely current plates for the destination and likely alternates. This way, you could have "old but a heckuva lot better than nothing" plates for very unlikely scenarios in the bag. This would help save much money via not getting 99% duplicate plates every 56 days yet provide satisfactory safety. In case anyone does not know, very nice high quality plates are available free at: http://www.aeroplanner.com/flightpla...oachplates.cfm This has the additional advantage of being able to print out larger copies for those with imperfect reading vision and on higher quality white paper. Mitch -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I would vote for 91.13, 91.175, and common sense. You would probably not
want to fly on a commercial flight where the guys up front are using approach plates that are known to be expired. Why expect that YOUR passengers would want to do otherwise? "Mark Hansen" wrote in message ... On 10/30/06 09:02, pgbnh wrote: Printing copies of the anticipated approach plates makes a lot of sense - usually larger, easier to read, fit better on the clipboard, etc etc. Okay... However, carrying old plates for the unanticipated diversion does NOT meet the requirements of the FAR's and would, I suspect, be cause for the FAA to bust you and/or the insurance company to disallow a claim in case of an incident/accident. Are you saying that the FAA requires that a part 91 pilot carry current approach plates for airports to which he didn't anticipate he might be diverted? Which FAR is that? "mvgossman" wrote in message oups.com... Anyone in the habit of going online for instrument approach plates (terminal procedures), printing out only the plates you need for a trip along with possible alternates and taking them in the plane? This concept makes me uneasy, but perhaps it would be reasonable to have the regular FAA plates, allowing them to expire but retain them for, say, a year, bring them along, and print out absolutely current plates for the destination and likely alternates. This way, you could have "old but a heckuva lot better than nothing" plates for very unlikely scenarios in the bag. This would help save much money via not getting 99% duplicate plates every 56 days yet provide satisfactory safety. In case anyone does not know, very nice high quality plates are available free at: http://www.aeroplanner.com/flightpla...oachplates.cfm This has the additional advantage of being able to print out larger copies for those with imperfect reading vision and on higher quality white paper. Mitch -- Mark Hansen, PP-ASEL, Instrument Airplane Cal Aggie Flying Farmers Sacramento, CA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nearly had my life terminated today | Michelle P | Piloting | 11 | September 3rd 05 02:37 AM |
online Canadian approach plates | Robert M. Gary | Piloting | 4 | June 29th 05 05:32 AM |
Stars and Stripes Offers Free Electronic Newspaper, By Sgt. 1st Class Doug Sample, USA | Otis Willie | Naval Aviation | 0 | April 30th 04 09:45 PM |
NACO approach plates | J Haggerty | Instrument Flight Rules | 8 | April 19th 04 04:04 AM |
Canadian instrument approach plates | Paul Cook | Simulators | 0 | July 11th 03 03:43 AM |