![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Danny Dot" wrote in message
... wrote in message oups.com... If the engine has just done something nasty like throw a rod, the best thing financially is to have an off field landing and total the plane. If you land on a runway without damage, the insurance company pays nothing. Danny Dot You are advocating insurance fraud? I guess we now know why you use a psuedo-name. You might want to look into the phrase "prudent uninsured". You might even find it in your policy. -- Geoff The Sea Hawk at Wow Way d0t Com remove spaces and make the obvious substitutions to reply by mail When immigration is outlawed, only outlaws will immigrate. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kinetic energy and thus landing distance, is proportional to the square
of the speed. (Students need to be told this when learning to land.) EridanMan wrote: I read a statistic somewhere that if you touch-down at 50 mph, assuming a constant 9G deceleration (Easily Survivable), you only need 10 feet to come to a full stop. Increase to 70mph, and you need 40 something feet. Fly her all the way into the ground, make a shallow, full stall landing, and you'll probably survive... The real danger comes when people place too much value on not harming the aircraft. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Stubby" wrote in message . .. Kinetic energy and thus landing distance, is proportional to the square of the speed. (Students need to be told this when learning to land.) You want to show us that in an equation? -------------------------------------------- DW |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW, I found the actual numbers here, they were actually in the FAA
"airplane fliers handbook" For a Constant, 9G deceleration (as I mentioned, easily survivable)- at 50MPH, 9.4 feet at 75MPH, 18.8 feet at 100MPH, 37.6 feet What to take away from this, is you will probably survive a full-stall landing on just about any surface in your typical light single GA aircraft... Hell, even in thick bushes or small trees... The key is to strike A- as slow and B- as shallow as possible. The risk comes almost invariably when a pilot passes up a "suitable" landing zone (even the aformentioned tree canopy) for a "better" one that is marginally outside of his energy-budget's reach... A full stall 30 feet off the ground while trying to extend a glide will almost always be fatal... the same full stall just 30 feet lower, even in on a less than ideal surface, will almost always be survivable... Something to remember. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:
You want to show us that in an equation? e=s^2 -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
EridanMan writes:
I read a statistic somewhere that if you touch-down at 50 mph, assuming a constant 9G deceleration (Easily Survivable), you only need 10 feet to come to a full stop. About 9 feet, 4 inches. Increase to 70mph, and you need 40 something feet. Nope. More like 18 feet, 4 inches. The distance varies as the square of the touchdown velocity. And human beings can survive up to at least 46 Gs if they are properly supported and braced for impact, with some temporary sequelae. Nine gravities of acceleration is trivial to survive, but some people will black out if the acceleration is sustained (almost invariably with no aftereffects). Aerobatic aircraft can generally withstand more than 9 Gs, and top aerobatic flyers can fly at such accelerations as well. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks MX, you and I found the same numbers at the same time
![]() The distance varies as the square of the touchdown velocity. And human beings can survive up to at least 46 Gs if they are properly supported and braced for impact, with some temporary sequelae. Nine gravities of acceleration is trivial to survive, but some people will black out if the acceleration is sustained (almost invariably with no aftereffects). Aerobatic aircraft can generally withstand more than 9 Gs, and top aerobatic flyers can fly at such accelerations as well. Bingo. I think a "9 G Average" deceleration is a pretty good bet in general- you can actually survive substantially higher than that, but factor in the chance of it being a 'smooth' deceleration as remote (there will be points you stop more than others), and its a decent rule of thumb. just whatever you do, do not strike with vertical speed- The Ground will stop you _MUCH_ faster vertically than even the thickest brush, mud and obsticles will horizontally, with the exception of tree trunks and brick walls (so yeah, don't land into a brick wall either ![]() DO NOT RISK STALL BY ATTEMPTING TO STRETCH A GLIDE, NO MATTER HOW PERFECT YOUR TARGET TOUCHDOWN POINT IS! I think that's really the core of my argument ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Kyle Boatright wrote: A Lancair was involved in a fatal accident near Dalton, GA yesterday. It crashed in the median of a divided 4 lane highway. The airplane had engine problems and had time to radio distress calls. Depending on the news source, it appears that there might have been as much as 10 to 20 minutes between the first distress call and the crash. One story indicated that the aircraft crashed almost 10 minutes after emergency crews had been notified of a plane in distress. Apparently the pilot was trying to reach the Dalton airport, which was about 3 miles from the crash scene. The airplane didn't make the airport and the pilot was almost certainly trying to land on the road. Having seen pictures of the aftermath, it appears that the aircraft was not under control when it hit the ground. Perhaps the pilot stalled trying to avoid landing in traffic (this is a busy road), clipped a utility wire, or lost control trying to avoid wires. Plane crashes in north Georgia, kills 1 - Examiner.com http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/sha...06/109692.html (may require registration) Anyway, the point that this accident brings home is that unless you have the opportunity to land on a road that is free of vehicular traffic and which you know to be free of utility wires, land the airplane in a field if you have the chance. Even more important is that you need to fly the airplane all the way to the ground and touch down as slowly as possible. Losing control at 50' almost guarantees a bad outcome. I fly over the crash area all the time and can tell you that there is a fair amount of open land nearby. That pasture (or whatever) may not look as airplane friendly as a paved road, but for a deadstick pilot a road is like a sucker hole for a VFR pilot. It can be a killer when something that looked good from afar goes to you-know-what when you get a look at it up close and personal. My advice to all you pilots is that try to land your plane in crop field in emergency. It is another thing that I have seen planes only in movies and TV. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FWIW, I sat down and had a discussion with a couple old-timers and
instructors about this very subject at my club the other night. They're point of view, which is so painfully simple I can't believe I didn't see it myself... "If the Engine fails, just Fly Vg". Basically, they're whole point was the best way you make sure that you never have to make the 'choice' to try to push a glide to the field is simply to take that out of consideration in engine out situations. Fly Vg from the moment the engine cuts to the moment you begin your round-out... land wherever that puts you. The only kink in the armor is - if you're lined up on final for a runway and you're greater than 250 + your 360 sink altitude, do a 360. If below that mark, use the flaps, or slip if necessary to bleed off energy and not overshoot the runway, but whatever you do, Do not deviate from Vg. Similarly, if you're low... fly Vg. Keep Vg up as long as you can (flaps retracted, of course). If you hit 10 feet above the ground and you're not at the runway, go ahead and flare, you're not going to make it... This is probably a 'duh' to anyone on here ![]() worth mentioning anyways. On Nov 7, 5:12 pm, "Kyle Boatright" wrote: A Lancair was involved in a fatal accident near Dalton, GA yesterday. It crashed in the median of a divided 4 lane highway. The airplane had engine problems and had time to radio distress calls. Depending on the news source, it appears that there might have been as much as 10 to 20 minutes between the first distress call and the crash. One story indicated that the aircraft crashed almost 10 minutes after emergency crews had been notified of a plane in distress. Apparently the pilot was trying to reach the Dalton airport, which was about 3 miles from the crash scene. The airplane didn't make the airport and the pilot was almost certainly trying to land on the road. Having seen pictures of the aftermath, it appears that the aircraft was not under control when it hit the ground. Perhaps the pilot stalled trying to avoid landing in traffic (this is a busy road), clipped a utility wire, or lost control trying to avoid wires. Plane crashes in north Georgia, kills 1 - Examiner.com http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/sha...ing/entries/20... (may require registration) Anyway, the point that this accident brings home is that unless you have the opportunity to land on a road that is free of vehicular traffic and which you know to be free of utility wires, land the airplane in a field if you have the chance. Even more important is that you need to fly the airplane all the way to the ground and touch down as slowly as possible. Losing control at 50' almost guarantees a bad outcome. I fly over the crash area all the time and can tell you that there is a fair amount of open land nearby. That pasture (or whatever) may not look as airplane friendly as a paved road, but for a deadstick pilot a road is like a sucker hole for a VFR pilot. It can be a killer when something that looked good from afar goes to you-know-what when you get a look at it up close and personal. KB |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Fly Vg from the moment the engine
cuts to the moment you begin your round-out... land wherever that puts you. You can do better if you consider the wind. Fly faster than Vg into the wind, slower than Vg with the wind, and you will increase your range (and likelihood of reaching something hospitable). Jose -- "Never trust anything that can think for itself, if you can't see where it keeps its brain." (chapter 10 of book 3 - Harry Potter). for Email, make the obvious change in the address. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Impossibility of Flying Heavy Aircraft Without Training | Immanuel Goldstein | Home Built | 331 | March 10th 06 01:07 AM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |
Antenna ground plane and coax grounding | G. Fred McCutchen | Home Built | 2 | August 8th 04 12:27 PM |
Best dogfight gun? | Bjørnar Bolsøy | Military Aviation | 317 | January 24th 04 06:24 PM |
Antenna Ground Plane Grounding | Fastglasair | Home Built | 1 | July 8th 03 05:21 PM |