![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why ?! Did that on a regular basis (both 25m and ballasted ships), didn't
see any inconvenience. "Bruce Greef" wrote in message ... If you are flying an open class ship or heavily ballasted racer the winch is not such a good idea. Bruce |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bert Willing wrote:
Why ?! Did that on a regular basis (both 25m and ballasted ships), didn't see any inconvenience. "Bruce Greef" wrote in message ... If you are flying an open class ship or heavily ballasted racer the winch is not such a good idea. Bruce OK need to qualify that - in the event of cable breaks. You do have to consider the field when considering whether it is safe to launch any particular glider. There needs to be enough space to run out on an aborted take off, and the field needs to be big/long enough that you avoid a launch where there is a part of the climb with no good options. On our strip, which has a very rough and narrow mid section there is a part of the launch where you would be too low to make the nearby tar runway, and too high to stop on the reasonable part of the runway. I know the solution is to fix the glorified cow paddock we fly from, but getting glider pilots to spend money on non flying stuff is difficult. Similarly it does require some skill to manage the extra energy with the big gliders in the event of a cable break, or abort for whatever reason. With experience on the part of the pilot and winch driver, this is less of an issue. So - if the field is safe for the extra energy involved in this, and your winch is powerful enough winching is no problem. It is quite a sight to watch something like an ASH25 winch launching - and perfectly OK. There are many clubs that do this all the time. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray,
Get in touch with Uli at Airscapes. They've recently ramped up a winch. Frank Whiteley Ray Lovinggood wrote: Bill, Oh, if we only had a winching legacy in the U.S.! Blame those Wright boys from Dayton for inventing the expensive towplane! I would love for our club to have a two-drum winch with about 5,500' of the new poly rope (rather than the steel wire) on each drum and a couple of 'Lepo's' to retrieve the rope. Of course, I wouldn't get rid of the towplane we have, but supplement it with the winch. I haven't been winched in about 20 years, not because I don't want to, but because there isn't a winch operation where I fly. But my first winch launch (a 'cat' launch?) was in the back seat of a G103 and I was elated and impressed. Wow, what a way to fly a sailplane! Also nice was the lack of noise at the start point. The wing runner picks up the wing, the slack in the towline is taken up, then, the glider is just wisked away. Somedays, we could hear the winch and somedays we couldn't. Just ambient noise and the glider is GONE. Now, we are subjected to towplane noise and, in our situation, the noise of power planes as they taxi by to take off. And, oh yea, they have to do their engine run up about where we are staging for launch. Noisy buggers. Yep, a nice winch would be great and would make launching A LOT cheaper! Ray Lovinggood Carrboro, North Carolina, USA I understand where you guys are coming from but it's instructive to look carefully at the actual costs of learning to fly gliders. Glider rental rates are not the big factor. Launch fees are more than half the total cost. Most airplane training operation use trainers that cost far more than a new ASK-21 yet they seem to still have lots of customers. Sleek glass gliders are a big draw. Clunky old trainers drive more people away than they attract with low costs. Training costs do need to be reduced but attack the launch cost with a winch and keep the glass gliders. Bill Daniels |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() How much fun you have has very little to do with your L/D until you start going XC. The 2-33 climbs well and the view is pretty much the same as it is from a glass ship. We have lots of fun here in Oregon with our pay out winch and our 2-33s. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to be flying a DG 1000, but all I can afford at this time is the big, fat, ugly 2-33. If anyone wants to donate a nice glass 2-place ship to us, we will gladly accept! Check out our new winch launch video on my web site: www.nwskysports.com Out on the dry lake we get as high as 2500ft on the pay out winch, at home on our 3000ft runway we can get as high as 1300ft in a good wind. With no wind we can get to about 800ft, which is good enough for landing practice Gary Boggs |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gary,
Wow, that Alvord Desert video is huge! (113 megs) Wayne HP-14 "6F" http://www.soaridaho.com/ wrote in message oups.com... How much fun you have has very little to do with your L/D until you start going XC. The 2-33 climbs well and the view is pretty much the same as it is from a glass ship. We have lots of fun here in Oregon with our pay out winch and our 2-33s. Don't get me wrong, I'd love to be flying a DG 1000, but all I can afford at this time is the big, fat, ugly 2-33. If anyone wants to donate a nice glass 2-place ship to us, we will gladly accept! Check out our new winch launch video on my web site: www.nwskysports.com Out on the dry lake we get as high as 2500ft on the pay out winch, at home on our 3000ft runway we can get as high as 1300ft in a good wind. With no wind we can get to about 800ft, which is good enough for landing practice Gary Boggs |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Vincent wrote:
Another one that drank the coolaid. So, what's your solution, Jim? Jack At 18:54 11 November 2006, Jim Vincent wrote: Jack, Fair question. I'll need a week or so to respond to you since I'm caught up in my honey-do list and a marketing campaign for my company. Not even winter solstice yet...and one of our favorite winter time topics has arisen from the ashes. Personally, I say concede what little youth market there is to paragliding...it is cheap, and highly visible. Even chicks dig it. I am not saying abandon youth programs...but use paragliding as the gateway. Where would soaring be right now without hang-glider types with busted landing gears? I doubt too many of the hang-glider types converted to soaring because they saw a couple of old codgers sitting in lawn chairs scratching their sunspots with a rusty 2-33 pulled up next to them at the mall.(I stole this line from Pez) Remember the forecasts for waves of new recruits upon the release of Thomas Crown Affair 2?. And for that matter, an accomplished hang-glider piilot probably does not need to hear the stories of landing behind the enemy lines in Wacos on Normandy, and spend hours, days, weeks,months pulling 2-33's around on the ground. I don't see a sane business model to build low-price two place ships...the PW-6's are not exactly over-running the market. Towplane costs, insurance and gas are pretty much fixed. Winching would be great...but currently it is rare. Let them learn about thermals in paragliders...then maybe we can snag them later. Our market IMVHO, besides the aforementioned hg's...would be software geeks, and aging skiers, bikers, windsurfers, etc. . |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you want to hook kids, you need to partner with a school and a local
corporation that is willing to put some money into science education, get a winch, and run a low cost after school aviation program. The thing that will hook the kids is the kick in the pants they get with every launch. Mike Schumann "Stewart Kissel" wrote in message ... Jim Vincent wrote: Another one that drank the coolaid. So, what's your solution, Jim? Jack At 18:54 11 November 2006, Jim Vincent wrote: Jack, Fair question. I'll need a week or so to respond to you since I'm caught up in my honey-do list and a marketing campaign for my company. Not even winter solstice yet...and one of our favorite winter time topics has arisen from the ashes. Personally, I say concede what little youth market there is to paragliding...it is cheap, and highly visible. Even chicks dig it. I am not saying abandon youth programs...but use paragliding as the gateway. Where would soaring be right now without hang-glider types with busted landing gears? I doubt too many of the hang-glider types converted to soaring because they saw a couple of old codgers sitting in lawn chairs scratching their sunspots with a rusty 2-33 pulled up next to them at the mall.(I stole this line from Pez) Remember the forecasts for waves of new recruits upon the release of Thomas Crown Affair 2?. And for that matter, an accomplished hang-glider piilot probably does not need to hear the stories of landing behind the enemy lines in Wacos on Normandy, and spend hours, days, weeks,months pulling 2-33's around on the ground. I don't see a sane business model to build low-price two place ships...the PW-6's are not exactly over-running the market. Towplane costs, insurance and gas are pretty much fixed. Winching would be great...but currently it is rare. Let them learn about thermals in paragliders...then maybe we can snag them later. Our market IMVHO, besides the aforementioned hg's...would be software geeks, and aging skiers, bikers, windsurfers, etc. . |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Although I agree the target market is junior/senior HS age,
institutional organizations (including corporations) have lawyered up under 'risk management'. 25-30 years ago, universities had all manner of acitivity/experience clubs, including equipment and gear, on campus. Most of that's been moved off campus now. Campus clubs are mostly social contact groups now. I know a soaring club member whose daughter wanted to introduce her junior ROTC unit to soaring. The school board decided it was too dangerous. Frank Mike Schumann wrote: If you want to hook kids, you need to partner with a school and a local corporation that is willing to put some money into science education, get a winch, and run a low cost after school aviation program. The thing that will hook the kids is the kick in the pants they get with every launch. Mike Schumann "Stewart Kissel" wrote in message ... Jim Vincent wrote: Another one that drank the coolaid. So, what's your solution, Jim? Jack At 18:54 11 November 2006, Jim Vincent wrote: Jack, Fair question. I'll need a week or so to respond to you since I'm caught up in my honey-do list and a marketing campaign for my company. Not even winter solstice yet...and one of our favorite winter time topics has arisen from the ashes. Personally, I say concede what little youth market there is to paragliding...it is cheap, and highly visible. Even chicks dig it. I am not saying abandon youth programs...but use paragliding as the gateway. Where would soaring be right now without hang-glider types with busted landing gears? I doubt too many of the hang-glider types converted to soaring because they saw a couple of old codgers sitting in lawn chairs scratching their sunspots with a rusty 2-33 pulled up next to them at the mall.(I stole this line from Pez) Remember the forecasts for waves of new recruits upon the release of Thomas Crown Affair 2?. And for that matter, an accomplished hang-glider piilot probably does not need to hear the stories of landing behind the enemy lines in Wacos on Normandy, and spend hours, days, weeks,months pulling 2-33's around on the ground. I don't see a sane business model to build low-price two place ships...the PW-6's are not exactly over-running the market. Towplane costs, insurance and gas are pretty much fixed. Winching would be great...but currently it is rare. Let them learn about thermals in paragliders...then maybe we can snag them later. Our market IMVHO, besides the aforementioned hg's...would be software geeks, and aging skiers, bikers, windsurfers, etc. . |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Still more Airbus woes (1) | john smith | Piloting | 11 | June 17th 06 09:42 PM |
Still more Airbus woes (3) | john smith | Piloting | 0 | June 14th 06 03:37 PM |
Still more Airbus woes (2) | john smith | Piloting | 0 | June 14th 06 03:35 PM |
Australia chooses Airbus tankers | John Cook | Military Aviation | 0 | April 16th 04 10:25 AM |
Airbus Aiming at U.S. Military Market | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | September 21st 03 08:55 PM |