![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah wrote:
Yesterday would have been a wonderful day to get a couple hours of actual with your instructor! Although it was a bit windy underneath, it was pretty smooth in the clouds and on top (about 6-8k). Get the IFR and then you will be eager to fly on days like yesterday! Actually right now would be perfect as well. Unfortunately my instructor just took a part 135 job in Ct so I am currently not in a committed relationship! :^ ) I've got 2.2 of actual. I think it is fun. A little vertigo the first time I punched a hole in a cloud. But I got used to it. The training really matters. Scan scan scan. KC |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Kevin Clarke wrote in
nk.net: Actually right now would be perfect as well. Unfortunately my instructor just took a part 135 job in Ct so I am currently not in a committed relationship! :^ ) I've got 2.2 of actual. I think it is fun. A little vertigo the first time I punched a hole in a cloud. But I got used to it. The training really matters. Scan scan scan. Get yourself another instructor pronto! ![]() And yes, the training - and the currency - are really important. The scan needs to be second nature otherwise you can find yourself in trouble at just the wrong times - getting up or getting down. If you haven't flown instruments in a few months, you can lose that second nature for a few minutes - perhaps long enough to get yourself into trouble... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah" wrote in messagesnip
Maybe it's the lousy weather and everyone is just ****ed off that they are stuck inside. Could be, I think it hit me earlier when the Direct TV guys rescheduled 7 times on me. Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Judah,
I agree with your assessment (sp?). However, looking at how some people even hijack this thread to insult group members while hiding behind their "simple explanations of a plain guy" mask, I am clueless at an explanation. Genocide and lynching is openly advocated here with only a trace of opposition, personal if dyslexic attacks have become the norm. Sad. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Genocide and lynching is openly advocated here with only a trace of opposition A lack of a response in this group does not always indicate an acceptance of a presented view. -- Peter |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
Thomas Borchert wrote: Genocide and lynching is openly advocated here with only a trace of opposition A lack of a response in this group does not always indicate an acceptance of a presented view. Exactly right. When the "Thrown out of a FBO" thread got politicized, I stopped reading it. There must have been dozens of messages I never even glanced at.... no telling what I missed. Restoration of the Third Reich? Pol Pot's preferred sexual positions? Who knows? I nuked Numbnuts for .... this? -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mortimer Schnerd, RN" mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com wrote:
There must have been dozens of messages I never even glanced at... Exactly. no telling what I missed. Restoration of the Third Reich? Pol Pot's preferred sexual positions? Who knows? LOL! ![]() -- Peter |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter,
A lack of a response in this group does not always indicate an acceptance of a presented view. Sure. But IMHO there are some views that should elicit a responce from a majority of the group here in order to save its civility. -- Thomas Borchert (EDDH) |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thomas Borchert wrote:
Peter, A lack of a response in this group does not always indicate an acceptance of a presented view. Sure. But IMHO there are some views that should elicit a responce from a majority of the group here in order to save its civility. Internet civility. A new oxymoron? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:50:59 +0100, Thomas Borchert wrote in :
A lack of a response in this group does not always indicate an acceptance of a presented view. Sure. But IMHO there are some views that should elicit a responce from a majority of the group here in order to save its civility. Flaming trolls tends to breed more trolls and flames. Great article here, with links to others: http://lipas.uwasa.fi/~ts/http/crackpot.html Marty -- The Big-8 hierarchies (comp, humanities, misc, news, rec, sci, soc, talk) are under new management. See http://www.big-8.org for details. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Airport Support Groups - Group Email? | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 17 | September 13th 04 01:26 AM |
A New KSAN? | A Guy Called Tyketto | Piloting | 3 | February 20th 04 02:53 PM |
Air Force Museum Working Group to release final report | Otis Willie | Military Aviation | 0 | November 18th 03 12:28 AM |
A-4 / A-7 Question | Tank Fixer | Military Aviation | 135 | October 25th 03 03:59 AM |
New email group for ASW-27 owners... | Steve Koerner | Soaring | 1 | October 13th 03 08:40 PM |