![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On Nov 23, 9:56 am, "w_tom" wrote: There is no stopping or blocking of lightning as plug-in protector manufacturers hope you believe. The best information I have seen on surges and surge protection is at http://www.mikeholt.com/files/PDF/Li...ion_May051.pdf - the title is "How to protect your house and its contents from lightning: IEEE guide for surge protection of equipment connected to AC power and communication circuits" published by the IEEE in 2005 (the IEEE is the dominant organization of electrical and electronic engineers in the US). A second guide is http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/p.../surgesfnl.pdf - this is the "NIST recommended practice guide: Surges Happen!: how to protect the appliances in your home" published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (the US government agency formerly called the National Bureau of Standards) in 2001 Both guides were intended for wide distribution to the general public to explain surges and how to protect against them. The IEEE guide was targeted at people who have some (not much) technical background. Both say plug-in surge suppressors are effective. All interconnected devices, like a computer and printer, need to connect to the same surge protector. If a device, like a computer, has external connections like phone or LAN, all those wires have to run through the surge suppressor for protection. This type of suppressor is called a surge reference equalizer (SRE) by the IEEE (also described by the NIST). The voltage on all wires connected to the SRE (power, phone, CATV, LAN, ...) are clamped to a common ground at the SRE and the voltages are held to a value that is safe to the connected device. Ratings vary from junk to very high. While a single point ground with phone, CATV, ... protectors connecting with short wires to the grounding electrode wire at the power service is best for eliminating the ground potential differences in Doug's post, SREs also provide protection. That protector also does not stop or absorb anything. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Effective protectors make a short and temporary connection to earth. As is clearly described in the IEEE guide, plug-in suppressors work by clamping,.They do not work primarily by earthing, or stopping, blocking, absorbing. Many believe a plug-in protector will somehow stop or absorb what 3 miles of sky could not. Among those who believe that are the IEEE and NIST. -- bud-- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() bud-- wrote: On Nov 23, 9:56 am, "w_tom" wrote: There is no stopping or blocking of lightning as plug-in protector manufacturers hope you believe. The best information I have seen on surges and surge protection is at http://www.mikeholt.com/files/PDF/Li...ion_May051.pdf - the title is "How to protect your house and its contents from lightning: IEEE guide for surge protection of equipment connected to AC power and communication circuits" published by the IEEE in 2005 (the IEEE is the dominant organization of electrical and electronic engineers in the US). A second guide is http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/p.../surgesfnl.pdf - this is the "NIST recommended practice guide: Surges Happen!: how to protect the appliances in your home" published by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (the US government agency formerly called the National Bureau of Standards) in 2001 Both guides were intended for wide distribution to the general public to explain surges and how to protect against them. The IEEE guide was targeted at people who have some (not much) technical background. Both say plug-in surge suppressors are effective. All interconnected devices, like a computer and printer, need to connect to the same surge protector. If a device, like a computer, has external connections like phone or LAN, all those wires have to run through the surge suppressor for protection. This type of suppressor is called a surge reference equalizer (SRE) by the IEEE (also described by the NIST). The voltage on all wires connected to the SRE (power, phone, CATV, LAN, ...) are clamped to a common ground at the SRE and the voltages are held to a value that is safe to the connected device. Ratings vary from junk to very high. While a single point ground with phone, CATV, ... protectors connecting with short wires to the grounding electrode wire at the power service is best for eliminating the ground potential differences in Doug's post, SREs also provide protection. That protector also does not stop or absorb anything. A protector is only as effective as its earth ground. Effective protectors make a short and temporary connection to earth. As is clearly described in the IEEE guide, plug-in suppressors work by clamping,.They do not work primarily by earthing, or stopping, blocking, absorbing. Many believe a plug-in protector will somehow stop or absorb what 3 miles of sky could not. Among those who believe that are the IEEE and NIST. I suggest that you go back and re-read your references. For instance, on pg. 38: Well-designed and well-built plug-in protectors will actually withstand the 10,000 A (8x20 µs) surge current, and that is rating required by NFPA 780-2004 for plug-in protectors. However, the UL 1449 Standard only requires plug-in protectors to withstand, without damage, ~20 500 A surges. Inexpensive protectors using the 6C type of circuit are designed to respond to overload by opening the protective fusing shown in Figure 6C, sometimes at surge currents barely over the 500 A limit. Because the UL 500 A surge withstand requirements are relatively weak, it is important to have both a hard-wired protector at the service entrance and a plug-in protector at the critical loads. This clearly recommends that you don't depend upon a surge protector alone, simply because the minimum UL requirements are REALLY a minimum. Most people don't know that surge protectors use devices (MOVs) that have a limited life, and they don't have a visible indicator showing how much of their life is left. High quality surge protectors are sold by www.zerosurge.com. The IEEE report confirms what w_tom was saying about voltage differentials on the building grounding during a lightning strike: If wiring comes into a building at many different points, it is much more difficult to get proper protection against lightning surges. Even if surge protectors are installed at these alternate entry points, the long ground wires running back to the main building ground greatly reduce the effectiveness of the protectors. In highlightning areas, where lightning protection is a major concern, it is worth routing as many AC and signal cables as possible past the building power entry point, to facilitate good grounding for protectors and cable sheaths I highly recommend a thorough reading of the IEEE document for a complete discussion of this issue. The take home message: individual surge protection devices ARE NOT a complete lightning protection plan. Tom Seim Richland, WA |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mike the Strike wrote: From the latest SSA news: "While I know this is going to sound like an excuse right up there with "The dog ate my homework assignment..." last week the Carswell house in Midlothian TX was struck by lightning (really). Well, here in Tucson, we are sometimes known as the "lightning capital" of America...and I have to tell you, we have a tree in the front yard that was struck last year, while we were sitting in the house...sounded like a terrorist bomb attack. The house shook, the power wavered off and on, and the dogs went to hide. I firmly believe the story! I have yet (lo, these many years) ever been able to recover a hard drive from any power surge that great....sorry, I don't hold much hope! Good luck. micki minner |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
My mobile medical unit was struck by lightning while traveling on the
interstate near Junction, TX some years ago. The bolt struck the left forward corner of the trailer and traveled forward to the tractor wiping out the lights, engine computer, gauges, head, taillight and marker bulbs and much of the wiring and rearward through the trailer where the only damage was to the ceramic insulators in the x-ray processor heater located at least 25 feet aft of the strike. The trailer framing is steel so the charge apparently traveled through it to the road protecting the x-ray equipment; the entire cab on the tractor (GMC Astro), however is fibreglass and the wiring, gauges, engine, frame rails and computer were the pathway. The driver was badly frightened, but otherwise OK. I'm mildly curious as to what pathway lightning might follow through my carbon and glass fibre glider (not curious enough to experiment however). Like Micki, I also believe the story. Ray Warshaw 1LK MickiMinner wrote: Mike the Strike wrote: From the latest SSA news: "While I know this is going to sound like an excuse right up there with "The dog ate my homework assignment..." last week the Carswell house in Midlothian TX was struck by lightning (really). Well, here in Tucson, we are sometimes known as the "lightning capital" of America...and I have to tell you, we have a tree in the front yard that was struck last year, while we were sitting in the house...sounded like a terrorist bomb attack. The house shook, the power wavered off and on, and the dogs went to hide. I firmly believe the story! I have yet (lo, these many years) ever been able to recover a hard drive from any power surge that great....sorry, I don't hold much hope! Good luck. micki minner |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'm mildly curious as to what pathway lightning might follow through my
carbon and glass fibre glider (not curious enough to experiment however). Like Micki, I also believe the story. Ray Warshaw 1LK Vehicles are quite often struck by lightning and the damage varies from nothing at all to (most often) damage to electrical and electronic components, occasionally blown tires and (rarely) broken glass. Lightning injuries inside vehicles are rare, but have been reported. Damage to gliders depends on the current magnitude and duration of the strike. Many gliders have survived weak cloud flashes with little physical damage - I have personally examined two. The larger currents of ground flashes can be more exciting as the arcs inside the glider structure cause a large pressure pulse that can split a wing or blow off the canopy. A severe positive ground flash blew a glider apart in Britain a few years ago. You may get a few warning signs when approaching an electrified cloud. My Discus 2 produces small sparks from the release handle to my left leg! Definitely a sign that you should fly somewhere else! Mike |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike the Strike wrote:
A severe positive ground flash blew a glider apart in Britain a few years ago. That was a K-21. The strike entered at one aileron push rod and traveled to the other aileron push-rod, where it exited, through the spanwise alloy push-rods and control linkage. Ohmic heating in the control linkage produced a strong enough pressure pulse to cut the fuselage in half and to blow out both canopies. The skins were blown off both wings as well. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org | |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Gregorie wrote:
Mike the Strike wrote: A severe positive ground flash blew a glider apart in Britain a few years ago. That was a K-21. The strike entered at one aileron push rod and traveled to the other aileron push-rod, where it exited, through the spanwise alloy push-rods and control linkage. Ohmic heating in the control linkage produced a strong enough pressure pulse to cut the fuselage in half and to blow out both canopies. The skins were blown off both wings as well. Did the pilots report noticing any sparks, tingling, or other "electrification" before the strike? I've had lightning strike within a mile of my glider without noticing any signs of it, before or after. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly "Transponders in Sailplanes" on the Soaring Safety Foundation website www.soaringsafety.org/prevention/articles.html "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
You must mean the ASK21 GBP which was destroyed near the London Gliding
Club, Dunstable on 17th April 1999. The AAIB report may be found at http://www.aaib.gov.uk/cms_resources...pdf_500699.pdf . The pictures and other illustrations do not appear to be available, though I have them, downloaded when the report was first published. W.J. (Bill) Dean (U.K.). Remove "ic" to reply. "Mike the Strike" wrote in message oups.com... I'm mildly curious as to what pathway lightning might follow through my carbon and glass fibre glider (not curious enough to experiment however). Like Micki, I also believe the story. Ray Warshaw 1LK Vehicles are quite often struck by lightning and the damage varies from nothing at all to (most often) damage to electrical and electronic components, occasionally blown tires and (rarely) broken glass. Lightning injuries inside vehicles are rare, but have been reported. Damage to gliders depends on the current magnitude and duration of the strike. Many gliders have survived weak cloud flashes with little physical damage - I have personally examined two. The larger currents of ground flashes can be more exciting as the arcs inside the glider structure cause a large pressure pulse that can split a wing or blow off the canopy. A severe positive ground flash blew a glider apart in Britain a few years ago. You may get a few warning signs when approaching an electrified cloud. My Discus 2 produces small sparks from the release handle to my left leg! Definitely a sign that you should fly somewhere else! Mike |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sounds like the bonding strap may be broken on your pedals, or possibly
it was not replaced properly when the tow hook was serviced. Although fixing this may make your early warning less effective, you will be better off in the long run. Mike the Strike wrote: You may get a few warning signs when approaching an electrified cloud. My Discus 2 produces small sparks from the release handle to my left leg! Definitely a sign that you should fly somewhere else! |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() MickiMinner wrote: Mike the Strike wrote: From the latest SSA news: "While I know this is going to sound like an excuse right up there with "The dog ate my homework assignment..." last week the Carswell house in Midlothian TX was struck by lightning (really). Well, here in Tucson, we are sometimes known as the "lightning capital" of America...and I have to tell you, we have a tree in the front yard that was struck last year, while we were sitting in the house...sounded like a terrorist bomb attack. The house shook, the power wavered off and on, and the dogs went to hide. I firmly believe the story! I have yet (lo, these many years) ever been able to recover a hard drive from any power surge that great....sorry, I don't hold much hope! Good luck. micki minner http://www.lightningsafety.noaa.gov/images/map.pdf shows the propensity for lightning. Florida has the most casualties, mostly on golf courses, but trails behind many states in intensity. The most intense storms I've personally experienced were in Nebraska and Turkey. Colorado has a lot of tornadoes, but tipping a shed or cow makes little news. Frank Whiteley |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSA and IRS | Pete Reinhart | Soaring | 12 | October 12th 06 07:59 PM |
SSA in Crisis: Can It Heal Itself? [LONG] | [email protected] | Soaring | 45 | October 5th 06 04:15 PM |
"For military, 'Lightning' strikes again" | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | September 18th 06 03:17 PM |
AOPA Truth Squad | skylunelives | Piloting | 29 | January 13th 06 04:42 AM |
OUCH! Lightning hits airplane......... | Aardvark | Piloting | 4 | February 8th 04 04:46 PM |