A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Instrument Flight Rules
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

X-country training flight



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 6th 04, 08:09 PM
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"dlevy" wrote in message
. ..
Should I file individual legs? I don't need to land. If I file
individual legs should I let the controller know before the approach that
I'd like to open the next leg at the missed?

Thanks!


When I did a similar thing, I put in the remarks section of the flight plan
PLA (practice low approach) at where ever and this never seemed to be a
problem. Then as the PLA airfield was approached, I just asked for the
appropriate approach with a miss and hold. Usually the approach controllers
just said to let then know when I wanted to move on and they cleared me on
my way.
It seemed really straight forward.

Chris


  #2  
Old December 7th 04, 06:11 AM
C Kingsbury
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"dlevy" wrote in message
. ..
Should I file individual legs? I don't need to land. If I file

individual
legs should I let the controller know before the approach that I'd like to
open the next leg at the missed?


I think it depends a lot on how many sectors you're going to be crossing on
the flight. For instance, when I go from BED to do some approaches at MHT
(~40nm) I'll be worked by at least two approach controllers. When I call
800-WX-BRIEF it's a toss-up whether I get Burlington or Bridgeport. The guys
in Burlington usually say, "Oh, just do it as a round robin" and put that
in. Then I get to MHT, and after the first miss, approach goes into a tizzy
trying to figure out what to do next, and would usually end up filing a new
flight plan for us. Bridgeport OTOH would say file two flight plans, and
Manchester approach (now called Boston for some reason) would just give us a
new clearance and squawk after we're done swimming laps in their pool. In
this case what we would do is notify the approach controller when we first
check in after being handed off. "Boston Approach, Cessna 4955D with you at
3000, practice approaches at Manchester then looking for clearance back to
Bedford" or something similar usually did the trick.

OTOH you can go to BED, LWM, and BVY, with the same controller handling you
the whole time, and in this case I've always filed the round-robin and it's
never caused any confusion.

-cwk.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) Rich Stowell Aerobatics 28 January 2nd 09 02:26 PM
PC flight sim for training? ivo welch Instrument Flight Rules 19 January 29th 06 09:54 PM
Flight Simulator 2004 pro 4CDs, Eurowings 2004, Sea Plane Adventures, Concorde, HONG KONG 2004, World Airlines, other Addons, Sky Ranch, Jumbo 747, Greece 2000 [include El.Venizelos], Polynesia 2000, Real Airports, Private Wings, FLITESTAR V8.5 - JEP vvcd Home Built 0 September 22nd 04 07:16 PM
Logging approaches Ron Garrison Instrument Flight Rules 109 March 2nd 04 05:54 PM
Sim time loggable? [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 12 December 6th 03 07:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.