![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dan" wrote in message What's the difference between "Air Taxi" and
Charter or Part 135 operations? While tracking some flights via FlightAware, I notice that some planes fly under their tail numbers most of the time, but at times there is a "T" prefixed to the tail number in the system. I read that this signifies an "air taxi" operation. How is this different from charter or 135? If they are the same, they why are all 135 ops not prefixed with the "T" identifier? The 'T' signifies that the flight is a commercial operator. Prior to Sept. 11, few pilots bothered to read the AIM to know this. Immediately following Sept. 11, it was mandatory. Now it is optional, but ATC will handle the commercial operator with confidence knowing the flight is flown by professionals. D. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Capt.Doug" wrote:
Now it is optional, but ATC will handle the commercial operator with confidence knowing the flight is flown by professionals. What does that mean? Does ATC treat non-professional pilots differently? -- Peter |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter R. wrote:
"Capt.Doug" wrote: Now it is optional, but ATC will handle the commercial operator with confidence knowing the flight is flown by professionals. What does that mean? Does ATC treat non-professional pilots differently? I don't think so. I flew for a check courier outfit that had our flights identified as "WrapAir Flight 700" or whatever the flight number was. They KNEW we were flying commercially.... the FSS was right there on the company's home field at Raleigh-Durham (NC). I would stop in every afternoon to check out the radar returns for my evening flight to my home in Charlotte. I've also flown for a freight outfit that identified all their flights as "Saber Flight So and So". We actually had an interline agreement and could deadhead for free on part 121 airlines. I would assume the FAA knew we were a commercial operation as well. Then there was the charter operation, where I flew "Twin Cessna 32Q". The flight was listed under my name and contact numbers. I don't see how they could have known whether I was a commercial or private flight. As best as I could tell, the FAA treated my flights all the same. And to think about it, they always treated me well, except the one time I went into JFK in a C-414 and asked the clearance guy to repeat himself four times. I finally told him we could play this game all afternoon or he could repeat it once slow enough for me to get it. Sheesh...never had that problem at any other airport. But I am a Southerner. G -- Mortimer Schnerd, RN mschnerdatcarolina.rr.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
YES!............................................No question about that.
Karl "Peter R." wrote in message ... "Capt.Doug" wrote: Now it is optional, but ATC will handle the commercial operator with confidence knowing the flight is flown by professionals. What does that mean? Does ATC treat non-professional pilots differently? -- Peter |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter R. wrote: "Capt.Doug" wrote: Now it is optional, but ATC will handle the commercial operator with confidence knowing the flight is flown by professionals. What does that mean? Does ATC treat non-professional pilots differently? ATC treats pilots differently based on what ATC knows. For example here at KBIL we have a locally based air taxi operator hauling passengers and several hauling cargo. The cargo pilots, I can get them to give me base turns at the approach end of the runway, climbing turns at 50 feet agl and a report of traffic in sight when we both know there's no way because they know I need it. Immediate takeoffs with none of that futzing around crap on the runway setting DG's, etc. Lots of local GA pilots are the same, especially here because most of us like to go play bush pilot in our spare time. The operators flying passengers can't give me any of that. A transient pilot I have to go by the way you respond to me. Give me some ahh's and uhh's and you wait. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps wrote:
A transient pilot I have to go by the way you respond to me. Give me some ahh's and uhh's and you wait. That's been my observation, which is why I asked. I have heard amateur pilots who sound and respond like seasoned professionals, and I have heard professionals who sound and respond like amateurs. -- Peter |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Capt.Doug wrote:
***** The 'T' signifies that the flight is a commercial operator. Prior to Sept. 11, few pilots bothered to read the AIM to know this. Immediately following Sept. 11, it was mandatory. Now it is optional, but ATC will handle the commercial operator with confidence knowing the flight is flown by professionals. ***** Capt. D is exactly right on the resurrection of the Tango prefix post 9-11. We still see it regularly, but I'd estimate that fewer than 5% of qualifying flights use it. In my experience, a pilot using the Tango prefix doesn't warrant any special consideration or presumption of a higher level of skill. Most of my colleagues are vaguely familiar with the use of the prefix, at best. Many pilots filing it don't even use it when identifying themselves on the radio. It is generally irrelevant to ATC. Chad Speer PP-ASEL, IA ATCS, Kansas City ARTCC |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
When the controllers went of strike 25 years ago, the Tango
November go you an IFR clearance. But Lifeguard is even better. "Chad Speer" wrote in message oups.com... | Capt.Doug wrote: | | ***** | The 'T' signifies that the flight is a commercial operator. Prior to | Sept. 11, few pilots bothered to read the AIM to know this. Immediately | following Sept. 11, it was mandatory. Now it is optional, but ATC will | handle the commercial operator with confidence knowing the flight is | flown by professionals. | ***** | | | Capt. D is exactly right on the resurrection of the Tango prefix post | 9-11. We still see it regularly, but I'd estimate that fewer than 5% | of qualifying flights use it. | | In my experience, a pilot using the Tango prefix doesn't warrant any | special consideration or presumption of a higher level of skill. Most | of my colleagues are vaguely familiar with the use of the prefix, at | best. Many pilots filing it don't even use it when identifying | themselves on the radio. It is generally irrelevant to ATC. | | | Chad Speer | PP-ASEL, IA | ATCS, Kansas City ARTCC | |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Chad Speer" wrote in message oups.com... | Capt.Doug wrote: | | ***** | The 'T' signifies that the flight is a commercial operator. It signifies the flight is not Part 91. It says nothing about the operator. Prior to | Sept. 11, few pilots bothered to read the AIM to know this. Immediately | following Sept. 11, it was mandatory. Now it is optional, but ATC will | handle the commercial operator with confidence knowing the flight is | flown by professionals. Using the T indicates no such thing with ATC. Any kid with a couple hundred hours could be the pilot. He would be a professional in name only. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Internet public meeting on National Air Tour Standards begins Feb. 23 at 9 a.m. | Larry Dighera | Piloting | 0 | February 22nd 04 03:58 PM |
taxi in reverse? | Malcolm Teas | Home Built | 10 | February 21st 04 12:26 AM |
Flight instructors as Charter Pilots | C J Campbell | Piloting | 6 | January 24th 04 07:51 AM |
Why don't airlines also do charter jets? | Scott T. Jensen | General Aviation | 18 | January 6th 04 07:24 PM |
FAA to End part 91 Sightseeing flights? | Vaughn | Rotorcraft | 7 | November 2nd 03 01:20 AM |