![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8 Feb 2007 13:36:02 -0800, Jay Honeck wrote:
Supposedly Microsoft is going to be issuing a patch to make it run better. FS2004 is just a better product, until they do. Pretty much right on target with that assessment. -- Dallas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck wrote:
Supposedly Microsoft is going to be issuing a patch to make it run better. FS2004 is just a better product, until they do. That patch is called Vista. Of course you are going to have to upgrade your computer to run it. ![]() |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gig 601XL Builder writes:
That patch is called Vista. Of course you are going to have to upgrade your computer to run it. ![]() Which means that it's really not running better after all. Vista runs everything slower, since all that DRM code interferes in absolutely everything the OS does. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
Unfortunately, even with the fastest computer, the frame rates on FSX are not acceptable. In certain, high-graphics-intense situations, the simulation becomes more of a slide show unless you turn realism settings to unacceptably low levels. Is this true even on your super-duper Kiwi? -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Unfortunately, even with the fastest computer, the frame rates on FSX
are not acceptable. In certain, high-graphics-intense situations, the simulation becomes more of a slide show unless you turn realism settings to unacceptably low levels. Is this true even on your super-duper Kiwi? Yep. FSX runs acceptably -- which is better than most people will get -- but "acceptably" isn't what I'm looking for in a flight simulator. FS2004 runs fantastically -- and that's what we're sticking with, until further notice. -- Jay Honeck Iowa City, iA Pathfinder N56993 www.AlexisParkInn.com "Your Aviation Destination" |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay Honeck writes:
Yep. FSX runs acceptably -- which is better than most people will get -- but "acceptably" isn't what I'm looking for in a flight simulator. FS2004 runs fantastically -- and that's what we're sticking with, until further notice. A wise decision, IMO. Don't fix what isn't broken. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-02-08 22:28, Dallas wrote:
On 8 Feb 2007 08:34:25 -0800, wrote: Is Meigs gone? I've got FSX but I hate it so much I can't bring myself to load it up to look for you.. A friend is doing a simulated round-the-world trip in FSX and as he happened to pass by Chicago recently, he took this screenshot showing Meigs is indeed gone in that world too: http://users.telenet.be/lange/images/ATW/atw_39.jpg |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AOPA Stall/Spin Study -- Stowell's Review (8,000 words) | Rich Stowell | Aerobatics | 28 | January 2nd 09 02:26 PM |
CRS: V-22 Osprey Tilt-Rotor Aircraft | Mike | Naval Aviation | 0 | August 30th 06 02:11 PM |
Air Force One Had to Intercept Some Inadvertent Flyers / How? | Rick Umali | Piloting | 29 | February 15th 06 04:40 AM |
Most reliable homebuilt helicopter? | tom pettit | Home Built | 35 | September 29th 05 02:24 PM |
terminology questions: turtledeck? cantilever wing? | Ric | Home Built | 2 | September 13th 05 09:39 PM |