Wings, Wires, and Watercolors-001 index

"Luke" skrev i en meddelelse
...

"Joe Gertler" wrote in message
. 120...

Can anyone help me to find Mitchell Holman's legal address?


Here is your shopping list:

1) Get a life.
2) Get an education on how Usenet actually works.
3) Get your own damn private investigator. You want us to help you
try to burn a regular here? LOL
4) Get a lawyer to explain the actuall prosecutability of your
complaint.
5) Get a grip. These puny 200dpi scans don't represent a real
threat to the profitability of your "six figure invetment".
6) Get out your checkbook... Pursuing this complaint will only
ensure you loose more than you collect.

Luke

That's right Luke - ad insult to injury . . .

"Paul Stewart" wrote in message
k...

"Luke" skrev i en meddelelse
...

"Joe Gertler" wrote in message
. 120...

Can anyone help me to find Mitchell Holman's legal address?


Here is your shopping list:

1) Get a life.
2) Get an education on how Usenet actually works.
3) Get your own damn private investigator. You want us to help you
try to burn a regular here? LOL
4) Get a lawyer to explain the actuall prosecutability of your
complaint.
5) Get a grip. These puny 200dpi scans don't represent a real
threat to the profitability of your "six figure invetment".
6) Get out your checkbook... Pursuing this complaint will only
ensure you loose more than you collect.

Luke

That's right Luke - ad insult to injury . . .


So, sue me....


Luke

Hello, Luke!
You wrote on Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:50:10 -0600:


L "Paul Stewart" wrote in message
L k...

"Luke" skrev i en meddelelse
...

"Joe Gertler" wrote in message
. 120...

Can anyone help me to find Mitchell Holman's legal address?


Here is your shopping list:

1) Get a life.
2) Get an education on how Usenet actually works.
3) Get your own damn private investigator. You want us to help
you try to burn a regular here? LOL
4) Get a lawyer to explain the actuall prosecutability of your
complaint.
5) Get a grip. These puny 200dpi scans don't represent a real
threat to the profitability of your "six figure invetment".
6) Get out your checkbook... Pursuing this complaint will only
ensure you loose more than you collect.

Luke

That's right Luke - ad insult to injury . . .

Why? - do you need attention?

"Enzo Matrix" wrote in


The problem is that this is usenet, not a website. If it were a
website, Mr Holman could actually delete the images as you asked. On
usenet that isn't actually possible. Mr Holman could issue a cancel
message for each of the posts, but that won't guarantee that the posts
will actually get wiped from usenet servers. Some servers simply don't
accept cancels. With usenet, once a post is out there, it is
effectively out there for ever.

I can understand how you would be annoyed about unauthorised use of
your images, however I would suggest that the damage to your business
is probably minimal. The images as posted here were simply not of a
high enough resolution or quality to be printed out and sold.


Thank you for that information, Enzo (and others). It is reassuring. And
thanks to all for your comments, including Luke whose comments I
cannot/would not argue with. Well, Most of them, anyway...
This is not your problem. I should have sought professional advice on
such a matter. My sincere (NOT sacrcastic) apologies for ruffling any
feathers. Please do not trouble yourselves with further discussion, and
return to your enjoyment of aviation images.

"Steve Vernon" wrote in message
. ..
you may not know this, but you can't delete anything from a newsgroup.

Actually YOU can delete your own post but no one else can - u wuld use a
control message in the header eg.
Control: cancel

"Joe Gertler" wrote in message
20...
"Paul Stewart" wrote in
:

It's his M.O. - he post other peoples material with no regard for
copyrights or laws . . .

Dear Don, Ray, & Paul;
Thank you for the supporting comments. I was hoping that my defensive post
would not be taken as an over-reaction.

I also have thousands of private aviation photos that I DO scan and share
and send high-res images of (free of course) to many researchers and
buffs,
and modelers, on various aviation forums. I posted a lot of my aviation
art
collection on my website so others could enjoy viewing it. But that was
some four years ago... THESE days(after being advised by those with more
Internet experience) I tend to overlay all the images with a text
indicating copyrighted material. 99.9% of Internet surfers respect that
and
are content to enjoy and correspond about it. But I've learned there are a
few pitfalls to posting images, on occassion. I rarely mind copying for
personal use, but when you see copies (of material that cost you a pretty
penny) printed out on some copier, and sold on EBAY, (without any credit
or
permission) it can be upsetting. And when you want to use one of your
images in a magazine article, and the editor says it is now a common
image
seen all over the Internet, so they don't want to use it, That can be a
little upsetting, also.

Haven't used the newsgroups in a while. I've never seen these Exclamation
point/red icons before, in the threads. Do you put them in yourSELVES, or
are they put in by some group Moderator?

for every proven copyright violation it's a fine of $25,000.00 - Hey, if
anyone used or edited one of my images without my permission I wouldn't
hesitate...I could use an extra 25,000!! Lawyer fees are gonna run you
about $1600.00. I been down this road before..The hard part is you'll have
to prove loss of funds!!! When the other party is found at fault you'll
get to collect for the next 25 years all the monies owed - Doesn't matter it
the other faulted party doesn't have all the cash - I was able to get the
court to deduct the fine from the faulted partied home - they lost their
home!

Most individuals don't realize that they are breaking the law when they
simply scan an image from a book or magazine...that is copyright violation!