![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() BT wrote: what that heck are you talking about... safety... photo ops? Anyone can safely fly 1000ft above a heavy.. or in ATC approach airspace.. IFR.. 3 miles lateral. ATC only needs one foot above a heavier aircraft to provide wake turbulence separation, 100 feet above is the practical minimum as that's what the mode C reports. Three miles only works until you are directly behind. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Newps.. I was referring to IFR separation rules.. as both the A380 and the
Bo taking the pictures were on IFR clearances.. BT "Newps" wrote in message . .. BT wrote: what that heck are you talking about... safety... photo ops? Anyone can safely fly 1000ft above a heavy.. or in ATC approach airspace.. IFR.. 3 miles lateral. ATC only needs one foot above a heavier aircraft to provide wake turbulence separation, 100 feet above is the practical minimum as that's what the mode C reports. Three miles only works until you are directly behind. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
7 miles away it was save.
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Aluckyguess writes: I was flying into Van Nuys this morning IFR when ATC told us to look 11:00 and we should be able to see the new Airbus's making its first Flight into LAX. I took a few pictures. http://kevinandrews.com/this_is_the_...s_superjum.htm Even ATC fell under the spell? Photo ops first, safety second. Or was "traffic a factor" legitimately in this case? (Seems unlikely if you were descending into VNY and the Scarebus was descending into LAX, unless that wake turbulence is even worse than they've been saying.) -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote in
: Aluckyguess writes: I was flying into Van Nuys this morning IFR when ATC told us to look 11:00 and we should be able to see the new Airbus's making its first Flight into LAX. I took a few pictures. http://kevinandrews.com/this_is_the_...s_superjum.htm Even ATC fell under the spell? Photo ops first, safety second. Or was "traffic a factor" legitimately in this case? (Seems unlikely if you were descending into VNY and the Scarebus was descending into LAX, unless that wake turbulence is even worse than they've been saying.) your cluelessness knows no bounds , does it? Bertie |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Aluckyguess wrote:
we should be able to see the new Airbus's making its first Flight into LAX. Lucky bastage! I'd have gone to the show, but I've got ruddy classes in the morning. :*( TheSmokingGnu |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "TheSmokingGnu" wrote in message ... Aluckyguess wrote: we should be able to see the new Airbus's making its first Flight into LAX. Lucky bastage! I'd have gone to the show, but I've got ruddy classes in the morning. :*( TheSmokingGnu I did feel lucky. My CFI asked if I would pick one of his pilots up at VNY. He was in a King Air I was in my A36 and we beat him there. He did a missed approach so we were able to get in first. I am doing my IFR training so I got a free session in actual IFR. The Airbus was just icing on the cake. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Aluckyguess" wrote in message ... I was flying into Van Nuys this morning IFR when ATC told us to look 11:00 and we should be able to see the new Airbus's making its first Flight into LAX. I took a few pictures. http://kevinandrews.com/this_is_the_...s_superjum.htm Cool! Thanks for the photos! I bet that was pretty cool to see. I was coming in to my home base Sunday night, which is close to our big airport, and had a cargo 747 pass above me. I thought that thing looked big, I bet the 380 looked HUGE..... Thanks again... John |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Riley" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:19:31 -0700, "Aluckyguess" wrote: I was flying into Van Nuys this morning IFR when ATC told us to look 11:00 and we should be able to see the new Airbus's making its first Flight into LAX. I took a few pictures. http://kevinandrews.com/this_is_the_...s_superjum.htm I Tivoed the local news covering the landing at LA. If you can find any on the web, it's interesting. The wind was pretty calm, but the captain was working the rudder a LOT on landing, and it got significantly sideways on touchdown. Very odd. Noticed that as well, I figured it was a crosswind. ----------------------------------------- DW |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com wrote: "Richard Riley" wrote in message ... On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:19:31 -0700, "Aluckyguess" wrote: I was flying into Van Nuys this morning IFR when ATC told us to look 11:00 and we should be able to see the new Airbus's making its first Flight into LAX. I took a few pictures. http://kevinandrews.com/this_is_the_...s_superjum.htm I Tivoed the local news covering the landing at LA. If you can find any on the web, it's interesting. The wind was pretty calm, but the captain was working the rudder a LOT on landing, and it got significantly sideways on touchdown. Very odd. Noticed that as well, I figured it was a crosswind. I was watching the right and left wings flexing during the touochdown and rollout. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:
Noticed that as well, I figured it was a crosswind. Or a computer. -- Transpose mxsmanic and gmail to reach me by e-mail. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Which is easier: Boeing to Airbus, or Airbus to Boeing? | Mxsmanic | Piloting | 9 | February 21st 07 01:58 AM |
[PICTURES] Soaring Pictures ! | Frederic | Soaring | 0 | November 18th 05 08:40 PM |
Airbus | Airborne | Simulators | 3 | March 4th 05 06:00 AM |
Airbus | Ace | Simulators | 0 | March 2nd 05 05:13 PM |
Airbus | Ace | Simulators | 0 | March 2nd 05 05:13 PM |